Q2: Project our wins

Discussion of the league and of our favorite team.

Starting with 4 wins from Q1, how many total wins will we finish with by Game 41?

4-7
4
24%
8-10
0
No votes
11-13
12
71%
14-16
1
6%
17-19
0
No votes
20 and up
0
No votes
 
Total votes: 17

User avatar
The Bobster
Posts: 6635
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 1:04 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Re: Q2: Project our wins

Post by The Bobster »

The draft picks and draft trades were especially disheartening.
Author of The Basketball Draft Fact Book: A History of Professional Basketball's College Drafts
Available from Scarecrow Press at - https://rowman.com/ISBN/9780810890695

User avatar
The Bobster
Posts: 6635
Joined: Fri Mar 14, 2014 1:04 pm
Location: Phoenix, AZ

Re: Q2: Project our wins

Post by The Bobster »

And this gigantic shit stain all leads back to Robert Sarver.
Author of The Basketball Draft Fact Book: A History of Professional Basketball's College Drafts
Available from Scarecrow Press at - https://rowman.com/ISBN/9780810890695

User avatar
Superbone
Posts: 33496
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:44 am
Location: San Diego, CA (Phoenix Native)

Re: Q2: Project our wins

Post by Superbone »

The Bobster wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:31 am
And this gigantic s*** stain all leads back to Robert Sarver.
The man with the golden touch!
"Be Legendary."

Online
User avatar
Mori Chu
Posts: 20891
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:05 am

Re: Q2: Project our wins

Post by Mori Chu »

Superbone wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 10:07 am
The Bobster wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:31 am
And this gigantic s*** stain all leads back to Robert Sarver.
The man with the golden touch!
He touched me with his foam finger.

User avatar
Shabazz
Posts: 7425
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:16 pm

Re: Q2: Project our wins

Post by Shabazz »

Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 10:31 am
Superbone wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 10:07 am
The Bobster wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 8:31 am
And this gigantic s*** stain all leads back to Robert Sarver.
The man with the golden touch!
He touched me with his foam finger.
Would you be willing to testify? If so, maybe this is what we finally need to get him removed.

Online
User avatar
Split T
Posts: 25476
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Provo, Utah

Re: Q2: Project our wins

Post by Split T »

I didn’t realize we had Mirotic’s rights at one point. Or was that just the draft pick that ended up being used to draft mirotic?

User avatar
Ring_Wanted
Posts: 5011
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:47 am

Re: Q2: Project our wins

Post by Ring_Wanted »

Split T wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 12:27 pm
I didn’t realize we had Mirotic’s rights at one point. Or was that just the draft pick that ended up being used to draft mirotic?
We never has his rights, but if I am not mistaken he was selected with the pick we sent to HOU along with Dragic for Aaron Brooks.

Online
User avatar
Split T
Posts: 25476
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Provo, Utah

Re: Q2: Project our wins

Post by Split T »

Dragic and a 1st for brooks was such an awful trade and never made any sense. The laker pick for Knight was bad, but you could make a (weak) argument for it at the time. There is no argument for dragic and a first for brooks

User avatar
Superbone
Posts: 33496
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:44 am
Location: San Diego, CA (Phoenix Native)

Re: Q2: Project our wins

Post by Superbone »

Split T wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 2:50 pm
Dragic and a 1st for brooks was such an awful trade and never made any sense. The laker pick for Knight was bad, but you could make a (weak) argument for it at the time. There is no argument for dragic and a first for brooks
Didn't it have something to do with broken glass? :)
"Be Legendary."

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Q2: Project our wins

Post by Indy »

It did. Or at least that was the story reported that made us think trading him was good.

User avatar
Cap
Posts: 8553
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 6:08 pm

Re: Q2: Project our wins

Post by Cap »

Superbone wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 3:19 pm
Split T wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 2:50 pm
Dragic and a 1st for brooks was such an awful trade and never made any sense. The laker pick for Knight was bad, but you could make a (weak) argument for it at the time. There is no argument for dragic and a first for brooks
Didn't it have something to do with broken glass? :)
Sarver married Dragic?

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Q2: Project our wins

Post by Indy »

Cap wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 4:22 pm
Superbone wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 3:19 pm
Split T wrote:
Fri Jan 18, 2019 2:50 pm
Dragic and a 1st for brooks was such an awful trade and never made any sense. The laker pick for Knight was bad, but you could make a (weak) argument for it at the time. There is no argument for dragic and a first for brooks
Didn't it have something to do with broken glass? :)
Sarver married Dragic?
That would explain so much. Dragic did break a glass with his foot.

Post Reply