Re: Suns 2014: NBA Draft
Posted: Thu Jun 19, 2014 2:34 am
He. You obviously don't. But we can let it go here. There is a long summer ahead.INFORMER wrote:I don't see a problem with using Leonard as an example in that context.
He. You obviously don't. But we can let it go here. There is a long summer ahead.INFORMER wrote:I don't see a problem with using Leonard as an example in that context.
We're one season removed. You can't predict that w/ any accuracy can you?Shabazz wrote:Sorry, INF. Compare this draft to others. Look how many superstars, all-stars, starters and role players this draft will produce. It falls short of just about every draft since 2000.
Not that one example means anything, but this draft has produced the worst catch and shoot player in the League this season. Guess the name? (by the way, the Suns have two top15 of that kind of role player)Shabazz wrote:I'm not echoing the media hacks. In terms of rookie performance this was one of the worst drafts in NBA history and I'm not counting on the other Shabazz and Mike Muscala to retroactively transform it into a great one.
Sorry, INF. Compare this draft to others. Look how many superstars, all-stars, starters and role players this draft will produce. It falls short of just about every draft since 2000.
Yep. Awful in volume and %.Sunsfan4life wrote:Ben Mclemore?
Sorry, but the 2013 draft has value. I'm not interested in judging it based on one season. I believe the majority of players I listed, if not all of them, will be significant NBA contributors. Oladipo and Greek Freak will be studs. And I didn't even mention Nerlens Noel. Is the 2014 draft superior? Of course it is. It could be one of the best since 2003. But I examine drafts independently. I look to see if I can find significant NBA contributors, guys I would want on my team, guys I think that can help me win. If I can do that, then the draft is valuable IMO.Shabazz wrote:I'm not echoing the media hacks. In terms of rookie performance this was one of the worst drafts in NBA history and I'm not counting on the other Shabazz and Mike Muscala to retroactively transform it into a great one.
Sorry, INF. Compare this draft to others. Look how many superstars, all-stars, starters and role players this draft will produce. It falls short of just about every draft since 2000.
I don't judge drafts drafts just based on how many superstars they produced. And the team that had the best player in the NBA just lost in the Finals in 5 games. The team with the second best player didn't even make it to the Finals. Superstars are important, but so are the high level complementary players. So are the fringe All-Stars. So are the above average starters.Mori Chu wrote:INF is right that the 2013 draft has a lot of NBA rotation guys in it, contributors. But the NBA title often comes down to having the right stars and leaders, and I don't see a lot of those kind of guys from last year's draft. Not a lot of guys who seem like they'll be one of the top 2-3 guys on a team someday. In that light I think it was a pretty weak draft.
Right on time, Tom Haberstroh chimes in with the best and worst draft classes in the last 25 years.INFORMER wrote:Sorry, but the 2013 draft has value. I'm not interested in judging it based on one season. I believe the majority of players I listed, if not all of them, will be significant NBA contributors. Oladipo and Greek Freak will be studs. And I didn't even mention Nerlens Noel. Is the 2014 draft superior? Of course it is. It could be one of the best since 2003. But I examine drafts independently. I look to see if I can find significant NBA contributors, guys I would want on my team, guys I think that can help me win. If I can do that, then the draft is valuable IMO.Shabazz wrote:I'm not echoing the media hacks. In terms of rookie performance this was one of the worst drafts in NBA history and I'm not counting on the other Shabazz and Mike Muscala to retroactively transform it into a great one.
Sorry, INF. Compare this draft to others. Look how many superstars, all-stars, starters and role players this draft will produce. It falls short of just about every draft since 2000.
And I think it is an incongruity, if not a little contradictory, to be excited about Alex Len but then to take such a short-sighted view of the draft class.
The fact that you're arguing that "the 2013 draft will have several significant NBA contributors" is making my point for me. BFD! Every draft has several significant NBA contributors as an influx of 60 of the top amateur athletes in the sport is supposed to. I am comparing it to other drafts based on the information we have. It falls short.Worst of the worst
1. 2013
Annual EWA: 7.3
Yes, 7.3 EWA. Michael Carter-Williams may end up as the best player in the class, and he barely shot 40 percent on a team that lost 26 straight games at one point. Granted, we have only one year of sample size, but the 2013 class has dug itself such a hole that it's hard to imagine it will be in a different spot on this list any time soon. Of the top 10 picks, only Victor Oladipo, Cody Zeller and Trey Burke posted a positive EWA last season; the 2000 class had twice as many in its rookie season. Can we just hit the reset button and lump the 2013 draft class with the 2014 class? Anyone opposed to that?
Indeed. I'm surprised you remembered. At the beginning of the college season, I thought Archie looked incredible. I had him rated higher than Noel. I thought of him as a sure-fire lotto pick. But as the year went on, he looked worse and worse, which made me sour on him. At present, I'm certainly not saying the 29-pointer isn't going to amount to anything. I think there is potential there. I just think management and fans have overvalued him.Shabazz wrote: Once upon a time, INF, you were a big fan of both Len and Archie as well.
I'm not a big MCW, but this is one of the stupidest arguments ever. Tom needs to go back and look up the 1995 NBA co-rookie of the year. And putting the 26-game losing streak on him is a joke. Hinkie was trying to field a team solely composed of D-Leaguers. The depths that front office reached to field a noncompetitive roster is truly unprecedented. But don't let those silly details get in the way of your analysis.Michael Carter-Williams may end up as the best player in the class, and he barely shot 40 percent on a team that lost 26 straight games at one point.
Media hack!Shabazz wrote:Right on time, Tom Haberstroh chimes in with the best and worst draft classes in the last 25 years.