Re: Suns News: Week 16 1/28-2/3
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:16 pm
A place for fans of the Phoenix Suns
https://www.phx-suns.net/
So we can agree that Warren is good at scoring relative to NBA talent. What does Josh Jackson do that's good currently? We want to trade away a known commodity for something that could be that's not showing right now? I'm not impressed with JJs defense nor his rebounding, he's only averaging .1 more than Warren this year.Indy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:05 pmTo me it depends on if we need better scoring or better rebounding and defense. No question that TJ is far and away better at scoring. But he doesn't defend or rebound. I think Jackson can be good at both, but I know he is far away from being that right now. To me it is a gamble, but if I had to choose between JJ and TJ being a better fit in the future, I think JJ has a better chance to be what we need next to Booker than TJ.
All of this is assuming we are looking at 2 years from now to be competing for a playoff spot.
No one is arguing Jackson is better than warren right now. But he is better as a defender and a rebounder. He may only be averaging .1 rebounds more, but that’s in less minutes. JJ has a rebound rate of 10.0, warren is at 7.2iLLmatic wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:24 pmSo we can agree that Warren is good at scoring relative to NBA talent. What does Josh Jackson do that's good currently? We want to trade away a known commodity for something that could be that's not showing right now? I'm not impressed with JJs defense nor his rebounding, he's only averaging .1 more than Warren this year.Indy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:05 pmTo me it depends on if we need better scoring or better rebounding and defense. No question that TJ is far and away better at scoring. But he doesn't defend or rebound. I think Jackson can be good at both, but I know he is far away from being that right now. To me it is a gamble, but if I had to choose between JJ and TJ being a better fit in the future, I think JJ has a better chance to be what we need next to Booker than TJ.
All of this is assuming we are looking at 2 years from now to be competing for a playoff spot.
That was my point. And that rebounding rate for Josh is him only playing 2% of his minutes at the 4, where TJ has played 99% of his minutes there. It is significant.Split T wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:42 pmNo one is arguing Jackson is better than warren right now. But he is better as a defender and a rebounder. He may only be averaging .1 rebounds more, but that’s in less minutes. JJ has a rebound rate of 10.0, warren is at 7.2iLLmatic wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:24 pmSo we can agree that Warren is good at scoring relative to NBA talent. What does Josh Jackson do that's good currently? We want to trade away a known commodity for something that could be that's not showing right now? I'm not impressed with JJs defense nor his rebounding, he's only averaging .1 more than Warren this year.Indy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 2:05 pmTo me it depends on if we need better scoring or better rebounding and defense. No question that TJ is far and away better at scoring. But he doesn't defend or rebound. I think Jackson can be good at both, but I know he is far away from being that right now. To me it is a gamble, but if I had to choose between JJ and TJ being a better fit in the future, I think JJ has a better chance to be what we need next to Booker than TJ.
All of this is assuming we are looking at 2 years from now to be competing for a playoff spot.
I don't know. Kind of the same questions we have about Ayton. Yeah, he looks like a 20/10 guy by next year, but he doesn't score through anyone, and doesn't rebound over anyone, and doesn't stop FGA at the basket. Is that what we need in a #1 pick at the center spot?ShelC wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 3:00 pmAnd Jackson's ballhandling/distributing shouldn't be overlooked.
But back to TJ as a 6th man/primary scorer...it's how he scores that's troublesome. Again, no real go-to moves - doesn't play in the post, isn't an ISO player, isn't a real off the dribble threat, not really a slasher. He's all of those things in transition or off broken plays. Does that work as a 6th man?
I am extremely lucky that when my sons were that age, we were at the start of the Nash years.Indy wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 3:03 pmI don't know. Kind of the same questions we have about Ayton. Yeah, he looks like a 20/10 guy by next year, but he doesn't score through anyone, and doesn't rebound over anyone, and doesn't stop FGA at the basket. Is that what we need in a #1 pick at the center spot?ShelC wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 3:00 pmAnd Jackson's ballhandling/distributing shouldn't be overlooked.
But back to TJ as a 6th man/primary scorer...it's how he scores that's troublesome. Again, no real go-to moves - doesn't play in the post, isn't an ISO player, isn't a real off the dribble threat, not really a slasher. He's all of those things in transition or off broken plays. Does that work as a 6th man?
I am just so frustrated with our team construction.
My son is really into basketball now, and he is just about to turn 10. He has never known a time in his life when the Suns we relevant...
You think he will get more aggressive? That doesn't seem to be something that increases. You either have it or your don't. I assumed with him coming out as the #1 pick, and easily losing the rookie of the year battle, he would have a big enough chip on his shoulder to be aggressive. I just don't see it.ShelC wrote: ↑Tue Feb 05, 2019 3:18 pmI think Ayton will be a legit post threat once we run offense thru him. I'm fine with his rebounding simply because of the space he takes up and I think as long as he's willing to work, he'll get better with his focus, aggression, and timing on the defensive end. Even just being in position to change shots is what we need. But a legit PF to also grab boards and protect the rim will help a ton.
It's why we need the right players at PG, SF and PF.
that trade for oubre still doesnt make any sense.
I do think James Jones wouldn't mind helping Lebron and the Lakers. I think you're right that Sarver intervened to stop an Ariza trade to the Lakers, but I worry that in the pursuit of Lonzo Ball, Sarver will get talked into giving up too many/valuable assets like our own 1st round pick.SDC wrote: ↑Wed Feb 06, 2019 1:50 amthat trade for oubre still doesnt make any sense.
originally, james jones was going to help lebron by trading ariza to the lakers right? sarver intervened to stop this. then we found out a 3 team trade fell apart, and phx, being impatient, dealt ariza to the wiz directly.
james jones' default position is to always help the lakers first.