LOL!TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Len and Archie have lost that new rookie smell.. Time to move on.

LOL!TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Len and Archie have lost that new rookie smell.. Time to move on.
I didn't like Kelly Olynak then and I'm not that impressed with his first year. He was decent in stretches for a very bad team and I think he can hang in the league, but I wouldn't draft him in the top 20 of this years class and don't ever see him as a starter for a good team.INFORMER wrote:Shabazz wrote:
Len is a little different. I liked him for most of the college season. I saw some games that impressed me and some games that were quite unimpressive. Ultimately, I think the poor guard play on Maryland kind of held him back. So going into the draft process, I thought he was a solid prospect. But then I studied him a little more and became more and more impressed. I bumped him up to the guy I would draft number one. Then the news came out about his ankle injury and that was a complete deal-breaker for me. Unrelated to that development, my opinion of Kelly Olynyk grew exponentially, and he soon became my second favorite prospect, eclipsed by only Victor Oladipo, and followed by C.J. McCollum and Rudy Gobert.
I made it perfectly clear on draft night that I wasn't a fan of drafting Len or Goodwin. 'bazz, I'm assuming, was referring to how I fel about them during the college season. But don't let accuracy get in the way of your fun.Superbone wrote:LOL!TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Len and Archie have lost that new rookie smell.. Time to move on.
Fun is imperative. As you know, with your claim of McD's foot fetish and 29 pointer moniker.INFORMER wrote:I made it perfectly clear on draft night that I wasn't a fan of drafting Len or Goodwin. 'bazz, I'm assuming, was referring to how I fel about them during the college season. But don't let accuracy get in the way of your fun.Superbone wrote:LOL!TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Len and Archie have lost that new rookie smell.. Time to move on.
The "he did it but on a bad team" argument is a bit lazy, but whatever. In just his rookie season, he showed above average passing ability, offensive versatility and rebounding ability. He had several impressive outings. But none of that counts I guess. We'll just have to let time by the judge.I didn't like Kelly Olynak then and I'm not that impressed with his first year. He was decent in stretches for a very bad team and I think he can hang in the league, but I wouldn't draft him in the top 20 of this years class and don't ever see him as a starter for a good team.
I wasn't implying that 'bazz wasn't reaching the opinion on his own. I was saying he was arriving at the same opinion as many in the media who have superficial knowledge of the prospects from that draft.Sunsfan4life wrote: Also, just because people don't like last years class don't mean they are "echoing media hacks". I'm sure Shabazz watched this years rookie class, took a look at the stats as well, and came to the conclusions that this class was absolutely miserable in year 1 and only a few players look like they have a high ceiling ...It's his opinion. It's my opinion...so the whole "your letting these media hacks influence you" debate is garbage. I'm letting my eyes do it.
I can support that.Sunsfan4life wrote:I thought he definitely improved from college to his 1st yr and Hornecek seemed very encouraged by his work ethic.
Yeah, we need more point guards.Sunsfan4life wrote:So the rumor being floated by Chad Ford is if the Sixers go Exum 3 they will look to trade MCW for a pick.
Just hypothetical, but would you trade 14 for him?
1.) No SL or training camp for Len last year, thus, he had to get in shape and learn on the fly with inconsistent minutes.INFORMER wrote:Len is a little different. I liked him for most of the college season. I saw some games that impressed me and some games that were quite unimpressive. Ultimately, I think the poor guard play on Maryland kind of held him back. So going into the draft process, I thought he was a solid prospect. But then I studied him a little more and became more and more impressed. I bumped him up to the guy I would draft number one. Then the news came out about his ankle injury and that was a complete deal-breaker for me. Unrelated to that development, my opinion of Kelly Olynyk grew exponentially, and he soon became my second favorite prospect, eclipsed by only Victor Oladipo, and followed by C.J. McCollum and Rudy Gobert.
I thought Ryan draft him at 5 was reckless. And then when I watch the alleged "highlights" of Len's brief shining moments this past season, they make me cringe. So not only do I have lingering questions about his durability and longevity, I'm beginning to think he wasn't as good as even I thought pre-injury. And that he is this raw after two years of college gives me pause as well.
THIS.Superbone wrote: So much downplaying in the name of objectivity. Forget it! We're fans.
Sometimes I like to have discussions based on reality and accurate, balanced analysis. I'm sorry that bothers you.EDC wrote:What is wrong with overrating your rookies? We are fans not analysts.
I guess I used "we" inappropriately somewhere and this is your shot at me. In any event, it's confusing me because I made it very clear that this is my opinion of Alex Len and Archie Goodwin. I'm not asking anyone else to feel the same.EDC wrote:Shouldn't you be hoping for the best from them instead of making sure everyone knows that "we" didn't want them in the first place?
Wash, rinse, repeat. This same post is made toward me every offseason. I don't know what to tell you. I'm sorry I don't love or approve of everything the Suns do. I'm sorry I don't automatically think what they do is right. I reserve my own judgment and evaluate each occurrence based on what I believe and my understanding. I don't set out to be negative; I just have opinions and reactions. Sometimes they're positive, sometimes they're negative. But they'll always be true to what I personally think. I don't see any point to be positive just to be positive, or negative just to be negative.EDC wrote:So much negativity.
Ouch. I'm not trying to act like a know-it-all. I'm just stating my opinion. For what it's worth, I don't see any correlation between negativity and being knowledgeable. So this syndrome your slamming me with doesn't really resonate with me. I'm sorry.Aztec Sunsfan wrote:The usual "Maybe, the more negative I speak, the more knowledgeable I look" syndrome is taking over Inf.
I'm reading this after I made the reply to EDC, so if that reply constitutes more of the same " 'tude" you're referring to, I apologize.carey wrote:Wish you'd take the 'tude down a notch though.