Re: Durant traded to Rockets
Posted: Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:55 pm
One thing's for sure, we fixed the paint tonight.
I was thinking about you just today, Gene. When the Suns "fixed the paint" in a matter of minutes with Maluach and Williams.Uncle_Gene wrote: ↑Wed Jun 25, 2025 6:49 pmHow's everything folks ? Long time, no see. Hope everything has been good with all of you. Now for Gene's 2¢. I know I'm a few days late.
For what the Suns got back in the Durant deal, I can't complain too much. The best offensive player and arguably the best defensive player from the 2nd seed in the West (Green and Brooks) came back in return. A 1st rounder and five 2nd round picks I think is decent for a man that is still a great player and will be 37 years old in September.
Jalen Green it's crazy athletic, can put the ball on the floor and get to the basket. Suns could definitely use a player like that. Dillon Brooks is the defensive player Suns need on the wing.
We all know the roster isn't complete and there's more moves to be made. However, the sports analysts giving the Suns grades of C- and D- is crazy. There just weren't that many offers out there, plain and simple.
I wish things would have worked out with that squad, but there was too much roster imbalance and changes needed to be made. Can't wait till Monday when the free agent period opens up. It's going to be very interesting and I'm ready for the next chapter of Suns basketball.
https://www.chron.com/sports/rockets/ar ... 388585.phpFeel free to dismiss Green's often-disastrous two years under former coach Stephen Silas if you'd like. Year 2 for Green under current coach Ime Udoka wasn't significantly better than Year 1, with Green showing similar oscillation between strong performances and games of noticeable absence. Green excelled in December and January, then delivered a more average February and March. He shot an impressive 44.6 percent from the field and 37.1 percent from three during Houston wins. Those numbers dropped to 38.1 percent from the field and 32.3 percent from three in Houston losses. Green was among the 23 players to score 1,500 points last season. He finished No. 21 in field-goal percentage in that group, only making modest strides as a playmaker.
Maybe Green jumps to around 25 points per game in 2025-26, either alongside Phoenix star Devin Booker or a yet-to-be-revealed cast in another location. Ultimately, unless proven otherwise, I suspect Green's scoring ability is more akin to shooting guards described as fringe All-Stars rather than playoff-caliber leading men. Green's scoring thus far resembles a large bag of chips. Considerable in volume, but ultimately empty calories.
Green, despite the aforementioned warts, could still notch an All-Star appearance or two this decade, and he is athletic enough to potentially lead a multi-round playoff team if he refines his shot selection and three-point stroke.
Do you feel that there's any reason for us to hope that Jalen Green unlocks something / grows as a player while he's here.... perhaps enough to live up to his draft status?INFORMER wrote: ↑Sat Jun 28, 2025 10:42 amHouston media has just been celebrating over adding Durant for what they essentially deem "nothing," so there hasn't been a lot of discussion about Jalen Green. But here is a good article that focuses on Green, and the decision of either running it back with him or moving on:
https://www.chron.com/sports/rockets/ar ... 388585.phpFeel free to dismiss Green's often-disastrous two years under former coach Stephen Silas if you'd like. Year 2 for Green under current coach Ime Udoka wasn't significantly better than Year 1, with Green showing similar oscillation between strong performances and games of noticeable absence. Green excelled in December and January, then delivered a more average February and March. He shot an impressive 44.6 percent from the field and 37.1 percent from three during Houston wins. Those numbers dropped to 38.1 percent from the field and 32.3 percent from three in Houston losses. Green was among the 23 players to score 1,500 points last season. He finished No. 21 in field-goal percentage in that group, only making modest strides as a playmaker.
Maybe Green jumps to around 25 points per game in 2025-26, either alongside Phoenix star Devin Booker or a yet-to-be-revealed cast in another location. Ultimately, unless proven otherwise, I suspect Green's scoring ability is more akin to shooting guards described as fringe All-Stars rather than playoff-caliber leading men. Green's scoring thus far resembles a large bag of chips. Considerable in volume, but ultimately empty calories.
Green, despite the aforementioned warts, could still notch an All-Star appearance or two this decade, and he is athletic enough to potentially lead a multi-round playoff team if he refines his shot selection and three-point stroke.
I don't think putting him in a backcourt with another shooting guard does him any favors, but the x-factor is Jordan Ott. Does he turn Green into a player he's never been before? We'll see.Charlie Smithy! wrote: ↑Sat Jun 28, 2025 10:56 amDo you feel that there's any reason for us to hope that Jalen Green unlocks something / grows as a player while he's here.... perhaps enough to live up to his draft status?![]()
Not really. Green's performance in the playoffs did that. The overall narrative after the Rockets lost was: successful season, bright future, Amen Thompson is a revelation, Green probably isn't the guy to lead this team. Stone publicly lauded the virtues of continuity and keeping the team together. And apparently behind the scenes, it was Udoka who pushed for Durant.
We can agree to disagree. Green's performance has nothing to do with the media's job. Maybe he helped make it easier because of his uneven playoff performance, but I've seen it time and again, in all markets. Talk up how great the new guy is and downplay the outgoing one.INFORMER wrote: ↑Sat Jun 28, 2025 11:05 amNot really. Green's performance in the playoffs did that. The overall narrative after the Rockets lost was: successful season, bright future, Amen Thompson is a revelation, Green probably isn't the guy to lead this team. Stone publicly lauded the virtues of continuity and keeping the team together. And apparently behind the scenes, it was Udoka who pushed for Durant.
I do have hope here. It will be interesting to see for sure.INFORMER wrote: ↑Sat Jun 28, 2025 11:00 amI don't think putting him in a backcourt with another shooting guard does him any favors, but the x-factor is Jordan Ott. Does he turn Green into a player he's never been before? We'll see.Charlie Smithy! wrote: ↑Sat Jun 28, 2025 10:56 amDo you feel that there's any reason for us to hope that Jalen Green unlocks something / grows as a player while he's here.... perhaps enough to live up to his draft status?![]()
Hey, it was so fun last year...Split T wrote: ↑Sat Jun 28, 2025 11:48 amYou could’ve got Williams without trading KD, but no you wouldn’t have gotten Fleming or Maluach.
I’m not sure why you are certain Maluach won’t be useful for a few years. That seems like a guess.
But yes you could have run back the same team with Williams if you wanted. I don’t know what that does for us though. Yay we win 42 games!
Mori Chu wrote: ↑Sat Jun 28, 2025 11:29 amI really hated/hate the KD trade despite the nice moves and draft picks we have made since. So I just have to ask the question. Seems like most folks here are excited about the draft and trades we've made so far. Could we have essentially put this same team together without making the KD trade, minus Maluach of course? I know some of the 2nd round picks we made were done using 2nds we got by trading Durant. But could we maybe have traded another asset, like Grayson Allen or Royce O'Neale, for 2nds and made the same moves? I'm just asking. Couldn't we have run out the following lineup next year? Doesn't the following lineup (or something like this) look better than the (fun but likely very bad) team we now have?
C: Williams, Richards
PF: Durant, Oso, Fleming
SF: Dunn, O'Neale
SG: Booker, Beal, Brea
PG: Beal, Gillespie, free agent
To be clear, I didn't really want to keep Durant. But I don't really see how the assets we got for Durant are actually very helpful in the new team we've been assembling. Maluach is nice but I can kind of take or leave him as an asset, since he won't be ready for years. Brooks and Green are not players I really want to watch or have in my rotation. I think I would rather have the above team, warts and all, than what we have now. The above team is basically last year's team but with a hopefully much better coach, much better starting C, much better backup PF, and a young rookie SG who's a great shooter. And whatever other moves we would have been able to make, like signing a PG free agent. I wanted to trade Durant, but given the pitiful assets we got, I think I would rather have the above than what we got.