Phx-Suns.Net

iLLmatic wrote:

specialsauce wrote:

Indy wrote:

specialsauce wrote:
Bledsoe in chill mode......his act is getting old real fast. If he just had a consistent motor he would be great.

Really? The guy leads us in assists nearly every night, and rebounding every other night. I know he takes some plays off on D when he doesn't get the call, but if chill mode is 12/7/6 with a block, steal and only 1 TO, while his teammate is having a career scoring night, I'll take it.

Not what I expect with $70 million. He has all the tools to be a 20 ppg scorer. He could avg 20/5/5 if he wanted to. And I don't buy that it's from a lack of touches because he gets the ball plenty. I just wish he would attack the rim more and with less hesitancy. The great games he's had (against Thunder, Clippers, etc) are when he's aggressive.

Honest question to anybody who's reading this..who would you rather have, Bledsoe @ 5 years for 70 million or Lowry @ 4 years for 48?

Lol, I can't stand Lowry. No-win situation for me.

INFORMER wrote:

iLLmatic wrote:

specialsauce wrote:

Indy wrote:

specialsauce wrote:
Bledsoe in chill mode......his act is getting old real fast. If he just had a consistent motor he would be great.

Really? The guy leads us in assists nearly every night, and rebounding every other night. I know he takes some plays off on D when he doesn't get the call, but if chill mode is 12/7/6 with a block, steal and only 1 TO, while his teammate is having a career scoring night, I'll take it.

Not what I expect with $70 million. He has all the tools to be a 20 ppg scorer. He could avg 20/5/5 if he wanted to. And I don't buy that it's from a lack of touches because he gets the ball plenty. I just wish he would attack the rim more and with less hesitancy. The great games he's had (against Thunder, Clippers, etc) are when he's aggressive.

Honest question to anybody who's reading this..who would you rather have, Bledsoe @ 5 years for 70 million or Lowry @ 4 years for 48?

Lol, I can't stand Lowry. No-win situation for me.

Mori Chu wrote:That was a fun game. Suns took care of business and beat a Cavs team that is somehow only .500 despite being crowned by almost everyone before the season began.

They are who we thought they were! If you wanna crown 'em, then crown their asses!

To get my Suns fix, I just watched the last quarter and a half of the Cavs game. This time the Cleveland broadcast. I didn't realize how quickly the Cavs had erased our 19 point lead. It was less than 3 minutes to go in the 3rd when we were up 19 and then it was 6 at the end of the quarter! But it was sure great to see us counter every punch we took from the Cavs after the game was tied. Huge offensive rebound by Tucker to seal it.

The end of the 3rd was a nightmare. We were up 11 and screwed up our last possession. Cavs hit a basket. They steal the ball, hit another 3. Now they're only down 6 when it should have been an 11-13 point deficit. I was swearing at the TV.

Yeah, how many times have we seen that happen watching basketball? One team is up gettng near halftime and gets lethargic and the other team gets desperate, overplays, gambles and a lot of times it pays off. It must drive coaches crazy.