Re: Suns News: Week 1 10/26-11/1
Posted: Tue Oct 27, 2015 5:42 am
https://twitter.com/BrightSideSun/status/658908998008250368
BSotS season preview podcast with Paul Coro: LINK
A place for fans of the Phoenix Suns
https://www.phx-suns.net/
A shocking amount of pessimism for a fan podcast. To compare this team to the "Gugliotta era" is stunning - does nobody enjoy watching our young players develop?carey wrote:https://twitter.com/BrightSideSun/status/658908998008250368 BSotS season preview podcast with Paul Coro: LINK
You're welcome, my man.OE32 wrote:
Thanks for posting, Carey!
Right, because things have been going so well the last 5 years. I think the pessimism is more about past performance, and "fool me once..." mentality after how things have gone (especially the last 15 months or so).A shocking amount of pessimism for a fan podcast.
Fair enough. I was optimistic last year, too. At least we know we'll see TJ get some burn.Indy wrote:Right, because things have been going so well the last 5 years. I think the pessimism is more about past performance, and "fool me once..." mentality after how things have gone (especially the last 15 months or so).A shocking amount of pessimism for a fan podcast.
Agreed there. He is a bright spot. It is just that we really don't have a single player that would be top 10 at their position. That makes it really hard for the average fan to get excited.OE32 wrote:Fair enough. I was optimistic last year, too. At least we know we'll see TJ get some burn.Indy wrote:Right, because things have been going so well the last 5 years. I think the pessimism is more about past performance, and "fool me once..." mentality after how things have gone (especially the last 15 months or so).A shocking amount of pessimism for a fan podcast.
I just don't think Wiggins would have done any more for us last year than Warren did (and Parker obviously wouldn't have either). What did we lose by ending up with Warren instead of those more highly-touted prospects? I got no regrets. TJ's awesome.Mori Chu wrote:That good season we had 2 years ago was the death of us. We got too excited and tried to shortcut the rebuilding process without properly bottoming out and getting the high draft picks and young players we needed. Now we're in that mediocrity treadmill. Even if we exceed expectations this year, we're talking about a 6-7 seed at the most, right? That's not where you want to be.
This is a sneaky good point. If we bottomed out 2 years ago there's an outside shot we get Wiggins or Parker but pretty unlikely. After that, you have the likes of Aaron Gordon, Exum, Smart, Randle, Stauskas, Vonleh, Elfrid, Dougie McBucketts, Saric, and LaVine? I'm pretty sure Warren is as good as all those guys.OE32 wrote:I just don't think Wiggins would have done any more for us last year than Warren did (and Parker obviously wouldn't have either). What did we lose by ending up with Warren instead of those more highly-touted prospects? I got no regrets. TJ's awesome.
I think Bleds and Chandler are top 10 at their positions, and some lists of PFs will put Keef in the top 10.Indy wrote:Agreed there. He is a bright spot. It is just that we really don't have a single player that would be top 10 at their position. That makes it really hard for the average fan to get excited.OE32 wrote:Fair enough. I was optimistic last year, too. At least we know we'll see TJ get some burn.Indy wrote:Right, because things have been going so well the last 5 years. I think the pessimism is more about past performance, and "fool me once..." mentality after how things have gone (especially the last 15 months or so).A shocking amount of pessimism for a fan podcast.
I can't see a 33 year old Chandler as a top 10 center. It might be close, though. And Eric as a top 10 PG? It is easier to list the starting PGs in the league he is better than.Cap wrote:I think Bleds and Chandler are top 10 at their positions, and some lists of PFs will put Keef in the top 10.Indy wrote:Agreed there. He is a bright spot. It is just that we really don't have a single player that would be top 10 at their position. That makes it really hard for the average fan to get excited.OE32 wrote:Fair enough. I was optimistic last year, too. At least we know we'll see TJ get some burn.Indy wrote:Right, because things have been going so well the last 5 years. I think the pessimism is more about past performance, and "fool me once..." mentality after how things have gone (especially the last 15 months or so).A shocking amount of pessimism for a fan podcast.
Shockingly, AASE is probably not a top 10 player at his position.
He is clearly better than Rose? You are not sure if Goran is better than him? If you are talking about pure, who is a better PG (and ignore contracts or whether they will get hurt this year), I have a hard time taking Bledsoe before 15th or 16th on that list. And this only counts starting PGs. There are at least a couple backups that I think give you more PG ability than Eric.Mori Chu wrote:Indy: Actually, that sounds about right. Bledsoe is right around #10 when I look at that list. Guys who seem clearly better than him (in no particular order):
1 John Wall
2 Kyrie Irving
3 Damian Lillard
4 Russell Westbrook
5 Mike Conley
6 Stephen Curry
7 Chris Paul
Guys who might be better / as good but it's unclear to me:
Kyle Lowry
Jrue Holiday
Goran Dragic
Jeff Teague
Decent but seem worse than Bledsoe to me:
Reggie Jackson
Kemba Walker
Ricky Rubio
Tony Parker
Rajon Rondo
Clearly not as good as Bledsoe:
Marcus Smart
Jarrett Jack
Derrick Rose
Deron Williams
Emmanuel Mudiay
Ty Lawson
George Hill
D'Angelo Russell
Michael Carter-Williams
Jose Calderon
Elfrid Payton
Isaiah Canaan
Trey Burke
===========================
So by my count there are 7-8 guys better than him and another 2-3 you could make an argument about. That's not a huge endorsement of Bledsoe but I just wanted to say that he's above average at his position.
You've got to start somewhere. 6-7 seed would be a great start.Mori Chu wrote:That good season we had 2 years ago was the death of us. We got too excited and tried to shortcut the rebuilding process without properly bottoming out and getting the high draft picks and young players we needed. Now we're in that mediocrity treadmill. Even if we exceed expectations this year, we're talking about a 6-7 seed at the most, right? That's not where you want to be.
I think he's clearly better than rose. Rose hasn't been healthy for 3 years and when he has played it's been at a level clearly below Bledsoe. To me he's 11th at worst. I agree with Mori, he's in the dragic/Lowry/Teague group somewhere.Indy wrote:He is clearly better than Rose? You are not sure if Goran is better than him? If you are talking about pure, who is a better PG (and ignore contracts or whether they will get hurt this year), I have a hard time taking Bledsoe before 15th or 16th on that list. And this only counts starting PGs. There are at least a couple backups that I think give you more PG ability than Eric.Mori Chu wrote:Indy: Actually, that sounds about right. Bledsoe is right around #10 when I look at that list. Guys who seem clearly better than him (in no particular order):
1 John Wall
2 Kyrie Irving
3 Damian Lillard
4 Russell Westbrook
5 Mike Conley
6 Stephen Curry
7 Chris Paul
Guys who might be better / as good but it's unclear to me:
Kyle Lowry
Jrue Holiday
Goran Dragic
Jeff Teague
Decent but seem worse than Bledsoe to me:
Reggie Jackson
Kemba Walker
Ricky Rubio
Tony Parker
Rajon Rondo
Clearly not as good as Bledsoe:
Marcus Smart
Jarrett Jack
Derrick Rose
Deron Williams
Emmanuel Mudiay
Ty Lawson
George Hill
D'Angelo Russell
Michael Carter-Williams
Jose Calderon
Elfrid Payton
Isaiah Canaan
Trey Burke
===========================
So by my count there are 7-8 guys better than him and another 2-3 you could make an argument about. That's not a huge endorsement of Bledsoe but I just wanted to say that he's above average at his position.