Last Week's Games
Tue, Jan 14th @ Hawks 117 - 122 Loss.
Thur, Jan 16th @ Wizards 130 - 123 Win!
Sat, Jan 18th @ Pistons 125 - 121 Win!
This Week's Games (All times MST)
Mon, Jan 20th @ Cavs 1:30 PM Suns Live, Arizona's Family 3TV / Arizona's Family Sports
Wed, Jan 22nd @ Nets 5:30 PM Suns Live, Arizona's Family 3TV / Arizona's Family Sports
Sat, Jan 25th vs. Wizards Suns Live, Arizona's Family 3TV / Arizona's Family Sports
I just saw this tweet. Not sure this would be a good move for us. Just because Nurk is dead salary doesn't mean you swap him for an even longer contract.
Re: Suns News: Week 14 (1/20 - 1/26)
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2025 11:44 am
by The Bobster
Pass.
Williams is a PF who can't score or rebound and has another 4 years/$72 million left on his contract.
Re: Suns News: Week 13 (1/20 - 1/26)
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2025 12:03 pm
by ShelC
I'd probably do that deal tbh. No picks involved, just a swap. PWill would give us the SF/PF with size we could use off the bench. It would help rebalance the roster too moving off a 4th center for perimeter depth without moving Allen. And I think you could still flip PWill down the road if need be.
I'd probably do that deal tbh. No picks involved, just a swap. PWill would give us the SF/PF with size we could use off the bench. It would help rebalance the roster too moving off a 4th center for perimeter depth without moving Allen. And I think you could still flip PWill down the road if need be.
Agreed.
Re: Suns News: Week 13 (1/20 - 1/26)
Posted: Mon Jan 20, 2025 1:26 pm
by Flagrant Fowl
He's not good, but he's better than emo Nurkic.
In typical Suns fashion, I'd rather have one of their other bigs -- Jalen Smith.
I think the "winner" of the Patrick Williams sweepstakes will be the 29 teams that aren't stuck with him.
He peaked his rookie season. I get that everyone is done with Nurk, but taking on Williams and his contract isn't an improvement. Sure, he brings some length and athleticism, can do some things on the defensive end, and can hit the occasional three. But he can't shoot consistently, he isn't productive, and he is a terrible rebounder. He just offers very little basketball value. Maybe there is hope that since he is only 23, he can still improve. But that doesn't justify $18 million a year for four more seasons.
I think the "winner" of the Patrick Williams sweepstakes will be the 29 teams that aren't stuck with him.
He peaked his rookie season. I get that everyone is done with Nurk, but taking on Williams and his contract isn't an improvement. Sure, he brings some length and athleticism, can do some things on the defensive end, and can hit the occasional three. But he can't shoot consistently, he isn't productive, and he is a terrible rebounder. He just offers very little basketball value. Maybe there is hope that since he is only 23, he can still improve. But that doesn't justify $18 million a year for four more seasons.
I think the "winner" of the Patrick Williams sweepstakes will be the 29 teams that aren't stuck with him.
He peaked his rookie season. I get that everyone is done with Nurk, but taking on Williams and his contract isn't an improvement. Sure, he brings some length and athleticism, can do some things on the defensive end, and can hit the occasional three. But he can't shoot consistently, he isn't productive, and he is a terrible rebounder. He just offers very little basketball value. Maybe there is hope that since he is only 23, he can still improve. But that doesn't justify $18 million a year for four more seasons.
I would rather just waive and stretch Nurkic.
Yeah.
I get the frustration, but stretching him seems excessive.
I think the "winner" of the Patrick Williams sweepstakes will be the 29 teams that aren't stuck with him.
He peaked his rookie season. I get that everyone is done with Nurk, but taking on Williams and his contract isn't an improvement. Sure, he brings some length and athleticism, can do some things on the defensive end, and can hit the occasional three. But he can't shoot consistently, he isn't productive, and he is a terrible rebounder. He just offers very little basketball value. Maybe there is hope that since he is only 23, he can still improve. But that doesn't justify $18 million a year for four more seasons.
I would rather just waive and stretch Nurkic.
Yeah.
I get the frustration, but stretching him seems excessive.
Well, maybe then he'd have a chance against Wemby.
Re: Suns News: Week 14 (1/20 - 1/26)
Posted: Tue Jan 21, 2025 9:05 am
by INFORMER
Solid analysis on what has happened to a once promising player. I think for any team hoping to salvage him, he should really be moved to being a big wing player instead of playing the 4. Also, I think he is mentally a lot like Joe Johnson was early in his career.
