Josh Jackson has done a lot to impress me in the past year, but as I've said in other past threads, I would definitely include him in a trade if I thought it made us better. We have such a glut of SFs, and I'm not at all convinced that Josh Jackson is (or will ever be) the best of them. Jackson is the best playmaker, to be sure, but I don't know if I want or need that from the 3 spot. For pure shooting, I prefer Bridges or Reed or Ariza. For defense, Jackson is also strong, but I would be fine with Bridges or Ariza for that, too. For non-3-point scoring, I'm fine with Warren.ShelC wrote: ↑Mon Jul 09, 2018 10:35 amI don't know if a package without JJ gets it done for Love. The Cavs have said they have no plans to move him so it'd have to be an attractive package. Don't know if Chriss/Bender/Warren and picks gets it done.
I don't know that I'd make that deal with JJ, but seeing Bridges light it up is certainly encouraging. I love JJ's athleticism, defensive potential and ballhandling ability, but those might be luxuries for us if he can't be a consistent shooter or cut down on mistakes (which I think is due to playing with lesser talent). And I'm still very intrigued by Reed. We're certainly overloaded at SG/SF and if getting Love, who can post and step out, balances things out, he might be worth it. We've never had great pieces that really fit together. Love could be a step in that direction.
Ultimately I really think the bad shooting is going to give Jackson a low ceiling for his career. I like all the things he is good at, and he does seem like a gamer who has a certain "it" factor. But if he can't shoot, I don't think he can be an elite SF, which makes him expendable and replaceable to me. So I just see the loss of trading Jackson as somewhat minimal given the other SFs we have available and the other things we could acquire using Jackson as an asset.
In this specific example, I would absolutely throw in Josh Jackson to help get Kevin Love, if that's what it took. Love is an imperfect player, but he could step right in as our starting PF, which would be much better than our existing young PF rotation. The roster would essentially look like this:
PG: Knight - Okobo - Harrison
SG: Booker - Reed
SF: Ariza - Warren - Bridges
PF: Love - Bender - Chriss?
C: Ayton - Chandler
Call me crazy, but that might actually be a playoff team. And if it isn't, it will be a team that grows and gets better and would probably become a playoff team in 1-2 years. It'd also be a team with really only one position of weakness, the PG position. We could work to get a better PG in free agency or trade, either during the season or after the next season.
And I don't think the above team represents mortgaging the roster or giving up a bunch of young assets. We'd still have most of our picks and a ton of young talent. That team looks like a team that will get better and better for 5 years running, peaking right around the time that the Warriors are done winning every title.