Page 5 of 5

Re: Game Day: Suns (28-20) @ Warriors (36-8), Sat 1/31/15

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:26 pm
by iLLmatic
INFORMER wrote:I'm sure they would have tried Lynch if the pass was incomplete.

I don't have a problem with the play call.
You're crazy. That was an awful playcall. Lynch had been dominating the Patriots all game in the run. It's 2nd down and you have two timeouts to burn with arguably the best running back in the league sitting on the 1 yard line? You hand the ball off.

Re: Game Day: Suns (28-20) @ Warriors (36-8), Sat 1/31/15

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:27 pm
by Indy
INFORMER wrote:I'm sure they would have tried Lynch if the pass was incomplete.

I don't have a problem with the play call.
The only way you lose the game, at that point, is on a turn over. You do EVERYTHING to limit that possibility. Throwing a slant route into coverage isn't that.

Re: Game Day: Suns (28-20) @ Warriors (36-8), Sat 1/31/15

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:32 pm
by Mori Chu
The gossip in Seattle is, maybe they didn't call running plays at the end for Marshawn Lynch because the team is a little bit embarrassed about his bad image and his refusal to talk to media, along with the fact that he doesn't have a new contract yet, so they wanted Russell Wilson to make the big play and get the win and be the face of the franchise. Sounds overthought to me, but I guess there could be something to it.

Re: Game Day: Suns (28-20) @ Warriors (36-8), Sat 1/31/15

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 4:36 pm
by iLLmatic
Mori Chu wrote:The gossip in Seattle is, maybe they didn't call running plays at the end for Marshawn Lynch because the team is a little bit embarrassed about his bad image and his refusal to talk to media, along with the fact that he doesn't have a new contract yet, so they wanted Russell Wilson to make the big play and get the win and be the face of the franchise. Sounds overthought to me, but I guess there could be something to it.
That's a silly rumor considering Seattle offered Lynch a contract extension before the Superbowl. It was a bad play call by Darrell Bevell and Pete Carroll, plain and simple.

Re: Game Day: Suns (28-20) @ Warriors (36-8), Sat 1/31/15

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:18 pm
by Superbone
Indy wrote:
INFORMER wrote:I'm sure they would have tried Lynch if the pass was incomplete.

I don't have a problem with the play call.
The only way you lose the game, at that point, is on a turn over. You do EVERYTHING to limit that possibility. Throwing a slant route into coverage isn't that.
IF you throw any pass at all, it is away from the defense where there is NO chance of an interception.

Re: Game Day: Suns (28-20) @ Warriors (36-8), Sat 1/31/15

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 5:19 pm
by Indy
Right. Fade to corner, if at all. Not into the defense and a very short field.

Re: Game Day: Suns (28-20) @ Warriors (36-8), Sat 1/31/15

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 6:41 pm
by INFORMER
It wasn't just a slant. It was a pick play that Butler read perfectly. I think it's more of a case of him making a great play than Carroll making an awful call.

Re: Game Day: Suns (28-20) @ Warriors (36-8), Sat 1/31/15

Posted: Tue Feb 03, 2015 7:11 pm
by Indy
INFORMER wrote:It wasn't just a slant. It was a pick play that Butler read perfectly. I think it's more of a case of him making a great play than Carroll making an awful call.
It can be both. You are supposed to eliminate opportunity for the defense, not increase it.

Re: Game Day: Suns (28-20) @ Warriors (36-8), Sat 1/31/15

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 10:32 am
by Superbone
It's the end of the season. Score a touchdown and you'll win the Super Bowl. "No, thanks, I'll pass."

Re: Game Day: Suns (28-20) @ Warriors (36-8), Sat 1/31/15

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 12:20 pm
by INFORMER
Yeah, they clearly weren't trying to score a touchdown.

Re: Game Day: Suns (28-20) @ Warriors (36-8), Sat 1/31/15

Posted: Wed Feb 04, 2015 12:46 pm
by Superbone
INFORMER wrote:Yeah, they clearly weren't trying to score a touchdown.
INF, relax. It was just a joke I heard that I was "passing" along. :)