Phx-Suns.Net

Delk's 53-point game was in Sacramento on 1/2/01 in a 121-117 loss.

He made 20 of 27 shots (74%), the rest of the team made 27 of 74 (36%).

I'm actually planning on coming to this.

ShelC wrote:I'm actually planning on coming to this.

I hope to as well. I only have a half-season package, so I am not sure if this game is included yet.

Green with envy. Carry something that represents .net

glad to see Nash getting his due here,
but, wtf!
first he went to our arch enemy in LA. (granted as it turned out he was a trojan horse)
but now he's joining the Warriors coaching staff to train their guards!
that's the last thing we need is one of the greatest point guards of all-time making Curry even better.

if he was interesting in doing some guard coaching, it is the Suns who should have hired him.
seems like just another missed/screwed up opportunity by management or an extension of the curse someone put on this team last year -- or half of some evil left over by the Morri!

I am not mad. Much closer to not caring at all, actually.

Anyway, if you want your all time greats to keep representing you, you have to make it worthwhile for them, and obviously you have to make an offer. Grant Hill, for instance, should have a place on the franchise.

Ring_Wanted wrote:I am not mad. Much closer to not caring at all, actually.

Anyway, if you want your all time greats to keep representing you, you have to make it worthwhile for them, and obviously you have to make an offer. Grant Hill, for instance, should have a place on the franchise.

He can't. He's a part owner of the Hawks.

Shabazz wrote:

Ring_Wanted wrote:I am not mad. Much closer to not caring at all, actually.

Anyway, if you want your all time greats to keep representing you, you have to make it worthwhile for them, and obviously you have to make an offer. Grant Hill, for instance, should have a place on the franchise.

He can't. He's a part owner of the Hawks.

And I believe that's where he wanted to be, right?

Indy wrote:

Shabazz wrote:

Ring_Wanted wrote:I am not mad. Much closer to not caring at all, actually.

Anyway, if you want your all time greats to keep representing you, you have to make it worthwhile for them, and obviously you have to make an offer. Grant Hill, for instance, should have a place on the franchise.

He can't. He's a part owner of the Hawks.

And I believe that's where he wanted to be, right?

Right. I think he had aspirations higher than "assistant GM" or "Special Consultant to.." The guy has a ton of business ventures off the court, is loaded and doesn't need to be reporting to Ryan McDonough.

Shabazz wrote:

Indy wrote:

Shabazz wrote:

Ring_Wanted wrote:I am not mad. Much closer to not caring at all, actually.

Anyway, if you want your all time greats to keep representing you, you have to make it worthwhile for them, and obviously you have to make an offer. Grant Hill, for instance, should have a place on the franchise.

He can't. He's a part owner of the Hawks.

And I believe that's where he wanted to be, right?

Right. I think he had aspirations higher than "assistant GM" or "Special Consultant to.." The guy has a ton of business ventures off the court, is loaded and doesn't need to be reporting to Ryan McDonough.

And to be fair, I don't think he wants a full-time job like this. He has other stuff that demands a lot of his attention.

For some reason this smells of desperation.

Steve Nash being inducted in the ROH the very first game of the season.

Why? Why not wait till the "dog days" of the season when attendance starts to dwindle?

Is it because Sarver is desperate to add someone up there that he can claim to have watched?

Is it because theyre hoping to overshadow starting off the season with a PF who doesnt want to be on the team?

Are the reasons 100 percent financial?

Marion can be in the ROH but adding Amare seems more "iffy"

I just looked it up and Marjerle, Barkley and KJ all had their respective ceremonies in March.

So why did Sarver decide to do Nash's on the home opener?