I think he can pull up left but not right. That's not good enough.Split T wrote:He doesn't really have a pull up game right now. Kinda crucial for a pg in the nba
2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
That's why I think he would work out best with the Suns (or Boston). Playing next to Booker, he wouldn't have to be The Man in the halfcourt - he could play off the ball, spotting up and cutting.I know a lot of teams right now play through their guards letting the PG do everything, but that's not the only way to run the offense.Superbone wrote:I think he can pull up left but not right. That's not good enough.Split T wrote:He doesn't really have a pull up game right now. Kinda crucial for a pg in the nba
Hell, if we get Ball and keep Watson, you can look forward to seeing Ball spot up while Len posts up 14 feet from the basket.
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
Ball has value in the halfcourt because he'll find the open man. You just need set plays, motion, and cutting. He's not a true PnR guard the way Nash, Harden, Curry and most other guards have become. He can get into the lane, but I also wonder about his ability to finish at times against bigger players.
Online
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
I posted per 40 minute stats in the middle of the season, but here's how the top prospects ended up for the year:
Player Name Pts/Reb/Ast/Stl/Blk/FG%/3PT%/FT%
Markelle Fultz 26.0/6.4/6.6/1.7/1.3/.476/.413/.649
Lonzo Ball 16.6/6.8/8.7/2.1/0.9/.551/.412/.673
DeAaron Fox 22.6/5.3/6.2/2.0/0.3/.478/.246/.739
Dennis Smith 20.8/5.2/7.1/2.2/0.5/.455/.359/.715
Malik Monk 24.8/3.1/2.9/1.2/0.6/.450/.397/.833
Josh Jackson 21.2/9.6/3.9/2.2/1.4/.513/.378/.566
Jayson Tatum 20.2/8.8/2.6/1.6/1.4/.452/.348/.849
Jonathan Isaac 18.3/12.0/1.8/1.8/2.3/.508/.348/.780
Miles Bridges 21.1/10.4/2.6/0.8/1.9/.486/.389/.685
Lauri Markkanen 20.2/9.3/1.1/0.5/0.7/.492/.423/.835
Statistically, Bridges might deserve more consideration than he's been getting. He's right there with Jackson and Tatum, but often considered a late lotto pick.
Apologies if it's difficult to read, I tried to format it the best I could
Player Name Pts/Reb/Ast/Stl/Blk/FG%/3PT%/FT%
Markelle Fultz 26.0/6.4/6.6/1.7/1.3/.476/.413/.649
Lonzo Ball 16.6/6.8/8.7/2.1/0.9/.551/.412/.673
DeAaron Fox 22.6/5.3/6.2/2.0/0.3/.478/.246/.739
Dennis Smith 20.8/5.2/7.1/2.2/0.5/.455/.359/.715
Malik Monk 24.8/3.1/2.9/1.2/0.6/.450/.397/.833
Josh Jackson 21.2/9.6/3.9/2.2/1.4/.513/.378/.566
Jayson Tatum 20.2/8.8/2.6/1.6/1.4/.452/.348/.849
Jonathan Isaac 18.3/12.0/1.8/1.8/2.3/.508/.348/.780
Miles Bridges 21.1/10.4/2.6/0.8/1.9/.486/.389/.685
Lauri Markkanen 20.2/9.3/1.1/0.5/0.7/.492/.423/.835
Statistically, Bridges might deserve more consideration than he's been getting. He's right there with Jackson and Tatum, but often considered a late lotto pick.
Apologies if it's difficult to read, I tried to format it the best I could
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
I'm surprised that Fultz ft% was lower than Ball's.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."
Online
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
Ya, he didn't shoot well from the line. It's the only real weakness statistically for Fultz or Jackson.In2ition wrote:I'm surprised that Fultz ft% was lower than Ball's.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
According to SDC, he'll be a dud.Split T wrote:Ya, he didn't shoot well from the line. It's the only real weakness statistically for Fultz or Jackson.In2ition wrote:I'm surprised that Fultz ft% was lower than Ball's.
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Online
Free throw percentage can be an indicator of 3 pt ability, but in this case I'm not too worried. Fultz took a lot of difficult shots from 3 this year and still hit at a very good rate. If the sample size was smaller, I'd be a little worried that his 41% was a fluke, but the sample size is huge. The kid can shoot. Why his free throw percentage is so terrible is strange though.
Jackson on the other hand is more worrisome. He wasn't a good 3 pt shooter before college and he had a rough start to the season. He got hot the 2nd half(shooting like 45% from 3) to make his 3 pt numbers look pretty good. Is it legit? Or did he just have a hot streak? His very poor FT% would give some credence to the numbers being a little fluky
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
HaSuperbone wrote:According to SDC, he'll be a dud.Split T wrote:Ya, he didn't shoot well from the line. It's the only real weakness statistically for Fultz or Jackson.In2ition wrote:I'm surprised that Fultz ft% was lower than Ball's.
Free throw percentage can be an indicator of 3 pt ability, but in this case I'm not too worried. Fultz took a lot of difficult shots from 3 this year and still hit at a very good rate. If the sample size was smaller, I'd be a little worried that his 41% was a fluke, but the sample size is huge. The kid can shoot. Why his free throw percentage is so terrible is strange though.
Jackson on the other hand is more worrisome. He wasn't a good 3 pt shooter before college and he had a rough start to the season. He got hot the 2nd half(shooting like 45% from 3) to make his 3 pt numbers look pretty good. Is it legit? Or did he just have a hot streak? His very poor FT% would give some credence to the numbers being a little fluky
- specialsauce
- Posts: 8675
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
Would anyone trade Bledsoe, Warren + our pick to NO for Anthony Davis?
Online
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
I would do it in a heartbeat. Booker + Davis can be the two best pieces on a championship contender. The other pieces would be much easier to find.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
Of course. But the Pelicans wouldn't do it in a million years.specialsauce wrote:Would anyone trade Bledsoe, Warren + our pick to NO for Anthony Davis?
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
All I see with Bridges is Derrick Williams. Ugh.Split T wrote:I posted per 40 minute stats in the middle of the season, but here's how the top prospects ended up for the year:
Player Name Pts/Reb/Ast/Stl/Blk/FG%/3PT%/FT%
Markelle Fultz 26.0/6.4/6.6/1.7/1.3/.476/.413/.649
Lonzo Ball 16.6/6.8/8.7/2.1/0.9/.551/.412/.673
DeAaron Fox 22.6/5.3/6.2/2.0/0.3/.478/.246/.739
Dennis Smith 20.8/5.2/7.1/2.2/0.5/.455/.359/.715
Malik Monk 24.8/3.1/2.9/1.2/0.6/.450/.397/.833
Josh Jackson 21.2/9.6/3.9/2.2/1.4/.513/.378/.566
Jayson Tatum 20.2/8.8/2.6/1.6/1.4/.452/.348/.849
Jonathan Isaac 18.3/12.0/1.8/1.8/2.3/.508/.348/.780
Miles Bridges 21.1/10.4/2.6/0.8/1.9/.486/.389/.685
Lauri Markkanen 20.2/9.3/1.1/0.5/0.7/.492/.423/.835
Statistically, Bridges might deserve more consideration than he's been getting. He's right there with Jackson and Tatum, but often considered a late lotto pick.
Apologies if it's difficult to read, I tried to format it the best I could
Love, Hurts.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
Idk, I think Davis would be past his prime by then so... Maybe?Superbone wrote:Of course. But the Pelicans wouldn't do it in a million years.specialsauce wrote:Would anyone trade Bledsoe, Warren + our pick to NO for Anthony Davis?
Love, Hurts.
Online
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
Ive only watched him a little, but I'm not super high on him. Just pointing out that statistically he put up numbers. I think Jackson, Tatum, and Isaac are all better prospects.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:All I see with Bridges is Derrick Williams. Ugh.Split T wrote:I posted per 40 minute stats in the middle of the season, but here's how the top prospects ended up for the year:
Player Name Pts/Reb/Ast/Stl/Blk/FG%/3PT%/FT%
Markelle Fultz 26.0/6.4/6.6/1.7/1.3/.476/.413/.649
Lonzo Ball 16.6/6.8/8.7/2.1/0.9/.551/.412/.673
DeAaron Fox 22.6/5.3/6.2/2.0/0.3/.478/.246/.739
Dennis Smith 20.8/5.2/7.1/2.2/0.5/.455/.359/.715
Malik Monk 24.8/3.1/2.9/1.2/0.6/.450/.397/.833
Josh Jackson 21.2/9.6/3.9/2.2/1.4/.513/.378/.566
Jayson Tatum 20.2/8.8/2.6/1.6/1.4/.452/.348/.849
Jonathan Isaac 18.3/12.0/1.8/1.8/2.3/.508/.348/.780
Miles Bridges 21.1/10.4/2.6/0.8/1.9/.486/.389/.685
Lauri Markkanen 20.2/9.3/1.1/0.5/0.7/.492/.423/.835
Statistically, Bridges might deserve more consideration than he's been getting. He's right there with Jackson and Tatum, but often considered a late lotto pick.
Apologies if it's difficult to read, I tried to format it the best I could
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
8.5/10TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Idk, I think Davis would be past his prime by then so... Maybe?Superbone wrote:Of course. But the Pelicans wouldn't do it in a million years.specialsauce wrote:Would anyone trade Bledsoe, Warren + our pick to NO for Anthony Davis?

Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
Superbone wrote:8.5/10TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Idk, I think Davis would be past his prime by then so... Maybe?Superbone wrote:Of course. But the Pelicans wouldn't do it in a million years.specialsauce wrote:Would anyone trade Bledsoe, Warren + our pick to NO for Anthony Davis?

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
re Ball, I don't want my top 2 pick overall to have to function only to one side on offense, without being a suffocating defensive presence at the same time. I'm really hung up on that sidewinder. Sorry.
re Davis, I've grown less and less enamored with him. Maybe it's the injuries, maybe it's the terrible showing on the team's record (I know about the talent around him), maybe it's him not wanting to play C even though his natural position in today's NBA is 5. I just don't feel great that a team anchored by him has been this terrible for this long.
re Davis, I've grown less and less enamored with him. Maybe it's the injuries, maybe it's the terrible showing on the team's record (I know about the talent around him), maybe it's him not wanting to play C even though his natural position in today's NBA is 5. I just don't feel great that a team anchored by him has been this terrible for this long.
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
Ball will be fine. Davis's teams have been horribly built and misfit.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."
Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect & March Madness Discussion
Totally understand that about AD's teams. But he's not really a guy who makes the people around him better, which is what concerns me. He doesn't seem like the #1 star on a championship team, more of a #2 guy for me.