Phx-Suns.Net

In2ition wrote: ↑

Wed Feb 02, 2022 8:37 pm

Perhaps that's the case, but I doubt it. If it's not approved by their clearly biased and compromised sources, it's automatically waved off as misinformation or a Russian planted story.

Case in point. I reported about Hunter's laptop, and all the shit that was on there. It's all true, but since it wasn't reported by the NYT, it was immediately debunked by Dems, Dem media, and Fact checkers(who are merely opinions, per Facebook court testimony), and even the New York Post twitter account was suspended over the story. Well, just because it's not blessed by the high priests of shit libs, doesn't make it untrue. Worshipping false gods, doesn't make them correct. Now, after more than a year, the NYT is starting to come around to admitting what was always true. That Hunter's laptop was real, and hellish. That they and many got manipulated by what their team wants you to know and think.

Same with Ashley's diary, as the FBI confirmed it to be real. Same with many, many stories I posted here. Eventually the truth comes out, and I'm not even asking for mea culpas.

If I thought that only what CNN, MSNBC, NYT, or the Washington Post, reported was true, I would have thought the Covington kid assaulted a Native American elder, or Jussie Smollett was a victim of a hate crime, or the Russians put bounties on the Americans heads in Afghanistan, or Trump cleared out Lafayette Park for a photo op in front of a church, or the Steele Dossier was real, or Epstein was just let off his charges the first time, because he was clearly innocent, or Kyle Rittenhouse took guns over state lines and killed 3 black men in premeditated murder, or I could go on and on.

3rdside wrote: ↑

Thu Feb 03, 2022 4:04 pm

In2ition wrote: ↑

Wed Feb 02, 2022 8:37 pm

Perhaps that's the case, but I doubt it. If it's not approved by their clearly biased and compromised sources, it's automatically waved off as misinformation or a Russian planted story.

Case in point. I reported about Hunter's laptop, and all the shit that was on there. It's all true, but since it wasn't reported by the NYT, it was immediately debunked by Dems, Dem media, and Fact checkers(who are merely opinions, per Facebook court testimony), and even the New York Post twitter account was suspended over the story. Well, just because it's not blessed by the high priests of shit libs, doesn't make it untrue. Worshipping false gods, doesn't make them correct. Now, after more than a year, the NYT is starting to come around to admitting what was always true. That Hunter's laptop was real, and hellish. That they and many got manipulated by what their team wants you to know and think.

Same with Ashley's diary, as the FBI confirmed it to be real. Same with many, many stories I posted here. Eventually the truth comes out, and I'm not even asking for mea culpas.

If I thought that only what CNN, MSNBC, NYT, or the Washington Post, reported was true, I would have thought the Covington kid assaulted a Native American elder, or Jussie Smollett was a victim of a hate crime, or the Russians put bounties on the Americans heads in Afghanistan, or Trump cleared out Lafayette Park for a photo op in front of a church, or the Steele Dossier was real, or Epstein was just let off his charges the first time, because he was clearly innocent, or Kyle Rittenhouse took guns over state lines and killed 3 black men in premeditated murder, or I could go on and on.

It's the alt-right playbook - if D's / MSM / liberals do 99 things right and one thing wrong, they're no different to alt-R's / alt-news / conservatives who do 99 things wrong but one thing right.

Balance of probabilities is your friend here, discretion likewise.

In2ition wrote:

3rdside wrote: ↑

Thu Feb 03, 2022 4:04 pm

In2ition wrote: ↑

Wed Feb 02, 2022 8:37 pm

Perhaps that's the case, but I doubt it. If it's not approved by their clearly biased and compromised sources, it's automatically waved off as misinformation or a Russian planted story.

Case in point. I reported about Hunter's laptop, and all the shit that was on there. It's all true, but since it wasn't reported by the NYT, it was immediately debunked by Dems, Dem media, and Fact checkers(who are merely opinions, per Facebook court testimony), and even the New York Post twitter account was suspended over the story. Well, just because it's not blessed by the high priests of shit libs, doesn't make it untrue. Worshipping false gods, doesn't make them correct. Now, after more than a year, the NYT is starting to come around to admitting what was always true. That Hunter's laptop was real, and hellish. That they and many got manipulated by what their team wants you to know and think.

Same with Ashley's diary, as the FBI confirmed it to be real. Same with many, many stories I posted here. Eventually the truth comes out, and I'm not even asking for mea culpas.

If I thought that only what CNN, MSNBC, NYT, or the Washington Post, reported was true, I would have thought the Covington kid assaulted a Native American elder, or Jussie Smollett was a victim of a hate crime, or the Russians put bounties on the Americans heads in Afghanistan, or Trump cleared out Lafayette Park for a photo op in front of a church, or the Steele Dossier was real, or Epstein was just let off his charges the first time, because he was clearly innocent, or Kyle Rittenhouse took guns over state lines and killed 3 black men in premeditated murder, or I could go on and on.

It's the alt-right playbook - if D's / MSM / liberals do 99 things right and one thing wrong, they're no different to alt-R's / alt-news / conservatives who do 99 things wrong but one thing right.

Balance of probabilities is your friend here, discretion likewise.

I don't know how to answer this nonsense.

In2ition wrote:

3rdside wrote: ↑

Thu Feb 03, 2022 4:04 pm

In2ition wrote: ↑

Wed Feb 02, 2022 8:37 pm

Perhaps that's the case, but I doubt it. If it's not approved by their clearly biased and compromised sources, it's automatically waved off as misinformation or a Russian planted story.

Case in point. I reported about Hunter's laptop, and all the shit that was on there. It's all true, but since it wasn't reported by the NYT, it was immediately debunked by Dems, Dem media, and Fact checkers(who are merely opinions, per Facebook court testimony), and even the New York Post twitter account was suspended over the story. Well, just because it's not blessed by the high priests of shit libs, doesn't make it untrue. Worshipping false gods, doesn't make them correct. Now, after more than a year, the NYT is starting to come around to admitting what was always true. That Hunter's laptop was real, and hellish. That they and many got manipulated by what their team wants you to know and think.

Same with Ashley's diary, as the FBI confirmed it to be real. Same with many, many stories I posted here. Eventually the truth comes out, and I'm not even asking for mea culpas.

If I thought that only what CNN, MSNBC, NYT, or the Washington Post, reported was true, I would have thought the Covington kid assaulted a Native American elder, or Jussie Smollett was a victim of a hate crime, or the Russians put bounties on the Americans heads in Afghanistan, or Trump cleared out Lafayette Park for a photo op in front of a church, or the Steele Dossier was real, or Epstein was just let off his charges the first time, because he was clearly innocent, or Kyle Rittenhouse took guns over state lines and killed 3 black men in premeditated murder, or I could go on and on.

It's the alt-right playbook - if D's / MSM / liberals do 99 things right and one thing wrong, they're no different to alt-R's / alt-news / conservatives who do 99 things wrong but one thing right.

Balance of probabilities is your friend here, discretion likewise.

I don't know how to answer this nonsense.

3rdside wrote: ↑

Fri Feb 04, 2022 2:29 pm

In2ition wrote:

3rdside wrote: ↑

Thu Feb 03, 2022 4:04 pm

In2ition wrote: ↑

Wed Feb 02, 2022 8:37 pm

Perhaps that's the case, but I doubt it. If it's not approved by their clearly biased and compromised sources, it's automatically waved off as misinformation or a Russian planted story.

Case in point. I reported about Hunter's laptop, and all the shit that was on there. It's all true, but since it wasn't reported by the NYT, it was immediately debunked by Dems, Dem media, and Fact checkers(who are merely opinions, per Facebook court testimony), and even the New York Post twitter account was suspended over the story. Well, just because it's not blessed by the high priests of shit libs, doesn't make it untrue. Worshipping false gods, doesn't make them correct. Now, after more than a year, the NYT is starting to come around to admitting what was always true. That Hunter's laptop was real, and hellish. That they and many got manipulated by what their team wants you to know and think.

Same with Ashley's diary, as the FBI confirmed it to be real. Same with many, many stories I posted here. Eventually the truth comes out, and I'm not even asking for mea culpas.

If I thought that only what CNN, MSNBC, NYT, or the Washington Post, reported was true, I would have thought the Covington kid assaulted a Native American elder, or Jussie Smollett was a victim of a hate crime, or the Russians put bounties on the Americans heads in Afghanistan, or Trump cleared out Lafayette Park for a photo op in front of a church, or the Steele Dossier was real, or Epstein was just let off his charges the first time, because he was clearly innocent, or Kyle Rittenhouse took guns over state lines and killed 3 black men in premeditated murder, or I could go on and on.

It's the alt-right playbook - if D's / MSM / liberals do 99 things right and one thing wrong, they're no different to alt-R's / alt-news / conservatives who do 99 things wrong but one thing right.

Balance of probabilities is your friend here, discretion likewise.

I don't know how to answer this nonsense.

Not that I feel too much urge to justify my position but when I talk about MSM above I mean Washington Post, NYT, The Times, The Telegraph, The Guardian, CNN international - these are the papers I read every day.

I also read Fox News every day and various niche sources whenever a decent article pops up e.g. The Atlantic, The New Yorker, The Economist as well as subscribe to sub stacks like John Hulsman,

Twitter commentary is also a good source of insight, reading lots of people from the centre ground as well as rabid lefty’s like Seth Abramson and rabid righty’s like Paul J Watson and Ben Shapiro. I’m a just right of centre centrist (https://www.politicalcompass.org/test) and don’t love any of those guys at the extremes but I still read them for balance.

These outlets and individuals (and not really including those mentioned Twitter accounts) have built up a reputation over time but, surprise surprise, they’re not infallible, which is why I read as much as I can to triangulate a view point.

In your support, you’re not wrong that MSNBC and CNN USA verge on being as bad as FOX news from time to time - I’m currently watching a few of Russell Brand’s YouTube video analysis on this (he’s kooky but does raise great points all the same).

Not in your support you seem unable to triangulate, instead continually reverting to proven-to-be-hair-brained sites that you somehow think are the real source of truth because they raised a valid point once, ignoring all the other mind numbing, dumb sh*t garbage they report over and over again.

This is the worst, and most blinkered, form of ignorance there is IMO, so well done for being that guy.