Page 5 of 7
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2024 8:07 pm
by Mori Chu
Oklahoma State senator calls LGBTQ people "filth" that he doesn't want in his state. What decade is it again?
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Fri Feb 23, 2024 9:40 pm
by TOO
Crazy how all these shit birds feel empowered to just slander whoever they want because it was ok for the great pumpkin to do it 4 years ago. Psychos.
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 7:16 am
by Mori Chu
Arkansas governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders passes anti-trans driver's license law.
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Wed Mar 13, 2024 8:54 am
by Cap
Mori Chu wrote: ↑Wed Mar 13, 2024 7:16 am
Arkansas governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders passes anti-trans driver's license law.
Making life more difficult for people they find distasteful
is a public policy goal on the right.
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 7:57 am
by In2ition
The NHS in the UK blocked puberty blockers from being prescribed this past week.
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:04 am
by Mori Chu
Is that the work of the Tories? They're the UK's GOP, sort of, right?
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 9:15 am
by In2ition
Is their NHS run by the Tories or is it supposed to be non-partisan? Honestly, I do not know answer to your question. They aren't the first country to make this decision though.
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 10:32 am
by Mori Chu
I do think it's weird to ban puberty blockers from being prescribed. Just let people do what they want to do and stay out of their lives. Isn't that a conservative point of view?
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 10:46 am
by In2ition
I am confused by your question, as it seems to skip a lot of other questions and assume a lot of other things first.
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 12:48 pm
by Mori Chu
Can you elaborate? What questions are skipped and what things are assumed?
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Thu Mar 14, 2024 3:06 pm
by In2ition
You are assuming that puberty blockers do not have long term negative effects to kids, and that kids could change their mind later without consequences, and maybe you should ask those questions first. You also assume that Republicans don't want government to protect minors, who can't consent to this, because for some reason you believe that they are 'government out of our lives' absolutists. I think that would be closer to a Libertarian POV.
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2024 1:50 pm
by Mori Chu
This guy can do whatever he wants in his personal life. Bird it's hypocritical of him to do this while also railing against LGBTQ rights in his work.
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2024 2:03 pm
by In2ition
Agreed. Has he changed his stance?
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2024 2:06 pm
by TOO
What email did he use when asking men for 1 on 2 sex?
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Fri Mar 15, 2024 2:17 pm
by In2ition
Are you trying to contact him?
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Fri Mar 22, 2024 5:31 pm
by Nodack
Not really LGBT but it’s own new classification. Of course this is the Daily mail which is mostly tabloid clickbait. Still interesting…
LGBTREE? 'Ecosexuality' is the latest sexual orientation that means people are 'turned on' by nature, including trees
The relationships aren't always sexual but one person described it as 'erotic'
Ecosexuality involves an erotic connection to nature, with the earth as a 'lover'
READ MORE: Canadian woman is in an 'erotic' relationship with an OAK TREE
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/arti ... trees.html
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Tue Apr 16, 2024 11:01 pm
by Mori Chu
A significant ruling for transgender people.
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2024 1:30 am
by Nodack
I don’t agree with that. Trans people are men that identify as women but, they are still men physically and them competing against women is completely unfair to the women they compete against. They should compete against the men or compete against other trans, not women.
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2024 8:03 am
by TOO
Nodack wrote: ↑Wed Apr 17, 2024 1:30 am
I don’t agree with that. Trans people are men that identify as women but, they are still men physically and them competing against women is completely unfair to the women they compete against. They should compete against the men or compete against other trans, not women.
This. It shouldn't even be a political issue, they have a literal physical advantage. Give them their own trans category.
Re: LGBTQ rights
Posted: Wed Apr 17, 2024 9:01 am
by In2ition
Looks like this too will go to the Supreme Court. It's going to be argued that it with a ban of trans women in sports, but not trans men, it's not anti-trans. It would just not allow biological man to compete in women's sports, but biological women can compete in men's sports if they desire to do so.