IG Horowitz reports/US Atty John Durham investigation
Posted: Wed Dec 11, 2019 8:25 am
Since this is a separate issue from the impeachment hearings and actions I thought I would start a new thread. Inspector General of the DOJ Michael Horowitz released his report into possible FISA abuse on Monday. He is now testifying before the Senate on the report.
This is the press release: https://oig.justice.gov/press/2019/2019-12-09.pdf
And the full report: https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf
I am still reading through the report (it is 480 pages) but I find it both fascinating and horrifying.
U.S. Attorney John Durham of the US Attorney's Office in the District of Connecticut was assigned by US Attorney General Bill Barr to investigate the beginnings of the Russia collusion investigation and any possible abuses or wrongdoing after the release of the Meuller report. It has since morphed into a broad, and now criminal, investigation.
The two investigations have similar tracks but the Durham investigation does not have the constraints that the IG had. I am curious what all you have heard and what your thoughts are on the two investigations.
This is the press release: https://oig.justice.gov/press/2019/2019-12-09.pdf
And the full report: https://www.justice.gov/storage/120919-examination.pdf
I am still reading through the report (it is 480 pages) but I find it both fascinating and horrifying.
U.S. Attorney John Durham of the US Attorney's Office in the District of Connecticut was assigned by US Attorney General Bill Barr to investigate the beginnings of the Russia collusion investigation and any possible abuses or wrongdoing after the release of the Meuller report. It has since morphed into a broad, and now criminal, investigation.
The two investigations have similar tracks but the Durham investigation does not have the constraints that the IG had. I am curious what all you have heard and what your thoughts are on the two investigations.