Re: SL Game Day: Rockets (1-1) @ Suns (1-1), Mon 7/10/17
Posted: Mon Jul 10, 2017 2:23 pm
Immediately that falls on the coaching staff, but McDonough is responsible for hiring said coaching staff.
A place for fans of the Phoenix Suns
https://www.phx-suns.net/
And Sarver is responsible for hiring McD so it really starts with him I guess- tempered a little by the fact that, afaict, Sarver stays out of basketball decisions so might be a little removed from basketball operations.iLLmatic wrote:Immediately that falls on the coaching staff, but McDonough is responsible for hiring said coaching staff.
Booker was the obvious choice at 13, I think everybody on this board wanted Booker there. Admittedly I liked Len at 5, but I also liked CJ too. I did not like Bender or Chriss, the guys on the radio were having orgasms over that deal like McDonough pulled off some sort of miracle. I felt like it was so-so at the time because both players were unproven. Chriss being so raw and Bender a foreign prospect who was not even a starter on his previous team.ShelC wrote:I'm heading down that path with McD too. We've had some really high draft picks now and it doesn't look like there's a gamechanger/stud among them. We got Booker at 13, who's for sure a stud. But Len (5), Bender (4), Chriss (8) are questionable at the moment, with Len really looking like he's on his way out. You can't go thru this period of losing and miss on top 10 picks, or top 5 for that matter.
I still like Warren, but everyone has already assumed he's being pushed to the bench in a sixth man role. I think Ulis is too small to be a starter on a playoff caliber basketball team, sorry.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:I think you're being a bit rough on Warren and Ulis. I believe both are starter material. I dont care about Ulis' size, I 100% believe he's a starter. Agree with the rest though, hated both picks last year.
Well its a good thing we're light years away from being a playoff team eh?iLLmatic wrote:I still like Warren, but everyone has already assumed he's being pushed to the bench in a sixth man role. I think Ulis is too small to be a starter on a playoff caliber basketball team, sorry.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:I think you're being a bit rough on Warren and Ulis. I believe both are starter material. I dont care about Ulis' size, I 100% believe he's a starter. Agree with the rest though, hated both picks last year.
I just can't see TJ being pulled from the starting lineup. He is way better than Jackson, Chriss and Bender.iLLmatic wrote:I still like Warren, but everyone has already assumed he's being pushed to the bench in a sixth man role. I think Ulis is too small to be a starter on a playoff caliber basketball team, sorry.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:I think you're being a bit rough on Warren and Ulis. I believe both are starter material. I dont care about Ulis' size, I 100% believe he's a starter. Agree with the rest though, hated both picks last year.
Because I guess that's not a goal huh?TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Well its a good thing we're light years away from being a playoff team eh?iLLmatic wrote:I still like Warren, but everyone has already assumed he's being pushed to the bench in a sixth man role. I think Ulis is too small to be a starter on a playoff caliber basketball team, sorry.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:I think you're being a bit rough on Warren and Ulis. I believe both are starter material. I dont care about Ulis' size, I 100% believe he's a starter. Agree with the rest though, hated both picks last year.
Sure its the goal, doesnt mean its realistic anytime soon.iLLmatic wrote:Because I guess that's not a goal huh?TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Well its a good thing we're light years away from being a playoff team eh?iLLmatic wrote:I still like Warren, but everyone has already assumed he's being pushed to the bench in a sixth man role. I think Ulis is too small to be a starter on a playoff caliber basketball team, sorry.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:I think you're being a bit rough on Warren and Ulis. I believe both are starter material. I dont care about Ulis' size, I 100% believe he's a starter. Agree with the rest though, hated both picks last year.
I cannot stand when people say this. So if Booker was a bust, McDonaugh wouldn't be at fault? He deserves credit for this pick. It's not like Booker was Lebron James coming out.iLLmatic wrote:Booker was the obvious choice at 13, I think everybody on this board wanted Booker there. Admittedly I liked Len at 5, but I also liked CJ too. I did not like Bender or Chriss, the guys on the radio were having orgasms over that deal like McDonough pulled off some sort of miracle. I felt like it was so-so at the time because both players were unproven. Chriss being so raw and Bender a foreign prospect who was not even a starter on his previous team.ShelC wrote:I'm heading down that path with McD too. We've had some really high draft picks now and it doesn't look like there's a gamechanger/stud among them. We got Booker at 13, who's for sure a stud. But Len (5), Bender (4), Chriss (8) are questionable at the moment, with Len really looking like he's on his way out. You can't go thru this period of losing and miss on top 10 picks, or top 5 for that matter.
If you remove Booker from his draft history, you have pretty mediocre results; four of these picks were lottery picks::
Tyler Ulis - Backup PG
TJ Warren - Sixth man SF
Alex Len - On his way out
Tyler Ennis - Traded (bench fodder)
Archie Goodwin - Released
Dragan Bender - Still too raw to project (not aggressive enough)
Marquise Chriss - Still too raw to project (too aggressive in the wrong way)
Alec Brown - Who??
Bogdan Bogdanovic - Remains to be seen
Great post. The results there are less than stellar. I think we almost always took the obvious guy, especially at the top of the draft. We pretty much knew we were taking Len, knew we were taking Booker, knew we were taking Bender. I had concerns about Chriss and didn't see it with him, still don't. I hope I'm wrong. TJ is an NBA scorer but I don't know how/where he fits. Ennis was a wasted pick. Archie was a low-risk/high-reward who didn't pan out. Let's see what Bogdan does for the Kings. I think we'll regret trading him. Outside of Booker, Ulis is probably the most talented, pound for pound, guy we've drafted. I don't think he's a starter tho unfortunately.iLLmatic wrote:Booker was the obvious choice at 13, I think everybody on this board wanted Booker there. Admittedly I liked Len at 5, but I also liked CJ too. I did not like Bender or Chriss, the guys on the radio were having orgasms over that deal like McDonough pulled off some sort of miracle. I felt like it was so-so at the time because both players were unproven. Chriss being so raw and Bender a foreign prospect who was not even a starter on his previous team.ShelC wrote:I'm heading down that path with McD too. We've had some really high draft picks now and it doesn't look like there's a gamechanger/stud among them. We got Booker at 13, who's for sure a stud. But Len (5), Bender (4), Chriss (8) are questionable at the moment, with Len really looking like he's on his way out. You can't go thru this period of losing and miss on top 10 picks, or top 5 for that matter.
If you remove Booker from his draft history, you have pretty mediocre results; four of these picks were lottery picks::
Tyler Ulis - Backup PG
TJ Warren - Sixth man SF
Alex Len - On his way out
Tyler Ennis - Traded (bench fodder)
Archie Goodwin - Released
Dragan Bender - Still too raw to project (not aggressive enough)
Marquise Chriss - Still too raw to project (too aggressive in the wrong way)
Alec Brown - Who??
Bogdan Bogdanovic - Remains to be seen
ShelC wrote:Sloppy game so far and no one looks particularly good. I don't see any explosion around the rim from Chriss and he seems to be throwing up wildy shots around the rim. Lazy working for post position so he gets pushed out off the block. No feel in the post or how/where to move, tried an up and under which was OK but blew the lay-in. He's just trying to work from too far out, and his natural instinct is to pivot away and fade.
JJ got his 3pt attempt by Qi, who's a legit 7 footer. That's where his form is a hinderance.
Constant movement. Great baseline move. Also the constant movement is VERY notciable, he already has like 3 offensive rebounds. Now on the downside...he's following his own misses, haha.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:He wasnt my choice, and he cant shoot, but I love pretty much everything else about Jackson. His nose for the ball and aggressiveness are sorely needed here.