Phx-Suns.Net

So, you saying that you don't know anything about the trial. Got it.

I don't think Dr. Drew's opinions here matter either. His guest is the one with the credentials to comment and give the opinion that matters.

Is this how you think the law works? Giuliani's tweet mischaracterizes the judge's instructions. Jurors are not being split up into groups of 4, and I think you really just don't know what you are talking about and are reading a bunch of angry tweets from Trump supporters who are panicking and mad ...

Is this how you think the law works?

How is Dr. Drew an expert on government coverups? Are you saying that he can't talk to anyone on these matters? Why would he have to be an expert on the topics that he has on his podcast? You aren't an expert on what Dr. Drew is an expert on, so you shouldn't talk about what Dr. Drew can talk about...

The grotesque trial charade gets even worse this morning. The Stalinist clown judge directed the jury that they can choose among three areas of crimes to convict the former president: 1. Violations of federal election law (which no one in that courtroom is familiar with, and the judge specifically p...

I'm not sure that I understand what you are arguing. Does a podcast host, even a doctor, need to be an expert on any of it? Why do we care what random people think about this topic, if they are not experts? We were talking about the coverup, not specifically about coronvirus itself. You're making i...

We wouldn't expect anything different from a conflicted corrupt judge.

I'm not sure that I understand what you are arguing. Does a podcast host, even a doctor, need to be an expert on any of it?

Just another way they are weaponizing the FBI. iT's A cOnSpIrAcY!

Who cares what they think? It was about the CNN legal analyst thought.

Not mad, but why cover up what happened? Why freak out and start deleting stuff when FOIAd?

I don't think the prosecution showed in any way that Trump was guilty in any of their accusations, but I'm not confident that the jury didn't decide which way they were going to rule before being picked to the jury. Even if it goes to appeal immediately, I'm pretty sure that Merchan is going to make...

Seems relevant to this.

This isn't a point to incriminate Susie Lee, but to give those that buy stocks based on Congressional buying to take advantage of a possible upswing and make money too.

Mori Chu wrote: ↑

Tue May 28, 2024 6:57 am

Sure, he WANTED to get booed. That's the best outcome for him.

No, I'm not saying he wanted to get booed. I'm only saying that no one is going to be universally loved in a libertarian crowd. They don't universally agree on anything. Look at who they nominated with small amount of support.

Now, why would they knowingly and deceptively avoid transparency? https://twitter.com/COVIDSelect/status/1795429989338554558? https://twitter.com/COVIDSelect/status/1795163303431295282? https://twitter.com/SenRonJohnson/status/1794755806476288403? https://twitter.com/RepBrianBabin/status/17940688439...

Mori Chu wrote: ↑

Tue May 28, 2024 6:56 am

In2ition wrote: ↑

Mon May 27, 2024 9:02 am

Why do you think they did that? Give me their steelman argument.

Because they don't like trans people? And because Kristi Noem was banned from all the tribal land after killing her dog, so she's mad at the Indian tribes? I don't know.

Lol

Aaron Rupar often has great threads of video clips of crazy Trump events. He did not disappoint in his thread of clips from Trump's speech at the Libertarian Party convention. This was a really bumpy and embarrassing event for Trump. I think he thought the people there would like him and cheer for ...

He's not "attacking the country". He's attacking the corrupt judges. You take it as he's "attacking the country", which is a little odd that you for some reason think that they represent the country we live in.