A place for fans of the Phoenix Suns
https://www.phx-suns.net/
It really has been that long, though, hasn't it? Sometimes it seems like just a year or two ago. Other times, like a generation.EDC wrote:Damn. Didn't edit it in time. I realized it like 15 seconds after posting.Split T wrote:34 might be an oversight, two players did wear it after barkley though.EDC wrote:Not 34?
Must be an oversight on wikipedia.
Who wore #13?
EDC wrote:Damn. Didn't edit it in time. I realized it like 15 seconds after posting.Split T wrote:34 might be an oversight, two players did wear it after barkley though.EDC wrote:Not 34?
Must be an oversight on wikipedia.
If you want me to take it out, let me know. Trust me, I have made similar mistakes.EDC wrote:I've been exposed by INDY! :
I'm not sure. You could probably call it a gift, which isn't taxable under 13K.Indy wrote:Wouldn't it count as income, and then be taxed nationally and locally? In the end, what is 5k to a kid that just came into millions?Cap wrote:Should've taken the 10K. Duds can afford it.carey wrote:[youtube][/youtube]
Bender interview. Sounds like he just gave Dudley the number. He wanted 7 or 17 but couldn't have them.
You can't underestimate the Watson/Westbrook UCLA angle.Indy wrote:Now there are "rumors" saying Bledsoe, Bender, and 2017 1st for Westbrook, but not contingent on new deal...
Where is this?Indy wrote:Now there are "rumors" saying Bledsoe, Bender, and 2017 1st for Westbrook, but not contingent on new deal...
That's not an overpay by any means, but I just don't like the idea of trading for Westbrook. We don't have a team that's built to contend right now and I don't see any reason Westbrook would stay. I'd rather just let the young guys grow and try to build something for the future. No ones beating golden state over the next 4 years anyways.Indy wrote:Now there are "rumors" saying Bledsoe, Bender, and 2017 1st for Westbrook, but not contingent on new deal...
No. Nope. Uh uh.Indy wrote:Now there are "rumors" saying Bledsoe, Bender, and 2017 1st for Westbrook, but not contingent on new deal...
Rumors and speculations are now swirling around the Phoenix Suns who are reportedly trading Dragan Bender, Eric Bledsoe and 2017 first-round pick for Russell Westbrook of the Oklahoma City Thunder.
it's not terrible if you make them at a consistent rate.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Yup. The world loves Curry, who himself takes terrible shots and over dribbles all the time, but it's ok, because he's Steph. Westbrook is somehow made out to be this terrible teammate who only cares about himself, it's stupid.ShelC wrote:I think some are letting their personal feelings about Westbrook affect their evaluation of him. He's a monster and I'd take him everyday and put the right pieces around him.
i didnt say "win the title". i said make the playoffs. i'm willing to bet you OKC wont make the playoffs this year.Split T wrote:The thunder were incredibly close to winning the title this year. To say you can't build a title winning team around Westbrook is just false. Had Thompson not caught fire in game 6, I think the thunder win the title. I would have had them as favorites this year had Durant returned.
If the statement is Westbrook can't win a title as the only star, I guess that's true, but the same could be said about LeBron.
because he has the ball with him ALL THE TIME!Split T wrote:When players become stars we tend to focus on what they can't do as opposed to what they can do. Westbrook isn't perfect, he turns the ball over a lot and shoots way too many 3's, but he's impossible to guard in transition and driving to the hoop. He's not a pure point, but 10 assists a game can't be ignored. He's definitely in the mold of marbury or Steve Francis, but he's the Jordan of scoring point guards. Marbury is Jerry stackhouse.ShelC wrote:I think some are letting their personal feelings about Westbrook affect their evaluation of him. He's a monster and I'd take him everyday and put the right pieces around him.
