Re: Cardinals
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 3:04 pm
At least a non-losing record.Flagrant Fowl wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 1:09 pmThe Cards might finish with a winning record if they could play the Lions every week.
Page 5 of 34
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 3:18 pm
How can it be called "winning percentage" when a team can be .500 without winning a game?Superbone wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 3:04 pmAt least a non-losing record.Flagrant Fowl wrote: ↑Mon Sep 09, 2019 1:09 pmThe Cards might finish with a winning record if they could play the Lions every week.
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Mon Sep 09, 2019 6:29 pm
They technically have half a win and half a loss. Because the NFL is stupid when it comes to overtime and allowing for ties.
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Sun Oct 13, 2019 8:23 pm
Kyler Murray is impressive!
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 5:13 am
3 wins in a row! Never thought I'd see that this season!
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 12:48 pm
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 1:08 pm
Reliably beating bad teams has exceeded my expectations. Kudos to Kingsbury and his staff for that.
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 1:40 pm
Thoughts on facing my Saints? Brees is still out. I feel we are due for a stinker soon and we struggle against mobile QBs. We also have several starters out on defense now as well as our star RB.
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:07 pm
Edmonds looks like a better runner than Johnson anyways...of course Johnson offers a lot more in the passing game. I’d like to see the Cardinals use Edmonds more at the RB spot the rest of the year. We’re thin at wr anyways and could use Johnson out there.
Can’t imagine us beating the saints though. They’ve gone 5-0 without brees and beaten some pretty solid teams. I think the Giants/Bengals/Falcons are like 3-18 combined, so not exactly a huge accomplishment to beat them.
Can’t imagine us beating the saints though. They’ve gone 5-0 without brees and beaten some pretty solid teams. I think the Giants/Bengals/Falcons are like 3-18 combined, so not exactly a huge accomplishment to beat them.
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Mon Oct 21, 2019 11:18 pm
But regardless of how poor those teams are, I'm sure none of us expected the Cardinals to reel off 3 in a row.Split T wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:07 pmEdmonds looks like a better runner than Johnson anyways...of course Johnson offers a lot more in the passing game. I’d like to see the Cardinals use Edmonds more at the RB spot the rest of the year. We’re thin at wr anyways and could use Johnson out there.
Can’t imagine us beating the saints though. They’ve gone 5-0 without brees and beaten some pretty solid teams. I think the Giants/Bengals/Falcons are like 3-18 combined, so not exactly a huge accomplishment to beat them.
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2019 12:11 am
I'll be impressed if they can get 2 division wins.
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:52 am
Oh for sure, just think our 3-3-1 record is slightly misleading...I don’t expect us to finish .500, but 6-7 wins is still good progress.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 11:18 pmBut regardless of how poor those teams are, I'm sure none of us expected the Cardinals to reel off 3 in a row.Split T wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:07 pmEdmonds looks like a better runner than Johnson anyways...of course Johnson offers a lot more in the passing game. I’d like to see the Cardinals use Edmonds more at the RB spot the rest of the year. We’re thin at wr anyways and could use Johnson out there.
Can’t imagine us beating the saints though. They’ve gone 5-0 without brees and beaten some pretty solid teams. I think the Giants/Bengals/Falcons are like 3-18 combined, so not exactly a huge accomplishment to beat them.
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2019 6:42 am
certainly better than an 0-6 team...Split T wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2019 5:52 amOh for sure, just think our 3-3-1 record is slightly misleading...I don’t expect us to finish .500, but 6-7 wins is still good progress.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 11:18 pmBut regardless of how poor those teams are, I'm sure none of us expected the Cardinals to reel off 3 in a row.Split T wrote: ↑Mon Oct 21, 2019 2:07 pmEdmonds looks like a better runner than Johnson anyways...of course Johnson offers a lot more in the passing game. I’d like to see the Cardinals use Edmonds more at the RB spot the rest of the year. We’re thin at wr anyways and could use Johnson out there.
Can’t imagine us beating the saints though. They’ve gone 5-0 without brees and beaten some pretty solid teams. I think the Giants/Bengals/Falcons are like 3-18 combined, so not exactly a huge accomplishment to beat them.
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2019 8:41 am
I'd love for the Suns to be around .500 7 games into the season. I had thought I had heard Brees was playing this week-has that changed?
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2019 10:30 am
I've been hearing the same. He had been targeting this date since his injury to return. A few articles from the other day point to his return on Sunday. They're going to evaluate him Wednesday and make a decision.
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Tue Oct 22, 2019 10:31 am
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Thu Oct 24, 2019 6:38 am
Brees seems to think he can override Payton and decide for himself if he's playing or not. He says he is but I don't see the sense in rushing him back before the bye-week. Brees coming back and being rusty is the best case scenario for the Cardinals.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Tue Oct 22, 2019 10:30 amI've been hearing the same. He had been targeting this date since his injury to return. A few articles from the other day point to his return on Sunday. They're going to evaluate him Wednesday and make a decision.
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2020 10:40 am
Cards just traded David Johnson and a 2nd round pick for Deandre Hopkins...it’s crazy how good a trade this is for us. David Johnson was terrible and way overpaid last year. Hopkins is 27 and a top 3 WR in the game. Now at 8 we can take the best defensive player. Isaiah Simmons or Derrick Brown if they are there. Or trade down and add more picks. Next year could be fun!
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2020 10:58 am
Please let it be Simmons...please let it be Simmons...please let it be Simmons...
Re: Cardinals
Posted: Mon Mar 16, 2020 11:08 am
I’d love Simmons, feel like his combine probably moved him too high though.