LOLTheOriginalOriginal wrote:Because you're a crazy person.SDC wrote:i proposed alex len as a throw in for the gasol trade.Aztec Sunsfan wrote:I would prefer a PF, even better a 4/5 combo bigmen.
Gortat was profesional about it, but clearly didn't like to read the writing on the wall when we drafted Len. So, unless we trade Alex away, is unlikely that Gortat returns as a stop gap center.
RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
How about Chandler Parsons? Any chance of prying him away from the Rockets?
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
- Ring_Wanted
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:47 am
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
Longabardi comes from Thib's staff so I guess he could help Monroe, but if he wants the max or that's what takes to get him I think I'll pass. We'd still need interior scoring and strenght, that's why I am interested in Nurkic, but it seems his stock is on the rise and could be gone by #14. I'm also not too sure about taking him with my top pick, but I digress.Aztec Sunsfan wrote:Sounds about right.
I'm curious about how Hornacek could develop some defensive edge into Monroe. He has been all his career on a very disfunctional situation in Detroit, so maybe we could still develop him on that side of the ball. Having him paired either with Plumlee or Frye, even with supposed-to-be Len, would solved our frontcourt problems for years to come.
A max contract to Bledsoe is still what keeps me awake at night. Sounds to me like an Eric Gordon contract all over again. And the Pelicans are not so happy with the value obtained after matching our offer. But it looks like the ghost of Joe Johnson still haunts Sarver &Co., so all that will takes to sign Bledsoe to a max contract is an offer sheet. Under 10mill would be a fair deal to me. He wasn't even our best backcourt player this year.
As for Bledsoe, I am willing to take the risk if the med staff is as well. The thing is that we as fans don't ever really know. At least it is a lesser injury than Gordon's. Partially removed meniscus is less scary than cartilage damage, but the way he plays and is built certainly warrants concern.
- Ring_Wanted
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:47 am
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
Hayward doesn't replace Bledsoe. He'd be a terrific complement to him and Goran, but you still need Bledsoe's abilities.SDC wrote:good. if suns can sign him up, there's no need for bledsoe.Ring_Wanted wrote:
But my absolutely first option for the wing this summer would be Hayward. There were rumors early in the season that McD was planning making an unmatchable offer for him, but it remains tobe seen if that's what he actually pursues. All I know is that Hayward has an extremely complete skillset, has the size, doesn't glaringly lack athleticism and is young enough to be worth our attention. If we were to spend heavily this summer he'd be my choice above Monroe.
- Ring_Wanted
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:47 am
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
First he needs to have his contract status solved. Morey can make him RFA this summer, or keep him for the min and let him become unrestricted next year. If he hits the market this offseason I'd be interested for sure.Superbone wrote:How about Chandler Parsons? Any chance of prying him away from the Rockets?
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
if the suns want to keep the team intact, all it needs is one more big man, not another small forward.Superbone wrote:How about Chandler Parsons? Any chance of prying him away from the Rockets?
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
I could see Houston dangling Parsons for a PG, but I'm sure I'd make that move. If Parsons is moved I'd bet its for Rondo.
Love, Hurts.
- Ring_Wanted
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:47 am
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
Ainge would need to make up his mind first regarding the direction he wants to take Boston. I think they'd be better off using their assets to acquire a PF with range. Another ballhandler would take away from Harden and Rondo's offense is too limited to be worth it, in my opinion. I think the PG they really need is one with real perimeter defense plus three point shooting, no need for a star there.
- SwingMan
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:08 pm
- Location: Hell's Outhouse - a.k.a. Buckeye, Az.
- Contact:
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
Len has missed half the season due to ankle surgery recouping and hasn't yet had SL or any type of training camp behind him - the above is why I keep needing to state this. Unwarranted slants.Ring_Wanted wrote: The problem with these underachieving high picks like our own Alex Len.....
I was down on the Len pick initially, but I know enough that his run this season most certainly does not signify underachievement. The kid's barely gotten a chance - in part due to finding ourselves in the playoff hunt for most of the damn season.
Lay off Len until you see what he brings after a regular, full offseason and no ankle issues (knock on wood, no issues were reported the entire 2nd half of the season) - if he shows zero progress afterwards (throughout the season), then the above might be warranted. If he shows significant progress like I envision, prepare to eat crow.
Simple.
- Ring_Wanted
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:47 am
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
You don't need to call me out on Len, and I certainly don't need to prepare to eat anything. I've been saying all season long that I won't judge Len until next year, the soonest. I've pointed at his significant potential and I've applauded him at the slightest sight of any kind of production, from defensive presence, to offensive rebounding, to his midrange shot form. I didn't even have a fav prospect last draft.SwingMan wrote:Len has missed half the season due to ankle surgery recouping and hasn't yet had SL or any type of training camp behind him - the above is why I keep needing to state this. Unwarranted slants.Ring_Wanted wrote: The problem with these underachieving high picks like our own Alex Len.....
I was down on the Len pick initially, but I know enough that his run this season most certainly does not signify underachievement. The kid's barely gotten a chance - in part due to finding ourselves in the playoff hunt for most of the damn season.
Lay off Len until you see what he brings after a regular, full offseason and no ankle issues (knock on wood, no issues were reported the entire 2nd half of the season) - if he shows zero progress afterwards (throughout the season), then the above might be warranted. If he shows significant progress like I envision, prepare to eat crow.
Simple.
The point is that in the case he doesn't improve, or is unable to endure consistent playing time, his salary as a high lottery pick becomes an issue as it enters rotation role player territory (around 4M in year three). I don't know how you can jump or take exception at that.
- SwingMan
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:08 pm
- Location: Hell's Outhouse - a.k.a. Buckeye, Az.
- Contact:
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
If you've been "saying all season long that I won't judge Len until next year, the soonest" then why would you talk about him like "The problem with these underachieving high picks like our own Alex Len" ? You're contradicting yourself, big time.Ring_Wanted wrote:You don't need to call me out on Len, and I certainly don't need to prepare to eat anything. I've been saying all season long that I won't judge Len until next year, the soonest. I've pointed at his significant potential and I've applauded him at the slightest sight of any kind of production, from defensive presence, to offensive rebounding, to his midrange shot form. I didn't even have a fav prospect last draft.SwingMan wrote:Len has missed half the season due to ankle surgery recouping and hasn't yet had SL or any type of training camp behind him - the above is why I keep needing to state this. Unwarranted slants.Ring_Wanted wrote: The problem with these underachieving high picks like our own Alex Len.....
I was down on the Len pick initially, but I know enough that his run this season most certainly does not signify underachievement. The kid's barely gotten a chance - in part due to finding ourselves in the playoff hunt for most of the damn season.
Lay off Len until you see what he brings after a regular, full offseason and no ankle issues (knock on wood, no issues were reported the entire 2nd half of the season) - if he shows zero progress afterwards (throughout the season), then the above might be warranted. If he shows significant progress like I envision, prepare to eat crow.
Simple.
The point is that in the case he doesn't improve, or is unable to endure consistent playing time, his salary as a high lottery pick becomes an issue as it enters rotation role player territory (around 4M in year three). I don't know how you can jump or take exception at that.
Take it one year at a time.....
- Ring_Wanted
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:47 am
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
Yes, there was a contradiction. Probably a bad choice of words as my stance about him has been consistent all year and it can be condensed in one single word, patience. Thanks for the advice, tho.
- SwingMan
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:08 pm
- Location: Hell's Outhouse - a.k.a. Buckeye, Az.
- Contact:
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
And it's not just you - apologies if it seemed like I was singling you out.Ring_Wanted wrote:Yes, there was a contradiction. Probably a bad choice of words as my stance about him has been consistent all year and it can be condensed in one single word, patience. Thanks for the advice, tho.
Seems to be a general feeling that Len has underachieved when one looks merely at stats & games played, not realizing the lack of any training camp, summer league etc. Thing about this year is Len is staying in Phoenix for the entire off-season in part to help make up for time lost due to not being able to practice and play last year.
Again - knock on wood, there hasn't been any ankle issues reported since he came back in the 2nd half of the season, so, with a full staff present, he'll be gaining knowledge and getting himself into peak physical condition. The rest will be game experience - which will not happen if we logjam with a retread like Gortat, Pau Gasol or somesuch.
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
It seems to be a talking point that people try to pile on, that Len is an underachieving high pick bust. I understand why they would say that, and I think it's only natural that people, who were down on the pick, would continue to feel justified with a slow start, regardless the reason.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
Not specifically this forum, but loads of Suns fans are of the opinion Len = bust, shoulda drafted Noel!
Wait, what?
Wait, what?
Love, Hurts.
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
Harrison Barnes had a horrible disappointing season in Golden State, but:
- he was under a dysfunctional head coach with even more dysfunctional assistant coaching relationships
- they never practiced, so I don't see how he could learn anything
- they went out and got a veteran (Iguodala) who jumped in front of Barnes and took his starting spot, greatly reducing his minutes
- he plays with a backcourt (Curry and Thompson) who take most of the shots and don't look to pass first
I still think there is a decent chance that Barnes is a good NBA player. I'd take a chance on him. But I'd still rather have a guy like Love or Hayward for sure.
- he was under a dysfunctional head coach with even more dysfunctional assistant coaching relationships
- they never practiced, so I don't see how he could learn anything
- they went out and got a veteran (Iguodala) who jumped in front of Barnes and took his starting spot, greatly reducing his minutes
- he plays with a backcourt (Curry and Thompson) who take most of the shots and don't look to pass first
I still think there is a decent chance that Barnes is a good NBA player. I'd take a chance on him. But I'd still rather have a guy like Love or Hayward for sure.
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
I've never been a fan of Barnes. Not that i have anything against him, i just thought he was overrated at UNC and think he's a role player. I said he was Marvin Williams coming out and people scoffed. Inconsistent, not really great at anything, more of a physical specimen that looks the part as opposed to having actual game. I think the reasons you listed above Mori are excuses. Curry, Thompson, Lee, Green, even Bogut weren't affected by Jackson and the coaching staff dysfunction. Iguodala missed a bunch of time and Barnes still couldn't break through. And he was losing minutes to Green as well. Dudes a 4th option at best.
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
I agree that I wouldn't want to pay the guy big money, no way. I just meant that I'm not totally convinced that he is worthless. He's still VERY young, let's not forget. I think he'd be worth bringing in the Warriors decided to get rid of him on the cheap, but I wouldn't go much further than that.
- SwingMan
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:08 pm
- Location: Hell's Outhouse - a.k.a. Buckeye, Az.
- Contact:
Re: RC Buford: Executive Of The Year
I'd still say no - as others have said (though more politely), kid's shown himself to be a slow learner at best. Not worth the trouble of putting together a deal, IMO.Mori Chu wrote:I agree that I wouldn't want to pay the guy big money, no way. I just meant that I'm not totally convinced that he is worthless. He's still VERY young, let's not forget. I think he'd be worth bringing in the Warriors decided to get rid of him on the cheap, but I wouldn't go much further than that.