Phx-Suns.Net

Xylus wrote:We don't have any player capable of hitting a buzzer beater under pressure.

Are you kidding me?! Your avatar has been called clutch about 1000X on this board.

Xylus wrote:Is Jeff Hornacek the worst coach in the league at drawing up an inbounds play?

I'm convinced we are the worst team in the league at executing whatever is drawn up, I'd bet big money on that.

Mori Chu wrote:TERRIBLE.

Why the heck did we have 3 PGs and 2 Morrii in the game for the last few minutes? Did we want the Grizzlies to trample us? And that last play ... horrible. Indefensible.

We made great progress with that line up.

carey wrote:

Xylus wrote:Is Jeff Hornacek the worst coach in the league at drawing up an inbounds play?

I'm convinced we are the worst team in the league at executing whatever is drawn up, I'd bet big money on that.

So you think Hornacek is calling and drawing up good stuff and it's just the players' failure to execute?

INFORMER wrote:

Xylus wrote:We don't have any player capable of hitting a buzzer beater under pressure.

Are you kidding me?! Your avatar has been called clutch about 1000X on this board.

He is clutch.

If we had made 1 more FT, we would have gone to OT. Two more, we'd have won outright. Nobody but ourselves to blame.

INFORMER wrote:

carey wrote:

Xylus wrote:Is Jeff Hornacek the worst coach in the league at drawing up an inbounds play?

I'm convinced we are the worst team in the league at executing whatever is drawn up, I'd bet big money on that.

So you think Hornacek is calling and drawing up good stuff and it's just the players' failure to execute?

I'm not sure. That play looked good for a drive by Bleds.

Up by 7 with about a minute left. Fuck.

INFORMER wrote:

Xylus wrote:We don't have any player capable of hitting a buzzer beater under pressure.

Are you kidding me?! Your avatar has been called clutch about 1000X on this board.

Statistically, that's true. He is clutch.

Doesn't mean he's a guy you go to for buzzer beaters.

Indy wrote:

Mori Chu wrote:TERRIBLE.

Why the heck did we have 3 PGs and 2 Morrii in the game for the last few minutes? Did we want the Grizzlies to trample us? And that last play ... horrible. Indefensible.

We made great progress with that line up.

A lot of good play from the team tonight and it was all for naught.

Xylus wrote:

INFORMER wrote:

Xylus wrote:We don't have any player capable of hitting a buzzer beater under pressure.

Are you kidding me?! Your avatar has been called clutch about 1000X on this board.

Statistically, that's true. He is clutch.

Doesn't mean he's a guy you go to for buzzer beaters.

I agree.

INFORMER wrote:

Xylus wrote:We don't have any player capable of hitting a buzzer beater under pressure.

Are you kidding me?! Your avatar has been called clutch about 1000X on this board.

C'mon INF, Markieff has been clutch this year in the 4th. Don't deny that.

INFORMER wrote:

Indy wrote:

Mori Chu wrote:TERRIBLE.

Why the heck did we have 3 PGs and 2 Morrii in the game for the last few minutes? Did we want the Grizzlies to trample us? And that last play ... horrible. Indefensible.

We made great progress with that line up.

A lot of good play from the team tonight and it was all for naught.

Agreed. We can't play with a lead unless we keep running, which gives plenty of chances for the other team to catch up. It is frustrating.

Xylus wrote:

INFORMER wrote:

Xylus wrote:We don't have any player capable of hitting a buzzer beater under pressure.

Are you kidding me?! Your avatar has been called clutch about 1000X on this board.

Statistically, that's true. He is clutch.

Doesn't mean he's a guy you go to for buzzer beaters.

I don't mind Markieff taking the last shot of the game. My thing is, it needs to be a good shot. They gave him the ball with no spacing with his man and his shot got blocked. I wanna know what the play was that was drawn up by our coach.

Xylus wrote: Doesn't mean he's a guy you go to for buzzer beaters.

So you shouldn't go to a clutch player for a game winning shot at the buzzer? Got it.

iLLmatic wrote:

INFORMER wrote:

Xylus wrote:We don't have any player capable of hitting a buzzer beater under pressure.

Are you kidding me?! Your avatar has been called clutch about 1000X on this board.

C'mon INF, Markieff has been clutch this year in the 4th. Don't deny that.

I'm not. I've admitted so in the past.

INFORMER wrote:

Xylus wrote: Doesn't mean he's a guy you go to for buzzer beaters.

So you shouldn't go to a clutch player for a game winning shot at the buzzer? Got it.

Do you really need me to explain the distinction here?

iLLmatic wrote:

Xylus wrote:

INFORMER wrote:

Xylus wrote:We don't have any player capable of hitting a buzzer beater under pressure.

Are you kidding me?! Your avatar has been called clutch about 1000X on this board.

Statistically, that's true. He is clutch.

Doesn't mean he's a guy you go to for buzzer beaters.

I don't mind Markieff taking the last shot of the game. My thing is, it needs to be a good shot. They gave him the ball with no spacing with his man and his shot got blocked. I wanna know what the play was that was drawn up by our coach.

That's what I meant when i agreed with Xylus. That's not the play to go to Keef. He needs more than 3 seconds.

Indy wrote:

INFORMER wrote:

Indy wrote:

Mori Chu wrote:TERRIBLE.

Why the heck did we have 3 PGs and 2 Morrii in the game for the last few minutes? Did we want the Grizzlies to trample us? And that last play ... horrible. Indefensible.

We made great progress with that line up.

A lot of good play from the team tonight and it was all for naught.

Agreed. We can't play with a lead unless we keep running, which gives plenty of chances for the other team to catch up. It is frustrating.

This wasn't an issue with us playing uptempo though. We lost because of two boneheaded turnovers at the end of the game. The inbound pass that we turned over is inexcusable in addition to Bledsoe dribbling the ball into the other player.

Indy wrote: That's what I meant when i agreed with Xylus. That's not the play to go to Keef. He needs more than 3 seconds.

Got it.