Not sure what you mean by "splashy".jkalldaway wrote:DSF is just trying to make a splashy statement. Nothing to see here.
Im simply pointing out that none of us know who's training staff is better than the others and the halo around the Suns training staff was concocted by the local media and exacerbated by pundits such as Bill Simmons who also dont know what theyre talking about.
Shabazz's post is a PERFECT example. He points out that Shaq played more games in his first full season in Phoenix than he did in the previous eight season in MIami in L.A. This is a spurious correlation, at best.
Its POSSIBLE this is due to the training staff, but probably not. It could be due to coaching, play style, environment (maybe Shaq didnt party as much in Phoenix as he did in LA and MIami), diet, or a million other behavioral factors combined. We dont know.
He then bottomed out after leaving Phoenix. Is this because of Cleveland's training staff, or did his 38 year old joints have trouble adjusting to playing in the freezing cold cities of Cleveland and Boston? Or the fact that he was simply too old? Or maybe he had just given up. We dont know.
There seems to be this belief that older players will do better here because of our training staff, but theres been plenty of players (who I pointed out earlier) that came here later in their careers and werent successful. And people also seem to forget that Shaq did have injuries here (back that he attributed to Lopez's shoving him in the back during practice). So did Nash (back issues...a lot). So did Grant HIll (hernia..missed all of the 2008 playoffs).
Show me a published report in a medical journal comparing/contrasting the different techniques used by different NBA teams and experts opinions as to who's doing the best. Even then, the conclusions would be based almost solely on opinion since theres no randomization or blocking of external factors.