Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion
Posted: Fri May 20, 2016 6:20 pm
Isn't 4 a huge reach though (for Sabonis) if we're going BPA? (Maybe not, you tell me. I'm not a college connoisseur.)
A place for fans of the Phoenix Suns
https://www.phx-suns.net/
Enormous.Superbone wrote:Isn't 4 a huge reach though (for Sabonis) if we're going BPA? (Maybe not, you tell me. I'm not a college connoisseur.)
Does it matter either way? If you like the guy at 13, but don't think he will be there, why not take him at 4? (I admittedly know nothing [John Snow] about NCAA basketball, but the logic bothers me to say "don't pick him that high" when you don't like anyone more.)Superbone wrote:Isn't 4 a huge reach though (for Sabonis) if we're going BPA? (Maybe not, you tell me. I'm not a college connoisseur.)
The logic to me is about value. Trade down and pick up another asset. I realize that is sort of more how things work int he NFL and not so much the NBA, but still...Indy wrote:
Does it matter either way? If you like the guy at 13, but don't think he will be there, why not take him at 4? (I admittedly know nothing [John Snow] about NCAA basketball, but the logic bothers me to say "don't pick him that high" when you don't like anyone more.)
Lets assume the top 5 for now is Simmons, Ingram, Bender, Murray, Hield.Shabazz wrote:Sabonis has a very good shot at being there at 13.
Brice Johnson or Demetrius Jackson.carey wrote:Lets assume the top 5 for now is Simmons, Ingram, Bender, Murray, Hield.Shabazz wrote:Sabonis has a very good shot at being there at 13.
The next 7 in some order will likely be Chriss, Ellenson, Davis, Dunn, Poetl, Brown, and Valentine.
That leaves us a shot at Sabonis, Skal and Luwau.
Who do you take?
Ok, but in this draft, how much is #4 worth compared to 10?carey wrote:The logic to me is about value. Trade down and pick up another asset. I realize that is sort of more how things work int he NFL and not so much the NBA, but still...Indy wrote:
Does it matter either way? If you like the guy at 13, but don't think he will be there, why not take him at 4? (I admittedly know nothing [John Snow] about NCAA basketball, but the logic bothers me to say "don't pick him that high" when you don't like anyone more.)
Depends on whether or not Bender is there and how much you value him. Could be massive for some teams.Indy wrote:Ok, but in this draft, how much is #4 worth compared to 10?carey wrote:The logic to me is about value. Trade down and pick up another asset. I realize that is sort of more how things work int he NFL and not so much the NBA, but still...Indy wrote:
Does it matter either way? If you like the guy at 13, but don't think he will be there, why not take him at 4? (I admittedly know nothing [John Snow] about NCAA basketball, but the logic bothers me to say "don't pick him that high" when you don't like anyone more.)
Is he any good? I just watched a couple of sizzle reels on Youtube but it's hard to take much from those.•Oregon State G Gary Payton II: I know several here are fans of him as a 2nd rounder. Looks intriguing
Mmh, i wouldn't mind having a Zeller or Kaminsky type player. The name "Sabonis" is very enticing for me. That would be a nice pick at 13.UglyTruth wrote:I find Sabonis to be overrated. His athleticism and wingspan are worse than Kevin Love while having no where near the outside shooting ability or rebounding that Love had.
Charlotte should take Sabonis so they can add him to their tier of Zeller, Kaminsky, Hansbrough and Hawes.
Did you only watch the final four? (Like me)TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Brice Johnson or Demetrius Jackson.carey wrote:Lets assume the top 5 for now is Simmons, Ingram, Bender, Murray, Hield.Shabazz wrote:Sabonis has a very good shot at being there at 13.
The next 7 in some order will likely be Chriss, Ellenson, Davis, Dunn, Poetl, Brown, and Valentine.
That leaves us a shot at Sabonis, Skal and Luwau.
Who do you take?
Excellent choices, Split.Split T wrote: I'd rather use that wash pick on Valentine, luwawa or sabonis.
He is.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:Is he any good?•Oregon State G Gary Payton II: I know several here are fans of him as a 2nd rounder. Looks intriguing
Mori he looks like he has some great tools in terms of speed, build and athletic ability. Should be an instant contributor on defence. Like the other younger payton his offense will take some time. He hasn't been playing pg for that long, so there is still some development to go there. Could he slot into the Ronnie price role. I say yes.INFORMER wrote:He is.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:Is he any good?•Oregon State G Gary Payton II: I know several here are fans of him as a 2nd rounder. Looks intriguing