Phx-Suns.Net

bajanguy008 wrote:Marc Stein‏Verified account @ESPNSteinLine 3m ago

Phoenix might be the only team holding a top-10 pick that could acquire Aldridge with confidence that it isn't just a one-year engagement.


NOOOOO !!

I really hope this is just a smoke screen to motivate Phil.

carey wrote:

Superbone wrote:https://twitter.com/Gambo987/status/877672587320373248

Just saw that. Very interesting.

Gross.

b, you're gonna give me a heart attack if you keep posting stuff like that.

OK, cap. Breathe. Count to ten. It's OK. We're not going to trade the #4 pick in this draft for LMA. The FO may be foolish and shortsighted, but they're not that bad.

bajanguy008 wrote:Marc Stein‏Verified account @ESPNSteinLine 3m ago

Phoenix might be the only team holding a top-10 pick that could acquire Aldridge with confidence that it isn't just a one-year engagement.


NOOOOO !!

Oh, man. Of course. We're going to lose the 4 pick for Aldridge.

Cap wrote:b, you're gonna give me a heart attack if you keep posting stuff like that.

OK, cap. Breathe. Count to ten. It's OK. We're not going to trade the #4 pick in this draft for LMA. The FO may be foolish and shortsighted, but they're not that bad.

Do you really believe that? They went after him hard a year ago.

ugh.

The fact that the Spurs are dumping him tells you all you need to know about Aldridge.

https://twitter.com/StevePopper/status/877935539500060672 Lol. Wtf?

Pretty sure I'll become a Sonics fan if we trade 4 for LMA.

Not worried about us chasing LMA with #4. Gambo said we already turned them down. If we also turned down Love for #4 who is younger and better than LMA we aren't taking LMA back.

carey wrote:Not worried about us chasing LMA with #4. Gambo said we already turned them down. If we also turned down Love for #4 who is younger and better than LMA we aren't taking LMA back.

Good point. Now all we have to worry about is Butler.

TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Pretty sure I'll become a Sonics fan if we trade 4 for LMA.

Superbone wrote:

Cap wrote:b, you're gonna give me a heart attack if you keep posting stuff like that.

OK, cap. Breathe. Count to ten. It's OK. We're not going to trade the #4 pick in this draft for LMA. The FO may be foolish and shortsighted, but they're not that bad.

Do you really believe that? They went after him hard a year ago.

That's the first thing I thought and the disappointment management felt having Spurs steal him last minute. Now I can see the quotes, "he may not have been the fit or had the year he wanted but he's still an all star talent and we believe........" smh
Oh and Sorry Cap , just doing my due diligence along with Carey keeping us all in the know

carey wrote:Not worried about us chasing LMA with #4. Gambo said we already turned them down. If we also turned down Love for #4 who is younger and better than LMA we aren't taking LMA back.

Oh, please be right!

EDC wrote:

carey wrote:Not worried about us chasing LMA with #4. Gambo said we already turned them down. If we also turned down Love for #4 who is younger and better than LMA we aren't taking LMA back.

Good point. Now all we have to worry about is Butler.

Ok kool

Superbone wrote:

Cap wrote:b, you're gonna give me a heart attack if you keep posting stuff like that.

OK, cap. Breathe. Count to ten. It's OK. We're not going to trade the #4 pick in this draft for LMA. The FO may be foolish and shortsighted, but they're not that bad.

Do you really believe that? They went after him hard a year ago.

I'm trying not to have a heart attack. Bone is trying to thwart my efforts.

Cap wrote:

Superbone wrote:

Cap wrote:b, you're gonna give me a heart attack if you keep posting stuff like that.

OK, cap. Breathe. Count to ten. It's OK. We're not going to trade the #4 pick in this draft for LMA. The FO may be foolish and shortsighted, but they're not that bad.

Do you really believe that? They went after him hard a year ago.

I'm trying not to have a heart attack. Bone is trying to thwart my efforts.

I'm sorry. I'm on edge as well. I think it's been debunked based on the latest tweets so I think we can relax a little.

https://mobile.twitter.com/ESPNSteinLine/status/877952093260140544

Anyone think of a deal that we could make that's better than Boston's without giving up Booker?

Of course the Celtics are the one team that has better assets than us and they'll get him. Of course.

Can someone lock Sarver in a storage closet or something until the draft is over? His input makes me so nervous.