Page 35 of 40

Re: Social media

Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:41 pm
by In2ition
The Democrats couldn't have had a better ally in the RNC.

Re: Social media

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 12:45 am
by Mori Chu
Really shameful hire by MSNBC. She directly participated in the schemes to overturn the election.

Re: Social media

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 8:49 am
by TOO
Anything for views.

Re: Social media

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 9:48 am
by Mori Chu
Twitter/X has been in decline for the past few years.


Re: Social media

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 10:02 am
by Nodack
In2ition wrote:
Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:41 pm
The Democrats couldn't have had a better ally in the RNC.
Ouch! You guys turn on your leaders pretty fast. Pence was great until that one day… This lady went from leader of the Republican Party to evil devil spawn overnight.

Re: Social media

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 10:03 am
by Nodack
Mori Chu wrote:
Sat Mar 23, 2024 9:48 am
Twitter/X has been in decline for the past few years.

Kind of looks like they all are declining.

Re: Social media

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 1:09 pm
by TOO
Twitter is just awash in silly Trumpers and blue checks farming clicks, oh and porn bots. It's so bad now. If it weren't the easiest place to follow all sports I wouldn't need it.

Re: Social media

Posted: Sat Mar 23, 2024 1:44 pm
by In2ition
Nodack wrote:
Sat Mar 23, 2024 10:02 am
In2ition wrote:
Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:41 pm
The Democrats couldn't have had a better ally in the RNC.
Ouch! You guys turn on your leaders pretty fast. Pence was great until that one day… This lady went from leader of the Republican Party to evil devil spawn overnight.
It wasn't overnight, but I'm sure it seems that way, since following the RNC isn't a focus of yours.

Idk anyone that truly trusted Pence, even from the beginning when he was picked as VP. He was picked as a concession to the establishment Reps.

Re: Social media

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2024 7:05 am
by Mori Chu
This is about regular media, not social. Glad to see that MSNBC is reversing this decision. Ronna McDaniel is an insurrectionist and liar and has no business at a news network.


Re: Social media

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2024 10:47 am
by TOO
Byyyeeeee.

Re: Social media

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2024 11:06 am
by Nodack
In2ition wrote:
Sat Mar 23, 2024 1:44 pm
Nodack wrote:
Sat Mar 23, 2024 10:02 am
In2ition wrote:
Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:41 pm
The Democrats couldn't have had a better ally in the RNC.
Ouch! You guys turn on your leaders pretty fast. Pence was great until that one day… This lady went from leader of the Republican Party to evil devil spawn overnight.
It wasn't overnight, but I'm sure it seems that way, since following the RNC isn't a focus of yours.

Idk anyone that truly trusted Pence, even from the beginning when he was picked as VP. He was picked as a concession to the establishment Reps.
Pence totally kissed Trumps ass in every possible way and stuck up for him in every possible way…until Trump asked him to do something so ridiculous and anti American that Pence couldn’t do it. Then the hang Mike Pence chants rang out after Trump threw him under the bus and blamed him for ruining his scheme.

I don’t follow the leaders of the RNC that well for sure. The leader of the RNC being replaced with Trumps daughter in law sure does sound like a power/money grab to me. I wasn’t getting many messages from the GOP until the day she took office. Now my messages have been flooded by the GOP begging me for money in various ways. Most of them lately have been aggressive. “Are you going to step up or not”.

I’m sure Trump had 400,000,000 reasons why he thought his daughter would make a better leader of the RNC.

Re: Social media

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2024 12:15 pm
by In2ition
Nodack wrote:
Sun Mar 24, 2024 11:06 am
In2ition wrote:
Sat Mar 23, 2024 1:44 pm
Nodack wrote:
Sat Mar 23, 2024 10:02 am
In2ition wrote:
Fri Mar 22, 2024 10:41 pm
The Democrats couldn't have had a better ally in the RNC.
Ouch! You guys turn on your leaders pretty fast. Pence was great until that one day… This lady went from leader of the Republican Party to evil devil spawn overnight.
It wasn't overnight, but I'm sure it seems that way, since following the RNC isn't a focus of yours.

Idk anyone that truly trusted Pence, even from the beginning when he was picked as VP. He was picked as a concession to the establishment Reps.
Pence totally kissed Trumps ass in every possible way and stuck up for him in every possible way…until Trump asked him to do something so ridiculous and anti American that Pence couldn’t do it. Then the hang Mike Pence chants rang out after Trump threw him under the bus and blamed him for ruining his scheme.

I don’t follow the leaders of the RNC that well for sure. The leader of the RNC being replaced with Trumps daughter in law sure does sound like a power/money grab to me. I wasn’t getting many messages from the GOP until the day she took office. Now my messages have been flooded by the GOP begging me for money in various ways. Most of them lately have been aggressive. “Are you going to step up or not”.

I’m sure Trump had 400,000,000 reasons why he thought his daughter would make a better leader of the RNC.
Ronna did a horrible job in 2020 elections and then did even worse in the 2022 mid-terms. You can sing her praises all you want, but you're coming from an opposing and less knowledgeable pov to the situation. I'll say this again, but it's just going to get ignored. There were many candidates in the mid-term that had close races and a very realistic opportunity to win those seats where the RNC refused to give money to. Instead they wasted millions on candidates that had zero chance. Campaigns were begging them for money to get them over the top and she again and again turned a blind eye toward them. Even without the money they were extremely close races, yet where she decided to spend lost by 10 points or more. That's insane, and it comes off as an RNC that didn't want to win or was working for the DNC. Hence, the uniparty claims.

Re: Social media

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2024 12:22 pm
by Nodack
So now Trumps daughter is there to make sure all the money goes to candidates to help get them elected and not to pay her father in laws legal bills. I have all the faith in the world….

Re: Social media

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2024 12:52 pm
by In2ition
Well, supposedly Trump has all this cash saved for his campaign, and Truth Social is about to go public, so he could have another windfall in at least net worth increased by up to $3.5 billion.

Re: Social media

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2024 12:56 pm
by Nodack
supposedly

Re: Social media

Posted: Sun Mar 24, 2024 8:55 pm
by Mori Chu
It seems bad to me that the owner and CEO of a major social platform is so openly stating that he's on one side in a crucial election year.


Re: Social media

Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 6:17 am
by In2ition
He's not saying that he's going to put his thumb on the scales like the previous owners of Twitter did the last Presidential election or like Zuckerburg is with IG and Facebook.

Re: Social media

Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 7:47 am
by Mori Chu
The idea that Truth Social is worth billions of dollars is preposterous. This is a way for rich people to funnel money to Trump.


Re: Social media

Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 7:51 am
by Mori Chu
In2ition wrote:
Mon Mar 25, 2024 6:17 am
He's not saying that he's going to put his thumb on the scales like the previous owners of Twitter did the last Presidential election or like Zuckerburg is with IG and Facebook.
Those people / networks did not "put (their) thumb on the scales" in previous elections. That's untrue right-wing BS.

Re: Social media

Posted: Mon Mar 25, 2024 7:56 am
by In2ition
Mori Chu wrote:
Mon Mar 25, 2024 7:51 am
In2ition wrote:
Mon Mar 25, 2024 6:17 am
He's not saying that he's going to put his thumb on the scales like the previous owners of Twitter did the last Presidential election or like Zuckerburg is with IG and Facebook.
Those people / networks did not "put (their) thumb on the scales" in previous elections. That's untrue right-wing BS.
Did the Hunter Biden Laptop story get suppressed on Twitter? Did Zuckerburg ban a ton of people and donate $400 million for mail in ballots?
Yes, they objectively put their thumbs on the scale in a massive way, as did/does Google. Saying they didn't is just untrue left-wing BS.