Re: All Things Ayton
Posted: Sun Jul 02, 2023 5:38 pm
I do think we can now survive an injury to one of the Big 3.5 with Gordon in the mix.Flagrant Fowl wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 4:28 pmAs Bob said, health is always the X-factor. To that point, at least we no longer have to worry about leaning into Chris Paul ball only for him to eventually miss games in the Playoffs. I hope Kevin Young has something cooked up to balance the offensive workload.
AgreeFlagrant Fowl wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 5:57 pmThe cap goes up every year, so this was always going to be the perception as long as he's not out with a major injury.
He's still overpaid by about $10M/year.
Can't ask for a better setup, no?Superbone wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 3:49 pmIF Ayton buys in to Vogel and understands what a great situation he is in, he could have a career year. A lot of ifs but I'm feeling pretty good about this upcoming season based on what I know about the FAs we have acquired. And then Gordon was the cherry on top for me. This upcoming season on paper is probably our best shot at an NBA Championship in our 55 year history!
I don't get this take.
Exactly.BKinSJC wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 1:30 pmWe really don't know yet that the team is "fine". Like a lot of people on this message board, I'm intrigued with the possibilities of some of these potential 5th-9th guys that the front office picked up. But it's far from a guarantee that any of them will actually be playable in a playoff series, when it matters.
As opposed to the terrible situation he has been forced to play in these last few years?
I love these fake either/or scenarios. How about neither?virtual9mm wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 10:55 amOne serious question. Would you rather pay Ayton what he is making or Sabonis 43.4mm per year for the next 5 years?
Well I still don’t want him on a max deal, but Lopez and Poeltl getting overpaid makes it more palatable to me.INFORMER wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 5:30 amI don't get this take.
Milwaukee won a championship with Brook Lopez playing a very important role. Runner-up DPOY. The $24 mil a year salary is steep, but it's a 2-year deal. Plus, he is a 2-way big that hits 3s. Those don't grow on trees.
Poeltl got $20 mil a year. He didn't average 30 minutes per game and put up 12.5 ppg, 9.7 rpg, 2.7 apg, 1.2 bpg, and shot 62 FG%. Jarrett Allen got $20 mil a year a couple of years ago. So I don't see what's the big deal.
Neither of these situations makes me want the part-timer on a max deal. Not even remotely.
If it wasn't obvious, it was a rhetorical question. The kind of contract Ayton is getting is the new normal. Of course, there's going to be a lot of buyer's regret. But it's clear that Ayton's deal isn't some kind of outlier.INFORMER wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 5:44 amI love these fake either/or scenarios. How about neither?virtual9mm wrote: ↑Sun Jul 02, 2023 10:55 amOne serious question. Would you rather pay Ayton what he is making or Sabonis 43.4mm per year for the next 5 years?
And what you have to remember is context. Sacramento has been able to accomplish anything since the early 2000s. They are overreacting to their first good season in a long time.
There will always be other teams that make bad decisions. It isn't good business to justify your bad decisions by point to others'.
I don't think that is accurate at all. People didn't think Ayton's contract was an outlier; they just didn't think he was/is worth a max contract. I don't think Sabonis extension, Lopez's deal, or Poeltl's changes that. If the take is that "well those guys got overpaid so it's ok that we overpaid Ayton"; I can't subscribe to that. Guys getting overpaid isn't new, and again, just because one team does it, doesn't mean another should.virtual9mm wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 8:57 amIf it wasn't obvious, it was a rhetorical question. The kind of contract Ayton is getting is the new normal. Of course, there's going to be a lot of buyer's regret. But it's clear that Ayton's deal isn't some kind of outlier.
Again, this isn't accurate. No one was hoping for guys like Keita Bates-Diop, Drew Eubanks, and Yuta Watanabe as a trade return for Ayton. Not even close. Those are great for the minimum. Unfortunately, if they're good, we won't have a chance to retain them because we don't have their bird rights. Guys that we bring in via trade, we would have their bird rights.virtual9mm wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 8:57 amNow, the Suns still have Ayton and have depth just as good as a trade might have netted.
LOL, for what?! Did I miss the 2023-24 season? Is it already over? Ayton won DPOY? He averaged 20/10?!virtual9mm wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 8:57 amI think Jeremy deserves some credit here despite his hyperbolic tendencies.
Lots of folks were advocating for trading Ayton for the kinds of players we ended up signing for the minimum, less so recently (thankfully) but more so earlier. Jeremy was one of the few voices against this, although I would bet that a silent majority concurred. Credit where credit is due although I also think Jeremy sometimes says bat shit crazy stuff. And he's been demonized here.INFORMER wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 9:53 amI don't think that is accurate at all. People didn't think Ayton's contract was an outlier; they just didn't think he was/is worth a max contract. I don't think Sabonis extension, Lopez's deal, or Poeltl's changes that. If the take is that "well those guys got overpaid so it's ok that we overpaid Ayton"; I can't subscribe to that. Guys getting overpaid isn't new, and again, just because one team does it, doesn't mean another should.virtual9mm wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 8:57 amIf it wasn't obvious, it was a rhetorical question. The kind of contract Ayton is getting is the new normal. Of course, there's going to be a lot of buyer's regret. But it's clear that Ayton's deal isn't some kind of outlier.
You can point to those examples, but someone can just as easily point to the bargains Naz Reid and Thomas Bryant were signed to.
Again, this isn't accurate. No one was hoping for guys like Keita Bates-Diop, Drew Eubanks, and Yuta Watanabe as a trade return for Ayton. Not even close. Those are great for the minimum. Unfortunately, if they're good, we won't have a chance to retain them because we don't have their bird rights. Guys that we bring in via trade, we would have their bird rights.virtual9mm wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 8:57 amNow, the Suns still have Ayton and have depth just as good as a trade might have netted.
LOL, for what?! Did I miss the 2023-24 season? Is it already over? Ayton won DPOY? He averaged 20/10?!virtual9mm wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 8:57 amI think Jeremy deserves some credit here despite his hyperbolic tendencies.
Those three players averaged 56 shots per game last season. And there’s 90 shots available per game. So what’s the problem?INFORMER wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 5:41 amAs opposed to the terrible situation he has been forced to play in these last few years?
I get him and Monty did not have a good relationship, but it wasn't like it started that way from day one. When this team/organization turned the corner in the Bubble, it was Ayton who decided to play like garbage. Before that, it was his suspension. So those two things probably led to the relationship going sideways (along with Monty's devotion to the "Point god")
We've been told that Ayton needs touches to play hard. So how is playing with three elite scorers who each demand/deserve 20+ shots per game a great situation for him?
Decided to bring this over from the Gordon thread…
Mason Plumlee got 1 year, $5 million.Split T wrote: ↑Mon Jul 03, 2023 10:52 amMy thing is it shows the league still values non superstar centers. The market was still there for role playing bigs to get 20 million plus a year. Ayton is at 30 million plus and I’m not saying I’m ok with that now…but it makes me feel better that we can actually find a trade for him because someone will still value Ayton at that price.
I still think it was a bad deal and I want to move him. I just feel better about our chances now that I’m seeing what type of contracts role playing bigs are getting. He went from way overpaid to just overpaid in my mind.