Gotcha. I agree golf is a strange choice.JCSunsfan wrote:Oh no. I would LOVE to watch table tennis over golf. Like I said, I can fall asleep to golf every Sunday. I would find Olympic table tennis interesting.Superbone wrote:The problem is that you actually watched. I'm not annoyed at all. Haven't even seen a flicker of it on my television screen. And it sounds like you are knocking table tennis. Watching Olympic table tennis is awesome.JCSunsfan wrote:OK. Anyone else annoyed as much as I was with Olympic golf. Its boring. I can fall asleep to golf any Sunday afternoon I want. All they could talk about was who was not there. The coverage was odd, breaking away mid-sentence, and mid-shot for commercials and breaking back in mid-sentence (not that there was anything to miss). I would rather watch table tennis or badminton or something.
Olympic golf is the worst idea ever.
Olympics
Re: Olympics
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Re: Olympics
What about Olympic Table Golf?


The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan
Re: Olympics
Thumb wrestling should be an official Olympics event.
“Are you crazy?! You think I’m going to go for seven years and try to get there? You enjoy the 2030 draft picks that we have holding? I want to try to see the game today.” — Ish 3/13/25
Re: Olympics
I have a lot of trouble watching sports that don't have a lot of scoring or otherwise impactful plays/moments. Soccer and hockey are really boring to me because of how rarely they score. I also don't watch baseball because the game feels slow to me. I like golf a bit more, though it's a fairly tame and slow sport and basically violates the rule I just stated.
I think I'd like soccer a lot if they just had more scoring. Maybe if the goal were bigger or if there were no goalies allowed or something. Some kind of "extreme" soccer where the final score would be 14-11 or whatever. I realize that my ideas are stupid and that tons of people love the sport as-is; just saying that it doesn't really work for me.
I think I'd like soccer a lot if they just had more scoring. Maybe if the goal were bigger or if there were no goalies allowed or something. Some kind of "extreme" soccer where the final score would be 14-11 or whatever. I realize that my ideas are stupid and that tons of people love the sport as-is; just saying that it doesn't really work for me.
Re: Olympics
The solution for soccer is easy--smaller field, less players.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:I have a lot of trouble watching sports that don't have a lot of scoring or otherwise impactful plays/moments. Soccer and hockey are really boring to me because of how rarely they score. I also don't watch baseball because the game feels slow to me. I like golf a bit more, though it's a fairly tame and slow sport and basically violates the rule I just stated.
I think I'd like soccer a lot if they just had more scoring. Maybe if the goal were bigger or if there were no goalies allowed or something. Some kind of "extreme" soccer where the final score would be 14-11 or whatever. I realize that my ideas are stupid and that tons of people love the sport as-is; just saying that it doesn't really work for me.
- Furlanfufi
- Posts: 1621
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 7:09 pm
- Location: São Paulo, Brazil
Re: Olympics
C'mon Mori.
Just watch Brasil x Australia.
I'm not a big fan of women's soccer, but the score was 0 x 0 and it was one of the most thrilling games of the year.
The solution for soccer is exactly the opposite - bigger fields for men, smaller fields for women.
If you want to watch a soccer game with less players in a smaller field, just watch indoor soccer. It's great to play, unbearable to watch (unless is some highlight reel of Falcao).
Just watch Brasil x Australia.
I'm not a big fan of women's soccer, but the score was 0 x 0 and it was one of the most thrilling games of the year.
The solution for soccer is exactly the opposite - bigger fields for men, smaller fields for women.
If you want to watch a soccer game with less players in a smaller field, just watch indoor soccer. It's great to play, unbearable to watch (unless is some highlight reel of Falcao).
Re: Olympics
Move the object to the other end and get it in the net, hole, basket, end zone and defend your side. Basketball, hockey, soccer, football, field hockey, rugby, foosball, water polo, polo
Shoot it over the net in the center and keep it inbounds. Tennis, badminton, volleyball, (racquetball, handball sort of).
Shoot it over the net in the center and keep it inbounds. Tennis, badminton, volleyball, (racquetball, handball sort of).
In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.
Re: Olympics
And here comes along another forgetting about ping pong. <sigh>Nodack wrote:Move the object to the other end and get it in the net, hole, basket, end zone and defend your side. Basketball, hockey, soccer, football, field hockey, rugby, foosball, water polo, polo
Shoot it over the net in the center and keep it inbounds. Tennis, badminton, volleyball, (racquetball, handball sort of).
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Re: Olympics
How is handball in the second category?Nodack wrote:Move the object to the other end and get it in the net, hole, basket, end zone and defend your side. Basketball, hockey, soccer, football, field hockey, rugby, foosball, water polo, polo
Shoot it over the net in the center and keep it inbounds. Tennis, badminton, volleyball, (racquetball, handball sort of).
Re: Olympics
It's about hitting the ball back and forth between teams, and you get a point if the other team can't hit it back to you.Hermen wrote:How is handball in the second category?Nodack wrote:Move the object to the other end and get it in the net, hole, basket, end zone and defend your side. Basketball, hockey, soccer, football, field hockey, rugby, foosball, water polo, polo
Shoot it over the net in the center and keep it inbounds. Tennis, badminton, volleyball, (racquetball, handball sort of).
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan
Re: Olympics
I'm not sure which handball you're talking about, but on the olympics, it's this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HandballO_Gardino wrote:It's about hitting the ball back and forth between teams, and you get a point if the other team can't hit it back to you.Hermen wrote:How is handball in the second category?Nodack wrote:Move the object to the other end and get it in the net, hole, basket, end zone and defend your side. Basketball, hockey, soccer, football, field hockey, rugby, foosball, water polo, polo
Shoot it over the net in the center and keep it inbounds. Tennis, badminton, volleyball, (racquetball, handball sort of).
It's in the first category

Re: Olympics
Ha! That's awesome, I've never heard of that. I'll have to watch some.Hermen wrote:I'm not sure which handball you're talking about, but on the olympics, it's this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HandballO_Gardino wrote:It's about hitting the ball back and forth between teams, and you get a point if the other team can't hit it back to you.Hermen wrote:How is handball in the second category?Nodack wrote:Move the object to the other end and get it in the net, hole, basket, end zone and defend your side. Basketball, hockey, soccer, football, field hockey, rugby, foosball, water polo, polo
Shoot it over the net in the center and keep it inbounds. Tennis, badminton, volleyball, (racquetball, handball sort of).
It's in the first category
The Handball I grew up with is two or four players hitting a small rubber ball against a wall. Sometimes one wall, sometimes 3 or an enclosed room. It's very fast.

The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan
Re: Olympics
The concept is very similar to tennis, hence the sort of disclaimer. Remember Forest grump practicing table tennis? You flip up the other half of the table and it returns your ball so you can practice by yourself. That's basically racketball and handball only you take turns returning it. Cutthroat is where three people play. One serves and the other two are against whoever serves. I used to play racketball everyday in high school and college.
In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.
Re: Olympics
The more you know...
I've heard of racquetball but not this handball, thanks for explaining you two.

Re: Olympics
It's cool that there are two very different sports of the same name. And funny that I've never heard of the one that is internationally popular. It's like being a fan of American Football, but never having heard of soccer.
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan
Re: Olympics
Oh, and the US men's basketball team walloped Argentina after a very slow start (down 10). Next up is Spain on Friday.
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Re: Olympics
I can't bring myself to get very excited about this men's Olympic basketball team. It feels like the old Olympic teams where they just brought a bunch of mediocre alpha dogs (guys like DeRozan and H Barnes and Paul George) who don't actually form a very impressive team. I kind of want them to lose so that the USA will get serious about sending its best guys to the Olympics again.
Re: Olympics
I can't see them lose. I know they had some close games, but it's more like cat playing with mice. The difference in talent is just humongous, even Barnes and DeRozan would be top players on any other team, easily.
I hope you beat the crap out of Spain (I really don't like Spain in any team sport), and then I'll root for the other team in the finals
I hope you beat the crap out of Spain (I really don't like Spain in any team sport), and then I'll root for the other team in the finals

Re: Olympics
Boo!Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:I can't bring myself to get very excited about this men's Olympic basketball team. It feels like the old Olympic teams where they just brought a bunch of mediocre alpha dogs (guys like DeRozan and H Barnes and Paul George) who don't actually form a very impressive team. I kind of want them to lose so that the USA will get serious about sending its best guys to the Olympics again.
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway