As much as people don't like Point Booker, it might be our best shot at success. I can't think of one PG skill (passing, breaking down a defense, outside shooting, running an offense) that Knight is currently better at than Book.
A lineup of Book-Bridges-JJ/TJ-Ariza-Ayton could be really nice. Replace any of those guys with Knight and it loses its luster.
I think that depends on two things:
1) Does Booker being the primary ball handler make him more or less efficient, and does it wear him down more?
2) If Knight is back to playing PG instead of SG, can he play within himself?
I am really worried that Point Book would mean seeing him miss 20 games/year, and if we ever did make it to the playoffs in coming years, less likely for him to be effective.
We are going to lose some games this year because of our PG situation, but I hope Robby and Ryan don't do anything stupid. We don't need "a different pg", we need a guy who is the right fit. It's ok to take a couple of summers building the roster, we just can't panic and screw it up.
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan
I don't think it wears him down more, especially if it's more of a passing/motion offense. If he were asked to run offense like Nash and have a high usage%, then sure. My main concern with him playing PG is that you might be taking him away from his biggest strength as primary scorer and shooter. He might be marginalized in a sense, like when MikeD had Shaq running out to the 3pt line for screens, or Porter had Nash off the ball as a shooter.
My other concern with Booker at point would be defense. He's not exactly a staunch defender at his own position, so asking him to defend the most talented position in the league might be painful to watch. We'd have to get creative with cross matches...Jackson would have to be out there to cover the PG IMO since he's probably our best perimeter defender (or has that potential outside of Harrison). Maybe Bridges can cover some but he's still only a rook. Wouldn't trust Ariza or Warren with those assignments.
I don't think it wears him down more, especially if it's more of a passing/motion offense. If he were asked to run offense like Nash and have a high usage%, then sure. My main concern with him playing PG is that you might be taking him away from his biggest strength as primary scorer and shooter. He might be marginalized in a sense, like when MikeD had Shaq running out to the 3pt line for screens, or Porter had Nash off the ball as a shooter.
My other concern with Booker at point would be defense. He's not exactly a staunch defender at his own position, so asking him to defend the most talented position in the league might be painful to watch. We'd have to get creative with cross matches...Jackson would have to be out there to cover the PG IMO since he's probably our best perimeter defender (or has that potential outside of Harrison). Maybe Bridges can cover some but he's still only a rook. Wouldn't trust Ariza or Warren with those assignments.
I know Jackson has a year of NBA play under his belt, but I would argue that Bridges is probably a better defender. Either way, we will need to make huge leaps forward on the defensive front if we are going to be markedly better than last year. Improving our offense won't be enough.
To quote Kevin Durant, "You know you guys (the Blazers) aren't going to win a championship."
“Yeah, we can’t all jump ship and sign with the odds-on favorite like you did.”
Why does KD have to be such a jerk? Somebody who wins titles the way he did it has no business mocking others for failing to win one.
“Are you crazy?! You think I’m going to go for seven years and try to get there? You enjoy the 2030 draft picks that we have holding? I want to try to see the game today.” — Ish 3/13/25
To quote Kevin Durant, "You know you guys (the Blazers) aren't going to win a championship."
“Yeah, we can’t all jump ship and sign with the odds-on favorite like you did.”
Why does KD have to be such a jerk? Somebody who wins titles the way he did it has no business mocking others for failing to win one.
Was he wrong though?
It’s probably accurate, but that doesn’t necessarily make it something he ought to say.
“Are you crazy?! You think I’m going to go for seven years and try to get there? You enjoy the 2030 draft picks that we have holding? I want to try to see the game today.” — Ish 3/13/25
Conley's contract is obscene and it feels like he's always hurt.
I LOVE his fit here, though. Defends, hits 3s, not a ball-pounder. He'd be perfect next to Booker and wouldn't cost a ton to acquire. There would be some similarities to the Nash move (a 30-year old, oft-injured PG signed to lead a group of promising but aimless young players).
Agreed that there's a ton of risk with the move.
Something like Knight/TJ/Chriss for Conley or Knight/Chandler/TJ/Chris for Conley/Jamychal Green would really balance out our roster nicely.
I don't think Lillard is looking to get out, nor are the Blazers looking to move him. If something were to happen tho, I think there are other teams that could offer more than we could at this point.
I heard Greg Moore on a podcast recently and wasn't impressed. He sounded like a typical shill who won't step out of bounds to call it what it is just to save his access to the team. Not to mention he plugged his columns at every half opportunity.
Send me a PM if you're interested in joining the phx-suns.net fantasy basketball league.
Based on this, seems like Booker, Ayton, JJ, Quese, Mikal, George King, Okobo, Shaq and Holmes are all working out together in PHX:
https://twitter.com/Suns/status/1035254245874790400
