Page 5 of 6
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:44 pm
by TOO
That feeling when the Dubs announcers know more about how to play than your teams coach...
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:44 pm
by Shabazz
Why are we running Chandler post-ups in crunch time? WTF was that?
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:44 pm
by EDC
Really? Post play for Chandler?
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:45 pm
by Shabazz
Price in? Mirza at the 3? Good way to lose.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:46 pm
by EDC
Goodwin should have got more time. He was playing well.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:47 pm
by TOO
And we're back to being the Suns boys, it was a good run.. RIP the dream.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:49 pm
by Mori Chu
One of these teams knows how to finish a game. The other does not.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:49 pm
by EDC
Was a good game for the young guys and Knight increased his trade value. Win. Win.
It would have been nice though.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:50 pm
by EDC
We had an iso for Price followed by a post up for Chandler.

Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:54 pm
by Charlie Smithy!
Cap wrote:I fear all we have done is to awaken a sleeping giant and fill him with a terrible resolve.
Not even a Pyrrhic victory for us this time around.

Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:55 pm
by Charlie Smithy!
Mori Chu wrote:One of these teams knows how to finish a game. The other does not.
Yup.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:56 pm
by TOO
11 assists, 0 turnovers. I firmly believe Booker can be a PG, I dont care what anyone says.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 10:58 pm
by Charlie Smithy!
TheOriginalOriginal wrote:11 assists, 0 turnovers. I firmly believe Booker can be a PG, I dont care what anyone says.
But, consarn it, we needed Price in there! Lol.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 11:01 pm
by EDC
Some silly fouls from both Len and Booker early hurt us down the stretch. Ah well hopefully they learn from it.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 11:02 pm
by Charlie Smithy!
Was kinda nice to get so into a Suns game to the point of uttering obscenities...I'd almost forgotten what that was like!
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 11:03 pm
by Superbone
Well, Carey. At least you and I were way wrong. Curry played the entire fourth quarter and he needed to to secure the win.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 11:03 pm
by Cap
TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Curry gets 20 in the 4th, calling it now.
He actually got 15. Not bad.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 11:05 pm
by Charlie Smithy!
Superbone wrote:Well, Carey. At least you and I were way wrong. Curry played the entire fourth quarter and he needed to to secure the win.
I'll take that, for sure.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 11:12 pm
by Superbone
TheOriginalOriginal wrote:11 assists, 0 turnovers. I firmly believe Booker can be a PG, I dont care what anyone says.
He can be a PG in the same way Curry is. No question.
Re: Game Day: Suns (17-48) @ Warriors (58-6), Sat 3/12/16
Posted: Sat Mar 12, 2016 11:19 pm
by Shabazz
Superbone wrote:TheOriginalOriginal wrote:11 assists, 0 turnovers. I firmly believe Booker can be a PG, I dont care what anyone says.
He can be a PG in the same way Curry is. No question.
Ehh. I don't know if he can be a PG, but he can definitely be whatever you call guys like Harden and Brandon Roy.