A place for fans of the Phoenix Suns
https://www.phx-suns.net/
Was he worn out from national team play the other night when he scored 21 points on 58% and grabbed 8 rebounds?SDC wrote:awful game by Goran Dragic, 3-13. he's tired. if he tries to play for his national team again next year, trade his ass.
Especially on a night when New Orleans demolished Houston and OKC gets a victory over Washington.AmareIsGod wrote:Big win is a big win!
I agree about Plumlee. He has been getting better slowly but surely. That helps us a lot not to need to rely on Len every night. Also I always liked the chemistry of Bledsoe and Plumdog.INFORMER wrote:Is it just me, or has Miles' play quietly solidified. He seems to be producing slightly above adequate in his backup center role.
This team is really dangerous when Markieff can get it going from 3. He's had the touch from beyond the arc the last two games. Good to see.
After a rather pedestrian first 3 quarters, Thomas came on in the 4th with 7 points and 4 rebounds.
I disagree. I was entertained. Loved seeing Zoran finally get his first NBA basket on an assist from Goran.da_suns_fan wrote:Like almost all home games this season, this one is BOOOOORRRIIIIING.
I think Len will break the record in his Suns tenure. 6 already in his second year!The Bobster wrote:10 by Larry Nance and then Amare Stoudemire.iLLmatic wrote:I wonder what the franchise record is for blocked shots in a game because Len is currently at 6.
It was curious how he didn't play any more after his 2nd half starting stint.AmareIsGod wrote:Big win is a big win! Wish the team would reward Len with a fucking touch from time to time. Ridiculous. 16 minutes isn't enough either, though I do understand resting those surgically repaired ankles as much as possible in what basically amounts to his full rookie campaign.
Yeah, I too have noticed Plumlee has been pretty solid lately. Great to see. When Len and Plumlee are effective, we are formidable.Mori Chu wrote:I agree about Plumlee. He has been getting better slowly but surely. That helps us a lot not to need to rely on Len every night. Also I always liked the chemistry of Bledsoe and Plumdog.INFORMER wrote:Is it just me, or has Miles' play quietly solidified. He seems to be producing slightly above adequate in his backup center role.
This team is really dangerous when Markieff can get it going from 3. He's had the touch from beyond the arc the last two games. Good to see.
After a rather pedestrian first 3 quarters, Thomas came on in the 4th with 7 points and 4 rebounds.
Code: Select all
Noel - 21:51 minutes, 2-6 for 4 points, -15, 6 boards, 2 blocks
Len - 16:27 minutes, 0-1 for 0 points, +3, 5 boards, 6 blocksINFORMER wrote:Scoreboard. Suns took care of business. Let us proceed...Cap wrote:Down by two at the half. Let there be no more talk of the dregs of the league coming into Phoenix not being dangerous.
Mori should unlock the door and let him back in..da_suns_fan wrote:INFORMER wrote:Scoreboard. Suns took care of business. Let us proceed...Cap wrote:Down by two at the half. Let there be no more talk of the dregs of the league coming into Phoenix not being dangerous.
The Cubster is alive and well over at spurstalk.
No. Way.iLLmatic wrote:Mori should unlock the door and let him back in..da_suns_fan wrote:INFORMER wrote:Scoreboard. Suns took care of business. Let us proceed...Cap wrote:Down by two at the half. Let there be no more talk of the dregs of the league coming into Phoenix not being dangerous.
The Cubster is alive and well over at spurstalk.
He's had plenty of chances.iLLmatic wrote:In the General sub-forum at least. I see no issue with keeping him restricted from the site, people can use the ignore feature if they don't like what he says.
Please don't, he ruins the board experience for many. Is really one poster worth losing many others?iLLmatic wrote:In the General sub-forum at least. I see no issue with keeping him restricted from the site, people can use the ignore feature if they don't like what he says.
+1Aztec Sunsfan wrote:Please don't, he ruins the board experience for many. Is really one poster worth losing many others?iLLmatic wrote:In the General sub-forum at least. I see no issue with keeping him restricted from the site, people can use the ignore feature if they don't like what he says.
I really don't get the infatuation around here for some posters, but among them all, this sad character, the Cubby, is pure poison, no matter how funny poison can be.
I have some folks blocked, and still get waves of what they said, either because someone quotes them, or worst, because they agitate the thread enough to derail the conversation or other posters take seriously their atention-seeking provocative messages.
I completely agree. Make a thread that he is confined to, and the only people that wll bother are the ones who actually like to talk to him.iLLmatic wrote:In the General sub-forum at least. I see no issue with keeping him restricted from the site, people can use the ignore feature if they don't like what he says.
None recently. He wasn't even badly behaved the 1 day he was allowed here. Confined to one thread, couldn't hurt anyone. He's repetetive and a but abrasive, but no worse then others. People are holding a 10+ year old grudge; Why not permit the possibility of growth?Superbone wrote:He's had plenty of chances.iLLmatic wrote:In the General sub-forum at least. I see no issue with keeping him restricted from the site, people can use the ignore feature if they don't like what he says.
He's a legend in his own time...Aztec Sunsfan wrote:Please don't, he ruins the board experience for many. Is really one poster worth losing many others?iLLmatic wrote:In the General sub-forum at least. I see no issue with keeping him restricted from the site, people can use the ignore feature if they don't like what he says.
I really don't get the infatuation around here for some posters, but among them all, this sad character, the Cubby, is pure poison, no matter how funny poison can be.
I have some folks blocked, and still get waves of what they said, either because someone quotes them, or worst, because they agitate the thread enough to derail the conversation or other posters take seriously their atention-seeking provocative messages.
