Re: 2018 Suns Offseason News
Posted: Wed May 30, 2018 8:01 am
Going forward, can we put a link in these posts to the article in question? Unless it's forbidden, it just makes it harder to find.
Going forward, can we put a link in these posts to the article in question? Unless it's forbidden, it just makes it harder to find.
It’s not forbidden, but when you’re telling people that a story is a non-story, linking to the non-story you want them to ignore might seem kinda pointless.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:01 amGoing forward, can we put a link in these posts to the article in question? Unless it's forbidden, it just makes it harder to find.
Cap wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:29 amIt’s not forbidden, but when you’re telling people that a story is a non-story, linking to the non-story you want them to ignore might seem kinda pointless.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:01 amGoing forward, can we put a link in these posts to the article in question? Unless it's forbidden, it just makes it harder to find.
If you don’t know what he’s talking about, you don’t really need to. It’s a non-story.
LOL. It is a chicken and egg issue, is it not? It forced me to google hoopshype and drive even more traffic to that silly "non-story".O_Gardino wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:34 amCap wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:29 amIt’s not forbidden, but when you’re telling people that a story is a non-story, linking to the non-story you want them to ignore might seem kinda pointless.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:01 amGoing forward, can we put a link in these posts to the article in question? Unless it's forbidden, it just makes it harder to find.
If you don’t know what he’s talking about, you don’t really need to. It’s a non-story.![]()
Before reading anything the page, I saw the gif and thought for sure the conversation was going to be about Bryan Colangelo. Dude has nice collars.O_Gardino wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:34 amCap wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:29 amIt’s not forbidden, but when you’re telling people that a story is a non-story, linking to the non-story you want them to ignore might seem kinda pointless.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:01 amGoing forward, can we put a link in these posts to the article in question? Unless it's forbidden, it just makes it harder to find.
If you don’t know what he’s talking about, you don’t really need to. It’s a non-story.![]()
They are normal collars. Now move along to the "Around the League" thread if you want to talk Tweetgate.jonh wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 9:13 amBefore reading anything the page, I saw the gif and thought for sure the conversation was going to be about Bryan Colangelo. Dude has nice collars.O_Gardino wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:34 amCap wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:29 amIt’s not forbidden, but when you’re telling people that a story is a non-story, linking to the non-story you want them to ignore might seem kinda pointless.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:01 amGoing forward, can we put a link in these posts to the article in question? Unless it's forbidden, it just makes it harder to find.
If you don’t know what he’s talking about, you don’t really need to. It’s a non-story.![]()
Interesting trade scenario. I'm not totally against JJJ, but not totally sold on him either. Let me see, the Suns trade Knight, #1, #16, #31, #59, Milwaukee's pick, Chriss, Big Sauce, Reed, Ulis and Dudley for Doncic, JJJ, one of these guards, JR Smith, Faried, and Parsons.INFORMER wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:47 pmMy dream scenario...
Trade #1:
Suns get: JR Smith, #3 pick, #8 pick
Hawks get: Brandon Knight, #1 pick, #31 pick, #59 pick
Cleveland gets: Dennis Schroeder, Marquese Chriss, #16 pick
Trade #2
Phoenix gets: Kenneth Faried, #14 pick
Denver gets: Alan Williams, Davon Reed, Tyler Ulis
Trade #3
Phoenix gets: #4 pick, Chandler Parsons
Memphis gets: #8 pick, Jared Dudley, JR Smith, Milwaukee pick
Draft Doncic at #3, Jaren Jackson Jr. at #4, and at #14 I would decide among Lonnie Walker Jr./Zhaire Smith/Aaron Holiday.
JR Smith would be in Memphis.
I think Sacramento will go with Bagley.
Yeah, my projected line-up would be a little different from In2's:
Sure, I definitely don't post enough news so I feel ya.AmareIsGod wrote: ↑Wed May 30, 2018 8:01 amGoing forward, can we put a link in these posts to the article in question? Unless it's forbidden, it just makes it harder to find.
RMLE is a contract created during the last CBA revision, looking to compesate teams under the cap for losing the MLE and biannual exceptions. You can use the RMLE contract after you spent your cap space, and said contract can have up to two years, starting at around $4.5M for 2018-19. Also, it can be broken down on more than one player.Split T wrote: ↑Thu May 31, 2018 12:44 pmQuestion about free agency. We will probably have around 11/12 million in cap space assuming we release cap holds on Len/Payton. In order to get up to the 18 million number that has been mentioned, we'd need to waive the non guaranteed contracts of Ulis/Williams/Reed. Williams is the one whose contract matters as he's set to make 5ish million dollars.
So my question, if we need to use the 18 million to sign a FA, can we waive Williams and sign him later using the room exception? Does anyone understand how the room exception works? I saw this link and it seems like we could essentially give Alan Williams a 2/10 contract which is essentially what he has right now anyways.
https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2017/08/how ... tions.html
Maybe I'm just greedy and reluctant to give up on players. But I really hope they don't just let all those guys go. Especially Williams and Ulis, I think they have talent and can play in our rotation.Split T wrote: ↑Thu May 31, 2018 12:44 pmQuestion about free agency. We will probably have around 11/12 million in cap space assuming we release cap holds on Len/Payton. In order to get up to the 18 million number that has been mentioned, we'd need to waive the non guaranteed contracts of Ulis/Williams/Reed. Williams is the one whose contract matters as he's set to make 5ish million dollars.
So my question, if we need to use the 18 million to sign a FA, can we waive Williams and sign him later using the room exception? Does anyone understand how the room exception works? I saw this link and it seems like we could essentially give Alan Williams a 2/10 contract which is essentially what he has right now anyways.
https://www.hoopsrumors.com/2017/08/how ... tions.html