2018 NBA Draft Thread
Online
- specialsauce
- Posts: 8675
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
They’re both blah. JJJ doesn’t rebound and Bamba can’t hit FTs well and is limited offensively. Both are huge question marks to me and a huge step below Ayton.
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
When Booker is out, he kind of was our third option.carey wrote:Is Mirotic a starting PF in the NBA in your opinion?
Do you think if Bender shot the ball as aggressively as Mirotic that he would put up the same numbers? MIrotic is only shooting 40/30 as a Pelican. In February Bender is shooting 49/44 and putting up 13/6/2 in 30mpg. That is pretty solid numbers for a guy that on most nights isn't even your 3rd option.
TJ can score, Daniels can shoot 3s, and Ulis can drive a little. But Jackson and Bender are our only guys who can both handle and score on some nights. Bender gets a lot of touches when we are playing well.
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
I think maybe Porter would be worthy of a top 5 pick depending on his back. He is a three.Split T wrote:Yep and there aren't any SG/SF in this draft that should be taken top 5 anyways. The Bridges are the best and Miles is a 3/4 that should go around 10-12. Mikal is probably in the same range, maybe 8-12.specialsauce wrote:I don’t see why we aren’t in the position to take the BPA? The only positions I’d avoid are SG and SF with Booker and Jackson there. Nobody else is worth passing up a draft pick over.
Doncic is a weird prospect in that he's probably best suited to defend the 3, but he's a PG offensively. I still have some hope that he can defend the 4 a bit.
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
Fair question. I think the answer is using Josh in the same way used to use Shawn Marion to cover Nash’s defensive weaknesses. But it does leave Warren out. He can’t cover an opposing 2 or 3.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:Can somebody who's a big Doncic fan explain to me how the roster would work with Doncic on our team? Would he be our SF? If so, what about Josh Jackson? Is he more of an SG? If so, how do we play him with Booker? Is he more of a PG? If so, I kind of get it on offense, but on D can he really stop guys like Russell Westbrook, Chris Paul, Steph Curry, etc.? Isn't that going to be a defensive nightmare? Can somebody describe to me a rotation that makes sense with Doncic on the Suns? (I don't hate the dude, I just want to understand how we might use him if we took him.)
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
I'd play him at the 4. He's 6'10. Thin, but not overly. I think he'll be fine at the 4JCSunsfan wrote:I think maybe Porter would be worthy of a top 5 pick depending on his back. He is a three.Split T wrote:Yep and there aren't any SG/SF in this draft that should be taken top 5 anyways. The Bridges are the best and Miles is a 3/4 that should go around 10-12. Mikal is probably in the same range, maybe 8-12.specialsauce wrote:I don’t see why we aren’t in the position to take the BPA? The only positions I’d avoid are SG and SF with Booker and Jackson there. Nobody else is worth passing up a draft pick over.
Doncic is a weird prospect in that he's probably best suited to defend the 3, but he's a PG offensively. I still have some hope that he can defend the 4 a bit.
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
How about the mid 40% 3pt shooting compared to Bamba's sub 30%?TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Too bad he rebounds like a MoBro. I'd take Bamba all day. The age difference means nothing to me, and it won't matter for a very long time, not sure why everyone is so wrapped up in that. This reminds me of everyone going gaga over Jonathan Isaac, meh.O_Gardino wrote:Bamba is almost a year and a half older, so his body is bound to be more mature.JCSunsfan wrote:And the debate will be which of these two. JJJ has a very immature body. He is big. He has a very good wing span. He still looks like he has baby fat. He has the frame to turn a lot of fat to muscle. Bamba is longer. That 7-9 wingspan is unheard of. But he is thin. Those twig legs are not going to get that much bigger. This one is tough. Bamba is a better rebounder though. JJJ should be. He just doesn't seem to be interested in rebounding as much.Split T wrote:[youtube][/youtube]
This is the most he's shown offensively. Scoring in the post, driving, passing and of course hitting the 3 ball. His defense is the real reason I want him.
[youtube][/youtube]
To me, it's not even close. JJJ does everything well, his head is up, and I think he has special awareness of everything happening on the court.
And JJJ isn't a poor rebounder. His counting numbers are low but he also only plays 22 minutes a game. His rebound rate is decent. He also plays a lot on the perimeter. I think he'll rebound fine in the NBA. He moves better defensively than Bamba as well and is just better at everything on offense. Rebounding is literally the only thing Bamba has on JJJ.
Maybe I haven't seen the right Bamba games but he hasn't impressed me. I have JJJ comfortably ahead of him.
Online
- specialsauce
- Posts: 8675
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
I’d love to find a player in college who didn’t rebound well then suddenly did in the NBA
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
Andre Drummond was a mediocre rebounder in college. So was Tristan Thompson. Both had rebound rates about the same as JJJ
Online
- specialsauce
- Posts: 8675
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
Drummond averaged 10.6 per game.
JJJ is at 6. If he can’t stay on the court more than 22 mpg to grab them, that’s a serious problem. That is not an excuse.
And Tristan Thompson has never rebounded 10 per game.
JJJ is at 6. If he can’t stay on the court more than 22 mpg to grab them, that’s a serious problem. That is not an excuse.
And Tristan Thompson has never rebounded 10 per game.
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
7.6, not 10.6. And it's ridiculous that JJJ only plays 22 minutes, it's not his fault.specialsauce wrote:Drummond averaged 10.6 per game.
JJJ is at 6. If he can’t stay on the court more than 22 mpg to grab them, that’s a serious problem. That is not an excuse.
Online
- specialsauce
- Posts: 8675
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
Whoops you’re right on that one, misread itSplit T wrote:7.6, not 10.6. And it's ridiculous that JJJ only plays 22 minutes, it's not his fault.specialsauce wrote:Drummond averaged 10.6 per game.
JJJ is at 6. If he can’t stay on the court more than 22 mpg to grab them, that’s a serious problem. That is not an excuse.
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
No but he's been at 9.4, 10 rebounds isn't some magical number that makes you a good rebounder. Tristan wasn't very good in college and he's been an above average rebounder in the NBA.specialsauce wrote: And Tristan Thompson has never rebounded 10 per game.
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
For the record, I'm not claiming JJJ will turn into Drummond as a rebounder or even Thompson. He definitely has work to do there, I just think he is so good at everything else that I can live with his average rebounding.
- JustWinBaby
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2016 2:33 pm
- Location: Buckeye, Az
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
I thought Doncic was a three. If he is as I have read after my post a potential special playmaker like Ben Simmons that changes my thinking. I like Ayton but a playmaker is more important long term. I would take him while trying to get a big later or via free agency.specialsauce wrote:I don’t see why we aren’t in the position to take the BPA? The only positions I’d avoid are SG and SF with Booker and Jackson there. Nobody else is worth passing up a draft pick over.
The four best teams in the league at this time do not have anyone of consequence at the 5. They all however have expert playmakers. That appears is what Doncic brings. It that is the case he is my number 1 pick, even if Ayton is available.
I still think it is going to be hard for us to get the 1st or 2nd pick. I read today that Cuban sees no good reason for the Mavs to win games. I expect all the other teams feel the same. I wonder how we are really going to pull off this tank. I think Booker would really like to win some games.
What was the reason to get rid of Monty again? Oh yeah, that guy we drafted rather than Doncic.
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
What do you guys think of Daniel Gafford?
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
The few do not outweigh the many.Split T wrote:Andre Drummond was a mediocre rebounder in college. So was Tristan Thompson. Both had rebound rates about the same as JJJ
To each their own, but I'll be underwhelmed with either Jackson Jr or Young.
Love, Hurts.
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
Bamba is a very nice rebounder. He gets ones where he goes for the block, doesn't get it, but still turns back around into the play to get the rebound. Jackson doesn't get those. When Jackson contests a shot, somebody else has to get the rebound.Split T wrote:How about the mid 40% 3pt shooting compared to Bamba's sub 30%?TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Too bad he rebounds like a MoBro. I'd take Bamba all day. The age difference means nothing to me, and it won't matter for a very long time, not sure why everyone is so wrapped up in that. This reminds me of everyone going gaga over Jonathan Isaac, meh.O_Gardino wrote:Bamba is almost a year and a half older, so his body is bound to be more mature.JCSunsfan wrote:And the debate will be which of these two. JJJ has a very immature body. He is big. He has a very good wing span. He still looks like he has baby fat. He has the frame to turn a lot of fat to muscle. Bamba is longer. That 7-9 wingspan is unheard of. But he is thin. Those twig legs are not going to get that much bigger. This one is tough. Bamba is a better rebounder though. JJJ should be. He just doesn't seem to be interested in rebounding as much.Split T wrote: This is the most he's shown offensively. Scoring in the post, driving, passing and of course hitting the 3 ball. His defense is the real reason I want him.
To me, it's not even close. JJJ does everything well, his head is up, and I think he has special awareness of everything happening on the court.
And JJJ isn't a poor rebounder. His counting numbers are low but he also only plays 22 minutes a game. His rebound rate is decent. He also plays a lot on the perimeter. I think he'll rebound fine in the NBA. He moves better defensively than Bamba as well and is just better at everything on offense. Rebounding is literally the only thing Bamba has on JJJ.
Maybe I haven't seen the right Bamba games but he hasn't impressed me. I have JJJ comfortably ahead of him.
Jackson will get more DRBs when his body fills out; you can see him fighting for some that he just doesn't have the bulk to get. He'll also get more in the NBA anyway because all the long 3s result in lots of rebounds farther from the basket. Jackson's mobility will help him there.
But to me, all that is moot. In today's NBA, you don't need one dominant rebounder. You need lots of guys going for the rebounds, and you need lots of guys who can create plays. Jackson can do both, and his playmaking from is really very nice for a 5.
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
WORDJustWinBaby wrote:I thought Doncic was a three. If he is as I have read after my post a potential special playmaker like Ben Simmons that changes my thinking. I like Ayton but a playmaker is more important long term. I would take him while trying to get a big later or via free agency.specialsauce wrote:I don’t see why we aren’t in the position to take the BPA? The only positions I’d avoid are SG and SF with Booker and Jackson there. Nobody else is worth passing up a draft pick over.
The four best teams in the league at this time do not have anyone of consequence at the 5. They all however have expert playmakers. That appears is what Doncic brings. It that is the case he is my number 1 pick, even if Ayton is available.
I still think it is going to be hard for us to get the 1st or 2nd pick. I read today that Cuban sees no good reason for the Mavs to win games. I expect all the other teams feel the same. I wonder how we are really going to pull off this tank. I think Booker would really like to win some games.
Ayton is fantastic at secondary skills. Now, the NBA appears to be trying to re-balance the rules so that Big men matter more. Maybe during Ayton's career he will lead a team to some playoff wins.
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
That's true. I wasnt using them to prove JJJ would be a great rebounder. Just to show it's possible.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:The few do not outweigh the many.Split T wrote:Andre Drummond was a mediocre rebounder in college. So was Tristan Thompson. Both had rebound rates about the same as JJJ
To each their own, but I'll be underwhelmed with either Jackson Jr or Young.
Re: 2018 NBA Draft Thread
https://twitter.com/JonRothstein/status/966795893868515328
Will be really good to see him play competitive basketball before the draft