A place for fans of the Phoenix Suns
https://www.phx-suns.net/
Don't underestimate how much Klay is deferring to Curry and Durant. He would average Kawhi-esque numbers if he led his own team.Split T wrote:Fully healthy, who would you rather have, Khris Middleton or Klay Thompson?
Klay is everything you could want from a 3&D player in a time where 3&D guys are the shit, he's so elite in his role on both ends he would be a great fit on any team. Green is a tasmanian devil (or a superstar) on defense while also providing playmaking and floor stretching on offense. In a league full of scoring guards and a need for defensive versatility, any team would want him.bajanguy008 wrote:ShelC wrote:Personally, I don't really care. If you're a great player in the league, you're defined by rings. And with the Ws, as much as they had a big 3 with Curry, Klay and Draymond, I think it's looking like it was really Curry and two amazing role players, not Curry and another superstar. So while the Ws were stacked, they played much more team ball, which I think has and will continue to evolve to where Curry and Durant are the alphas on the team.
For the league, I think NBA fans are probably frustrated that the superstars are joining up and that their teams - even the really good ones - don't stand much of a chance. But I also think it's a superstar league and fans want to see the best compete for titles. Curry, Durant, LeBron, Kyrie plus Klay, Draymond and Kevin Love...that's some good talent on the court.
The problem comes if/when GS rips off 2-3-4 titles in a row with no competition. That could've been the case this year had they won last year and my feelings might be different.
I really agree with your first paragraph. Two superstars and two amazing role players, Klay looks more n more like a very good 3 and D guy the way he's being used and Draymond just doing his thing. The thing about the Warriors is the personnel fit, teams try to join up stars will always be more likely to be like the Heat n Cavs, with two or all three being ball dominant and someone having to become the 3rd wheel and have their numbers really suffer. The fact the stars on Ws are all shooters that can space who don't need heavy usage rates to be effective as oppose to slashers/scorers it's gonna be hard for other teams to find that mix trying to form a " big 3" that works
I also like Middleton a lot, but you might be selling Klay a bit short on defense. He does seem more well-rounded on offense than Klay though. It probably depends on what you need for your team. If you have enough ball handlers, Klay is your guy. If you need another playmaker, you might prefer Middleton.Split T wrote:I think Middleton is one of the most underrated players in the league. He's an 18/4/4 guy who shoots 40% from 3 and plays great D. He does about everything you'd want from a wing player. Klay is the better shooter, slightly higher percentage and I imagine on higher difficulty, but I think Middleton is better at everything else.
I agree.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:Don't underestimate how much Klay is deferring to Curry and Durant. He would average Kawhi-esque numbers if he led his own team.Split T wrote:Fully healthy, who would you rather have, Khris Middleton or Klay Thompson?
I guess it's possible, but I don't buy this argument. He's never been an iso scorer, he's a catch and shoot guy, even in college when he didn't have Curry. Don't underestimate how having Curry and Durant gets him better looks.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:I agree.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:Don't underestimate how much Klay is deferring to Curry and Durant. He would average Kawhi-esque numbers if he led his own team.Split T wrote:Fully healthy, who would you rather have, Khris Middleton or Klay Thompson?
Not trying to sell Klay short, I think he's great on defense. I just think Middleton is a great defender too.Hermen wrote:I also like Middleton a lot, but you might be selling Klay a bit short on defense. He does seem more well-rounded on offense than Klay though. It probably depends on what you need for your team. If you have enough ball handlers, Klay is your guy. If you need another playmaker, you might prefer Middleton.Split T wrote:I think Middleton is one of the most underrated players in the league. He's an 18/4/4 guy who shoots 40% from 3 and plays great D. He does about everything you'd want from a wing player. Klay is the better shooter, slightly higher percentage and I imagine on higher difficulty, but I think Middleton is better at everything else.
I know he primarily played sf this year with Wade on the team with him, but I would add Butler to this list and one of the best.Split T wrote:I guess it's possible, but I don't buy this argument. He's never been an iso scorer, he's a catch and shoot guy, even in college when he didn't have Curry. Don't underestimate how having Curry and Durant gets him better looks.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:I agree.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:Don't underestimate how much Klay is deferring to Curry and Durant. He would average Kawhi-esque numbers if he led his own team.Split T wrote:Fully healthy, who would you rather have, Khris Middleton or Klay Thompson?
I think Klay is a great player, he probably is the best sg in the league, but sg is by far the weakest position. It's Klay, Derozan, McCollum, and Beal. No Superstars in that group.
BookerSplit T wrote:I guess it's possible, but I don't buy this argument. He's never been an iso scorer, he's a catch and shoot guy, even in college when he didn't have Curry. Don't underestimate how having Curry and Durant gets him better looks.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:I agree.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:Don't underestimate how much Klay is deferring to Curry and Durant. He would average Kawhi-esque numbers if he led his own team.Split T wrote:Fully healthy, who would you rather have, Khris Middleton or Klay Thompson?
I think Klay is a great player, he probably is the best sg in the league, but sg is by far the weakest position. It's Klay, Derozan, McCollum, and Beal. No Superstars in that group.
I don't think it is a comparison to others at your position. To me it is, are you a clear first ballot HOFer and do you/can you carry a whole team? I think some people think of it as how famous you are, though.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:I'd take Klay over, CP3, Butler, George, Wall.
What constitutes a superstar? I would argue Draymond is probably more recognizable than KAT or Paul George. I think if youre one of the 3 best at your position, you're probably in the superstar conversation no?
Right. Tony Parker and Manu are both going to the HOF, despite neither being an All-NBA talent.In2ition wrote:BTW, if the Warriors win the next 3 or 4 titles, I would think it would be a lock that Klay is a first ballot HOFer. James Worthy was, and I wouldn't have considered him to be in the top 5 of small forwards if he played today in the league.
To me a superstar is someone who can be the best player on a championship team. I can't see Klay leading a team to a title without players better than him.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:I'd take Klay over, CP3, Butler, George, Wall.
What constitutes a superstar? I would argue Draymond is probably more recognizable than KAT or Paul George. I think if youre one of the 3 best at your position, you're probably in the superstar conversation no?
So LeBron and KD, thats it?Split T wrote:To me a superstar is someone who can be the best player on a championship team. I can't see Klay leading a team to a title without players better than him.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:I'd take Klay over, CP3, Butler, George, Wall.
What constitutes a superstar? I would argue Draymond is probably more recognizable than KAT or Paul George. I think if youre one of the 3 best at your position, you're probably in the superstar conversation no?
Curry was a superstar a couple years ago, but now he isn't it seems.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:So LeBron and KD, thats it?Split T wrote:To me a superstar is someone who can be the best player on a championship team. I can't see Klay leading a team to a title without players better than him.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:I'd take Klay over, CP3, Butler, George, Wall.
What constitutes a superstar? I would argue Draymond is probably more recognizable than KAT or Paul George. I think if youre one of the 3 best at your position, you're probably in the superstar conversation no?