Page 52 of 57

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2024 9:47 am
by JeremyG
In2ition wrote:
Sat Mar 30, 2024 9:17 am
Split T wrote:
Sat Mar 30, 2024 7:55 am
But if some liberal commentator on cnn says wet works, it absolutely can only be taken literally and means Biden wants to assassinate Trump
Wet works is something totally different. It's referring to special forces or agency type assassination plots and operations. Those are people and organizations with the means and resources to make those things happen. Am I wrong?
Carville’s phrasing was probably out of line (as are a lot of his comments), but he made it clear he was using the term non-literally (talking about surrogates going on TV to attack Trump).

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2024 10:07 am
by Nodack
How many previous Trump staff members say there is no way they will vote for him again? Most of them?

Esper ‘definitely not voting for Trump,’ leaves door open for Biden
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4 ... for-biden/
Trump announced that he fired Esper from his position as Defense Secretary back in November 2020, following Biden being projected to win the 2020 presidential race. He has since become a critic of his former superior, calling him a “threat to democracy” on the recent third anniversary of the Jan. 6, 2021 Capitol riot.
“And yes, I do regard him as a threat to democracy, democracy as we know it, our institutions, our political culture, all those things that make America great and have defined us as, you know, the oldest democracy on this planet,” Esper said to CNN’s Jim Acosta in January.

“No, and I’ll tell you why,” Esper said in 2022 when asked about whether he would vote for his former boss if he ran for the presidency again. “Because in my view, any elected leader needs to meet some basic criteria: they need to be able to put country over self, they need to have a certain amount of integrity and principle, they need to be able to reach across the aisle and bring people together and unite the country. Look, Donald Trump doesn’t meet those marks for me.”

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Sun Mar 31, 2024 10:52 am
by Superbone
If that doesn't tell you something, I don't know what will.

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2024 7:03 am
by Mori Chu
Who reads this and thinks, "Yeah, that's my guy for Prez"?


Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2024 9:26 am
by Nodack
Everybody is corrupt except me!

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Mon Apr 01, 2024 2:27 pm
by Nodack
FROM TRUMP: I'm suspending my campaign

Read the confidential memo: https://m.SafeGOPgift.com/6q9Bd1cvpdb
Reply Stop to Stop

Hey Patriot, it's Bob @

State GOP Membership Services.

I hate to inform you, but your membership has EXPIRED.

Renew for 2024 ASAP: https://m.SafeGOPgift.com/INN6DulNudb
Reply Stop to Stop

BIG NEWS FOR TUCKER

The Trump family ENDORSES him for Vice President!
See here: https://i.gopclick.com/xkkskMNBLok
Reply Stop to Stop

From Trump: PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE!

Please tell me you'll at least answer question 1.

Take my MAGA POLL now: https://i.gopclick.com/GclatEc0O0k
Reply Stop to Stop

Please take Hillsdale's Survey on the DOJ now. Give us just 5 minutes to help us understand your views on the Department of Justice: https://i.gopclick.com/81pcPdxHYok
Reply Stop to Stop

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 7:49 am
by Mori Chu
If only it weren't an April Fools joke!... ;-) I was actually pleasantly surprised that there weren't a ton of April Fools pranks online yesterday. Usually they are kind of silly or lame and confusing.

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Tue Apr 02, 2024 10:35 am
by Superbone
Mori Chu wrote:
Tue Apr 02, 2024 7:49 am
If only it weren't an April Fools joke!... ;-) I was actually pleasantly surprised that there weren't a ton of April Fools pranks online yesterday. Usually they are kind of silly or lame and confusing.
Although I do miss Robot's posts here.

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2024 9:50 am
by Mori Chu
Oh wow. Did he really say this?


Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2024 11:23 am
by Superbone
What a buffoon!

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Thu Apr 04, 2024 11:29 am
by Cap
He’s the least racist person in the room.

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 1:25 pm
by Mori Chu
Trump botched COVID so, so badly. We were not better off 4 years ago.


Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Fri Apr 05, 2024 3:10 pm
by Superbone
I am much better off now than four years ago. Fact!

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Wed Apr 10, 2024 4:07 pm
by Mori Chu
Trump's stock still plummeting.


Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 4:52 pm
by Mori Chu
The people who worked most closely with Trump say he is unfit and dangerous.


Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 5:25 pm
by In2ition
That dipshit Bolton voted for the war criminal, Dick Cheney. Enough said.

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 5:52 pm
by Split T
There would be no safer bet than betting In2 will immediately say something bad about anyone who says something bad about Trump

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 6:21 pm
by Mori Chu
Anybody who turns against Trump is a RINO and a traitor.

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:13 pm
by Nodack
'Unprecedented' and 'stunning' number of Trump administration alums oppose his reelection
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 145245007/
The sheer number of Trump officials − a minimum of 16 − speaking out against their former boss, and the severity of their criticism, is highly unusual. It has no historical precedent in the last century, according to three presidential historians and a political scientist interviewed by USA TODAY.

“I don’t think we’ve seen anything like this, certainly not in the last 100 years,” said Lindsay Chervinsky, a senior fellow at the Center for Presidential History at Southern Methodist University.

Re: Trump 2024

Posted: Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:33 pm
by Superbone
Nodack wrote:
Fri Apr 12, 2024 7:13 pm
'Unprecedented' and 'stunning' number of Trump administration alums oppose his reelection
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/pol ... 145245007/
The sheer number of Trump officials − a minimum of 16 − speaking out against their former boss, and the severity of their criticism, is highly unusual. It has no historical precedent in the last century, according to three presidential historians and a political scientist interviewed by USA TODAY.

“I don’t think we’ve seen anything like this, certainly not in the last 100 years,” said Lindsay Chervinsky, a senior fellow at the Center for Presidential History at Southern Methodist University.
Obviously they're all dipshits and pathetic losers!