Democratic Convention

* THIS SECTION IS NOW CLOSED *
User avatar
Mori Chu
Posts: 23607
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:05 am

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by Mori Chu »

Sinema is burning a lot of bridges with the Dems right now. You have to figure if she keeps holding up or ends up derailing the infrastructure / Build Back Better bills, she'll get a fierce primary next time.

User avatar
Nodack
Posts: 9697
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:50 pm

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by Nodack »

They are talking about a no confidence vote in her. I am not sure what that means besides just labeling her bad seed and maybe taking away her assignments.
In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.

User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 12987
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by In2ition »

Sinema is really embracing the McCain role of being a maverick, but on the opposite party?
"When we all think alike, nobody is thinking" - Walter Lippmann
"Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them." ~ Frederick Douglass

User avatar
Mori Chu
Posts: 23607
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:05 am

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by Mori Chu »

In2ition wrote:
Wed Sep 29, 2021 10:58 am
Sinema is really embracing the McCain role of being a maverick, but on the opposite party?
But McCain was a maverick because he had certain principles, issues he cared about, things he wanted to change. What does Sinema want? She won't say. She's not discussiong or negotiating in good faith. It seems likely that her rich donors have asked her to tank this bill, and so she's doing exactly that. There's no clear statement of principle or value here.

User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 12987
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by In2ition »

Mori Chu wrote:
Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:06 am
In2ition wrote:
Wed Sep 29, 2021 10:58 am
Sinema is really embracing the McCain role of being a maverick, but on the opposite party?
But McCain was a maverick because he had certain principles, issues he cared about, things he wanted to change. What does Sinema want? She won't say. She's not discussiong or negotiating in good faith. It seems likely that her rich donors have asked her to tank this bill, and so she's doing exactly that. There's no clear statement of principle or value here.
I think that's fair. Idk if McCain was quite as righteous as he was portrayed though.
"When we all think alike, nobody is thinking" - Walter Lippmann
"Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them." ~ Frederick Douglass

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by Indy »

In2ition wrote:
Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:09 am
Mori Chu wrote:
Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:06 am
In2ition wrote:
Wed Sep 29, 2021 10:58 am
Sinema is really embracing the McCain role of being a maverick, but on the opposite party?
But McCain was a maverick because he had certain principles, issues he cared about, things he wanted to change. What does Sinema want? She won't say. She's not discussiong or negotiating in good faith. It seems likely that her rich donors have asked her to tank this bill, and so she's doing exactly that. There's no clear statement of principle or value here.
I think that's fair. Idk if McCain was quite as righteous as he was portrayed though.
Spoiler alert, he was not. Nobody is.

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by Indy »

Mori Chu wrote:
Wed Sep 29, 2021 10:37 am
Sinema is burning a lot of bridges with the Dems right now. You have to figure if she keeps holding up or ends up derailing the infrastructure / Build Back Better bills, she'll get a fierce primary next time.
She doesn't care about being primaried. She is cashing in big time and will be able to retire in peace, while taking 5 and 6 figure speaking gigs when she feels like it. She has 4 more years in office, and has already grown her net worth by 30x.

User avatar
Nodack
Posts: 9697
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:50 pm

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by Nodack »

Everything depends on your point of view I guess. McCain blocked the Republicans from killing Obamacare. He didn’t even like Obamacare. He blocked it because Trump promised to repeal and replace Obamacare with something much better and much cheaper that covers all Americans. When it came time Trump and his fellow Republicans decided they just wanted to kill Obamacare and not replace it with anything. At least that’s what I got out of it. McCain rejected that.


Sienna says she is trying to be bipartisan. I get some of what she is fighting for. I just think bipartisanship is a list cause in America at this point in time. Dems want to eliminate the filibuster rule so they can pass a bunch of stuff with their tiny majority. Sienna had a point that if you do that you are also letting Republicans do a bunch of stuff if they ever get a tiny majority in the future. Midterms always favor the party out of power and Republicans could easily regain a majority right after the Dems kill the filibuster handing them a blank check to pass all kinds of things Fems wouldn’t like.

I was reading more about Sinema and her reasons and apparently she is in favor of most of the stuff in the infrastructure deal. She is just concerned about the price tag and favors a smaller deal.

I was also reading about the deal and the price is spread out over ten years and isn’t one lump sum.

Part of the deal is a push for electric cars. There is some huge incentives to buy electric. Up to $12,500 in incentives if you buy electric. I can see where Republicans would appose this. They don’t get a break buying a gas engine car and will feel like they are paying for that price break and being penalized for driving a gas car. Car makers are already going all in on electric already. I guess this will be the nail in the gas coffin.
In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by Indy »

Nodack wrote:
Wed Sep 29, 2021 11:45 am
Everything depends on your point of view I guess. McCain blocked the Republicans from killing Obamacare. He didn’t even like Obamacare. He blocked it because Trump promised to repeal and replace Obamacare with something much better and much cheaper that covers all Americans. When it came time Trump and his fellow Republicans decided they just wanted to kill Obamacare and not replace it with anything. At least that’s what I got out of it. McCain rejected that.


Sienna says she is trying to be bipartisan. I get some of what she is fighting for. I just think bipartisanship is a list cause in America at this point in time. Dems want to eliminate the filibuster rule so they can pass a bunch of stuff with their tiny majority. Sienna had a point that if you do that you are also letting Republicans do a bunch of stuff if they ever get a tiny majority in the future. Midterms always favor the party out of power and Republicans could easily regain a majority right after the Dems kill the filibuster handing them a blank check to pass all kinds of things Fems wouldn’t like.

I was reading more about Sinema and her reasons and apparently she is in favor of most of the stuff in the infrastructure deal. She is just concerned about the price tag and favors a smaller deal.

I was also reading about the deal and the price is spread out over ten years and isn’t one lump sum.

Part of the deal is a push for electric cars. There is some huge incentives to buy electric. Up to $12,500 in incentives if you buy electric. I can see where Republicans would appose this. They don’t get a break buying a gas engine car and will feel like they are paying for that price break and being penalized for driving a gas car. Car makers are already going all in on electric already. I guess this will be the nail in the gas coffin.
She was directly asked what price tag she is comfortable with, and she won't give an answer. And the price tag doesn't matter as much as people are saying, because it is completely paid for and won't add a dime to the debt. But that means people like Bezos and Musk have to pay taxes. And that is what she is against, because the pharma lobby and others like that are paying her to oppose it.

User avatar
Nodack
Posts: 9697
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:50 pm

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by Nodack »

I don’t doubt it but, do you actually know they are paying her or are you assuming they are? She seems real easy to not like. I have written her a note at her site a while ago and told her that I will not be voting for her again because she is basically acting like she is a Republican. I really want to understand her a little more and was trying to give her the benefit of doubt. Her little curtsy at the minimum wage vote was immature.

I don’t actually believe the money is paid for. It will end up being added to the debt one way or the other. We do need to upgrade America and that’s expensive. I know some of the stuff in the Bill but, not all of it for sure. I am sure there is a crap load of pork in it too.

A lot of the super rich get away with not paying their fair share of taxes. Everyone hates taxes. I hate taxes but as an American looking at the debt I am willing to do whatever is necessary to get our deficit in check even if that means paying more taxes. Taxes ARE what pays our bills. All these tax breaks to help out Americans is a great way to win votes but, it does nothing to pay off our debt. 2.3 Trillion we paid to lose the Afghanistan war?
In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by Indy »

It is well documented. This is from last week when she came out opposed to the bill around limiting prescription drug prices.
Big Pharma, medical firms donated $750K to Kyrsten Sinema — then she opposed drug bill
https://www.salon.com/2021/09/23/big-ph ... osed-bill/

This is from this week when she held a $6k/plate luncheon.
Kyrsten Sinema holding fundraiser with business lobby groups that want to kill Biden’s agenda--
Sinema is charging up to $5,800 to attend a 45-minute fundraiser with groups that mostly donate to Republicans
https://www.salon.com/2021/09/28/kyrste ... ns-agenda/

The Salon links were just the first that came up, not the only place reporting on it.

User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 12987
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by In2ition »

Democratic Sen. Ben Ray Lujan hospitalized after stroke
Lujan's office said he is expected to make a full recovery but did not specify when the senator would be back in Washington for votes.


Feb. 1, 2022, 2:54 PM MST
By Teaganne Finn
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congre ... e-n1288382

WASHINGTON — Democratic Sen. Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico suffered a stroke and underwent surgery over the weekend, his office said Tuesday, adding that he is expected to make a full recovery.

Lujan, 49, started to experience dizziness and fatigue on Thursday and checked himself into Christus St. Vincent Regional Hospital in Santa Fe and then transferred to UNM Hospital in Albuquerque where he was found "to have suffered a stroke in the cerebellum, affecting his balance," said Carlos Sanchez, Lujan's chief of staff, in a statement.

"As part of his treatment plan, he subsequently underwent decompressive surgery to ease swelling," Sanchez added.

His office did not specify when the first-term senator plans to be back in Washington.

Lujan's absence from the Senate means Democrats will lack the 50 members needed for any purely partisan votes.

Democrats would not need any GOP votes to confirm President Joe Biden's eventual Supreme Court nominee so long as the party is unified in its support. Biden has indicated he plans to name his pick before March.
"When we all think alike, nobody is thinking" - Walter Lippmann
"Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them." ~ Frederick Douglass

User avatar
Mori Chu
Posts: 23607
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:05 am

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by Mori Chu »

Hmm. Hope he'll be okay. He's pretty young, so one would hope he will make a full recovery. But a stroke is no joke.

User avatar
3rdside
Posts: 1563
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:59 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by 3rdside »

Indy wrote:It is well documented. This is from last week when she came out opposed to the bill around limiting prescription drug prices.
Big Pharma, medical firms donated $750K to Kyrsten Sinema — then she opposed drug bill
https://www.salon.com/2021/09/23/big-ph ... osed-bill/

This is from this week when she held a $6k/plate luncheon.
Kyrsten Sinema holding fundraiser with business lobby groups that want to kill Biden’s agenda--
Sinema is charging up to $5,800 to attend a 45-minute fundraiser with groups that mostly donate to Republicans
https://www.salon.com/2021/09/28/kyrste ... ns-agenda/

The Salon links were just the first that came up, not the only place reporting on it.
Does this assume no other senator ever does fundraisers?

User avatar
3rdside
Posts: 1563
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:59 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Democratic Convention

Post by 3rdside »

And would it even be a talking point if the D’s had a greater majority?

User avatar
Nodack
Posts: 9697
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2014 6:50 pm

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by Nodack »

Taking money from the people apposing the bill you are set to vote on and then voting against it, I’m sure was just a coincidence. Dems only have enough votes to succeed if every Democrat is on board. Two turned against the party and seem to have been paid handsomely for it. I’mot saying they are on the take. It just looks that way.
In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.

User avatar
3rdside
Posts: 1563
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:59 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by 3rdside »

Sure but money’s been around forever, so it’s not like these are the first politicians who may have been influenced by it and, like two-way gerrymandering, it almost certainly happens both ways?

So is it really corruption or is it democracy working as it should (a relative concept in Citizens United USA); that if you can’t get a stronger majority (and throw in a popular president, unlike the current very unpopular one) then does a bill deserve to pass?

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by Indy »

It is funny how people describe Biden as a very unpopular president when in four full years in office, Trump only had 1 month of a higher approval rating than Biden's lowest.

User avatar
3rdside
Posts: 1563
Joined: Tue Feb 17, 2015 6:59 pm
Location: Sydney, Australia

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by 3rdside »

Trump is hardly the best barometer for comparison .. and he's not too far off him anyway from what I can tell.

User avatar
Mori Chu
Posts: 23607
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:05 am

Re: Democratic Convention

Post by Mori Chu »

Indy wrote:
Wed Feb 02, 2022 8:37 am
It is funny how people describe Biden as a very unpopular president when in four full years in office, Trump only had 1 month of a higher approval rating than Biden's lowest.
The way I look at it is, conservative "news" like Fox is 100% anti-Biden. And most "mainstream" or "liberal" news is about 50/50 or 60/40, trying to remain neutral-ish and not openly cheer for one side. So overall the coverage is about 75% negative about any Dem President. And the polls reflect that.

Biden's done a lot of good things (COVID relief; general COVID policies; Infrastructure bill; repealing many awful Trump exec. orders; appointing lots of qualified and diverse judges; general comportment, qualification for the job, appointing competent people, not being a megalomaniac dictator), and he's done some things poorly (e.g. Afghanistan), and he's been blocked from doing other things by circumstances (inability to pass BBB / voting rights due to 50/50 Senate and noncomplaint Manchinema).

Overall he isn't a disaster and doesn't deserve a crummy approval rating. But it's hard to get people excited about him when COVID is still causing so much daily misery, inflation has people worried about the economy, and the threat of military conflict with Russia looms. I'm still extremely happy he is President rather than you-know-who.

Locked