Not sure. But if all they really wanted was a 33 year old 3 & D player then why did they even trade away PJ Tucker in the first place?
He’s making half the salary that Ariza is making next season.
Not sure. But if all they really wanted was a 33 year old 3 & D player then why did they even trade away PJ Tucker in the first place?
Because it's the upcoming 2018 - 2019 season, FA options were thin, it's a 1 year deal, we have a different coaching staff and different roster.
I don't really think Ariza is someone who benefits greatly from elite playmakers. He's a spot up shooter, just about anyone can make those passes. Knight and Booker are plenty capable as playmakers. Still, he's going to be more effected by players drawing attention from their scoring ability. Booker does that, Ayton might, Warren might, and the AASE version of Knight can too.UglyTruth wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 3:26 pmAriza is a player that has been very fortunate in terms of playing with playmakers...he’s played with the likes of Kyle Lowry, Chris Paul (in New Orleans too), John Wall, and James Harden to name a few.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 1:49 pmIf you're trying to forecast how many 3s Trevor Ariza is going to hit, you need to think about the players around him. Part of why Ariza got so many good looks in Houston is because he had two excellent guards on the floor running the offense in Chris Paul and James Harden. The Suns don't have a single player on the roster who is good at distributing the ball or running an offense. I don't think Ariza is going to get nearly as many good looks from 3 this year as he got in the past, so I suspect his percentage and efficiency will go way down.
Going from that to Brandon Knight must be quite terrifying for him.
I provided my option that I thought would be better: just don't sign Ariza, and keep the cap space. Give the minutes to young guys like Bender, Chriss, and Warren at the 4. Keep the cap flexibility to acquire a player(s) during the season to address needs once we know what we have, and/or to help facilitate a trade and acquire an asset/pick.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 4:37 pmBecause it's the upcoming 2018 - 2019 season, FA options were thin, it's a 1 year deal, we have a different coaching staff and different roster.
Should I continue? If we want to go back in time and have the same aqusition in 2017, etc., this deal probably doesn't make the most sense. With an abundant FA market next season, I'm not sure why the panic and disappointment. What else should we have spent the money on? If he can impact our roster this season while he's here by instilling defense in our young roster, and by all accounts he rips into players that don't play defense, what's the harm?
And for all of the continued moaning and groaning, not a single person griping has provided alternative options that would be better signings, assuming those players anyone might propose would want to come here in the first place.
You know. Continue the mediocrity.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:I provided my option that I thought would be better: just don't sign Ariza, and keep the cap space. Give the minutes to young guys like Bender, Chriss, and Warren at the 4. Keep the cap flexibility to acquire a player(s) during the season to address needs once we know what we have, and/or to help facilitate a trade and acquire an asset/pick.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 4:37 pmBecause it's the upcoming 2018 - 2019 season, FA options were thin, it's a 1 year deal, we have a different coaching staff and different roster.
Should I continue? If we want to go back in time and have the same aqusition in 2017, etc., this deal probably doesn't make the most sense. With an abundant FA market next season, I'm not sure why the panic and disappointment. What else should we have spent the money on? If he can impact our roster this season while he's here by instilling defense in our young roster, and by all accounts he rips into players that don't play defense, what's the harm?
And for all of the continued moaning and groaning, not a single person griping has provided alternative options that would be better signings, assuming those players anyone might propose would want to come here in the first place.
I'm of the opinion that the Suns have to start trying to win now. They got to stop trying to lose, otherwise this whole team and front office is going to be changed. Although the Ariza signing came out of left field, I'm ok with it as it provides more of what wins in the NBA, while not being a long term albatross.Superbone wrote: ↑Sat Jul 28, 2018 1:32 amYou know. Continue the mediocrity.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:I provided my option that I thought would be better: just don't sign Ariza, and keep the cap space. Give the minutes to young guys like Bender, Chriss, and Warren at the 4. Keep the cap flexibility to acquire a player(s) during the season to address needs once we know what we have, and/or to help facilitate a trade and acquire an asset/pick.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 4:37 pmBecause it's the upcoming 2018 - 2019 season, FA options were thin, it's a 1 year deal, we have a different coaching staff and different roster.
Should I continue? If we want to go back in time and have the same aqusition in 2017, etc., this deal probably doesn't make the most sense. With an abundant FA market next season, I'm not sure why the panic and disappointment. What else should we have spent the money on? If he can impact our roster this season while he's here by instilling defense in our young roster, and by all accounts he rips into players that don't play defense, what's the harm?
And for all of the continued moaning and groaning, not a single person griping has provided alternative options that would be better signings, assuming those players anyone might propose would want to come here in the first place.
So signing Ariza has taken the Suns out of mediocrity?Superbone wrote: ↑Sat Jul 28, 2018 1:32 amYou know. Continue the mediocrity.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:I provided my option that I thought would be better: just don't sign Ariza, and keep the cap space. Give the minutes to young guys like Bender, Chriss, and Warren at the 4. Keep the cap flexibility to acquire a player(s) during the season to address needs once we know what we have, and/or to help facilitate a trade and acquire an asset/pick.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 4:37 pmBecause it's the upcoming 2018 - 2019 season, FA options were thin, it's a 1 year deal, we have a different coaching staff and different roster.
Should I continue? If we want to go back in time and have the same aqusition in 2017, etc., this deal probably doesn't make the most sense. With an abundant FA market next season, I'm not sure why the panic and disappointment. What else should we have spent the money on? If he can impact our roster this season while he's here by instilling defense in our young roster, and by all accounts he rips into players that don't play defense, what's the harm?
And for all of the continued moaning and groaning, not a single person griping has provided alternative options that would be better signings, assuming those players anyone might propose would want to come here in the first place.
So many people are harping on this team without using context. Do you realize that nearly every team in the league next season is gonna have a crazy amount of cap space?AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 4:37 pmBecause it's the upcoming 2018 - 2019 season, FA options were thin, it's a 1 year deal, we have a different coaching staff and different roster.
Should I continue? If we want to go back in time and have the same aqusition in 2017, etc., this deal probably doesn't make the most sense. With an abundant FA market next season, I'm not sure why the panic and disappointment. What else should we have spent the money on? If he can impact our roster this season while he's here by instilling defense in our young roster, and by all accounts he rips into players that don't play defense, what's the harm?
And for all of the continued moaning and groaning, not a single person griping has provided alternative options that would be better signings, assuming those players anyone might propose would want to come here in the first place.
Good question. My personal preference is not to trade for Holmes. I don't really value you him enough to give up anything for him. But he has some upside, so there is a chance it may prove to be a worthwhile acquisition.
It's not an overreaction. It's just a reaction. An opinion. It is what a message board is for. A move is made, a game is played, and we react. .net is great for people being sensitive about anything negative.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Thu Jul 26, 2018 9:10 amLet's see how Ariza plays out and what he provides the team before calling the acquisition a dud. .net is great at overreacting before the players ever hit the court together.
Split T wrote: ↑Thu Jul 26, 2018 12:40 pmhe's focusing only on the perceived negatives and ignoring all positives Ariza brings. I could easily say
Elite role player with championship pedigree
Supplies defense and 3 pt shooting
Requires no plays run for him
Great mentor for other wings on roster
On 1 year deal that maintains our cap space next year.
I think even at this point in his career, Parker runs this team better than any point guard that is on the roster. And I think Parker actually has "championship pedigree"...he could actually really help Okobo along.
Over playing Chriss and Bender? Big time.UglyTruth wrote: ↑Sat Jul 28, 2018 9:50 amSo signing Ariza has taken the Suns out of mediocrity?Superbone wrote: ↑Sat Jul 28, 2018 1:32 amYou know. Continue the mediocrity.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:I provided my option that I thought would be better: just don't sign Ariza, and keep the cap space. Give the minutes to young guys like Bender, Chriss, and Warren at the 4. Keep the cap flexibility to acquire a player(s) during the season to address needs once we know what we have, and/or to help facilitate a trade and acquire an asset/pick.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 4:37 pmBecause it's the upcoming 2018 - 2019 season, FA options were thin, it's a 1 year deal, we have a different coaching staff and different roster.
Should I continue? If we want to go back in time and have the same aqusition in 2017, etc., this deal probably doesn't make the most sense. With an abundant FA market next season, I'm not sure why the panic and disappointment. What else should we have spent the money on? If he can impact our roster this season while he's here by instilling defense in our young roster, and by all accounts he rips into players that don't play defense, what's the harm?
And for all of the continued moaning and groaning, not a single person griping has provided alternative options that would be better signings, assuming those players anyone might propose would want to come here in the first place.
Guys have to play. A player doesn't get better in practice. Joe Johnson was a perfect example of this.Superbone wrote: ↑Thu Jul 26, 2018 4:52 pmYup, time to win. Booker deserves a better shot at it. Chriss and Bender got minutes they didn't deserve. I like the idea of guys toiling on the bench and working on their game in practice and getting spot minutes for now and then real minutes when they deserve them.carey wrote: ↑Thu Jul 26, 2018 4:13 pmThis is kind of where I'm at, Split. As much as I have enjoyed Bender Island I may be converting it to a timeshare soon.Split T wrote:
I think it might be good for the young guys to earn their minutes. Chriss and Bender had gauranteed minutes last year, regardless how they played. Now they have to play well to stay on the court...that's not a bad thing. If they're not good enough to warrant minutes, then good riddance, we can move on.
I was exaggerating to make a point. I was trying to focus only on the best case scenario to counteract all the worst case scenario posts.INFORMER wrote: ↑Sat Jul 28, 2018 2:11 pmSplit T wrote: ↑Thu Jul 26, 2018 12:40 pmhe's focusing only on the perceived negatives and ignoring all positives Ariza brings. I could easily say
Elite role player with championship pedigree
Supplies defense and 3 pt shooting
Requires no plays run for him
Great mentor for other wings on roster
On 1 year deal that maintains our cap space next year.
Ariza isn't elite. He is a solid 3-point shooter and a good defender. I don't think he does either at an elite level. Citing he "requires no plays run for him" seems a little like spin. Ariza's game is limited to catching and shooting 3s. So you don't run plays for him because he is couldn't do anything with those plays.
The championship pedigree is also a bit shallow. He was on a team that won a championship. I don't think the means he has "pedigree." No one is clamoring to acquire JR Smith or Tristan Thompson for their "championship pedigree."
The Suns went to the playoffs with Mario Elie as a starter.
I can see the benefit to Okobo and the championship pedigree, but I don't think he's good enough at basketball anymore.INFORMER wrote: ↑Sat Jul 28, 2018 2:16 pmI think even at this point in his career, Parker runs this team better than any point guard that is on the roster. And I think Parker actually has "championship pedigree"...he could actually really help Okobo along.
Still, I'm pouring all of our cap space into acquiring him. I don't think there was a single free agent this offseason that was worth all of our cap space.
I think it had more to do with the system than the playmakers. D'Antoni and Morey structure things to emphasize getting and taking a lot of 3s.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote: ↑Fri Jul 27, 2018 1:49 pmIf you're trying to forecast how many 3s Trevor Ariza is going to hit, you need to think about the players around him. Part of why Ariza got so many good looks in Houston is because he had two excellent guards on the floor running the offense in Chris Paul and James Harden.
Well let's get one thing straight: the Suns have been abysmal; mediocrity would be improvement.Superbone wrote: ↑Sat Jul 28, 2018 1:32 amYou know. Continue the mediocrity.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote: I provided my option that I thought would be better: just don't sign Ariza, and keep the cap space. Give the minutes to young guys like Bender, Chriss, and Warren at the 4. Keep the cap flexibility to acquire a player(s) during the season to address needs once we know what we have, and/or to help facilitate a trade and acquire an asset/pick.