Speaking of 360s, do you remember when Jason Kidd turned his career around 360° when he was traded here?Superbone wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 11:24 amA couple observations after watching the postgame interviews: Glad to see the locker room so somber after that loss. Much more appropriate response than what we would have seen last season. And secondly, Brooks is going to get fined for his ref comments.
How do you guys feel about that play when the dude did the 360? Should Suns have stopped play or did they do the right thing to quickly inbound the ball and try to take advantage of the mismatch. Is that going too far and is it unsportsmanlike? Either way, I think the Suns players were right in that the ref shouldn't have then just stopped the game on the other end of the court just because the opposing coach ran out onto the court.
Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
- Charlie Smithy!
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:01 pm
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
I think all the leagues have issues. NFL's officiating is right up there as well.Charlie Smithy! wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 1:18 pmShel (n anyone else), why does it always, to me, feel like it is always the NBA that has the most questionable and sometimes game-changing officiating?ShelC wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 11:53 amI thought it's always on the other team to foul to stop play. The Hawks could've fouled right on the inbounds. And if Snyder was on the court, that's a tech.
Reffing is an issue every single year. The refs let their own emotions take over and it affects the outcome of games.
Cuz in the other two sports that I follow (baseball and football), I just feel like the officiating/umpiring doesn't seem to quite have the same effect.
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
Brooks had some painful moments in the 4th as well. He's gotta chill with the 4th quarter Ts.
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
IMO basketball is much harder to officiate than those two sports. Those two have lots of natural stops in play; they spend more time "paused" than "live". Basketball is almost entirely live play, closer to soccer. So the refs don't get much time to catch up and assess the current just-completed play. More stuff is missed or has to be ignored.Charlie Smithy! wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 1:18 pmCuz in the other two sports that I follow (baseball and football), I just feel like the officiating/umpiring doesn't seem to quite have the same effect.
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
I'll also add that I think refs have so much more interaction with players that it will naturally affect how they call the games and certain players. There's much more of a human element involved in basketball with players and coaches lobbying and arguing their points, even talking (yelling) to refs while plays are live. Those things shouldn't affect how refs call the game but it does. Plus I think basketball refs are just as prone to fatigue and being irritable due to all the travel involved and x amount of games per week.
That's not to excuse the refs for being assholes or calling fouls or techs because they're pissed off or annoyed, just pointing out how different it is than something like football.
That's not to excuse the refs for being assholes or calling fouls or techs because they're pissed off or annoyed, just pointing out how different it is than something like football.
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
Enter Jamaree Bouyea, a 26 year old 6'2" PG. He has already played for 5 teams, but didn't get enough minutes to learn anything from the stats. He isn't the guard we want, but he is the guard that Ishbia deserves.Mori Chu wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 1:01 pmTo my eyes Dyson Daniels did a good job making things hard for Booker. Book still put up decent numbers, but it seemed like he had to really work to get it across the half-court line, and we often took too long to get into our offense. IMO that's the recipe for beating this Suns team: have a nasty swingman defender with long arms who can stifle Booker, and then just stay home on our 3-point shooters and dare a bunch of guys like Brooks to try to beat us 1-on-1.Superbone wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 11:00 amYep. Eddie Johnson said when Book came in with 10 minutes to play in the 4th that he was in to finish the Hawks off. Quite the opposite. He had a couple sloppy turnovers and totally changed the momentum in the wrong direction. What is it with him and barely getting it over the half court in time? Ott should have stuck with what got us there.
In games like this I think the need for other ballhandlers and initiators is especially prominent. Having Green would help a lot, or playing Gillespie more and running the offense through him rather than wearing out Booker playing "Point Book."
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
WutO_Gardino wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 2:14 pmEnter Jamaree Bouyea, a 26 year old 6'2" PG. He has already played for 5 teams, but didn't get enough minutes to learn anything from the stats. He isn't the guard we want, but he is the guard that Ishbia deserves.Mori Chu wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 1:01 pmTo my eyes Dyson Daniels did a good job making things hard for Booker. Book still put up decent numbers, but it seemed like he had to really work to get it across the half-court line, and we often took too long to get into our offense. IMO that's the recipe for beating this Suns team: have a nasty swingman defender with long arms who can stifle Booker, and then just stay home on our 3-point shooters and dare a bunch of guys like Brooks to try to beat us 1-on-1.Superbone wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 11:00 amYep. Eddie Johnson said when Book came in with 10 minutes to play in the 4th that he was in to finish the Hawks off. Quite the opposite. He had a couple sloppy turnovers and totally changed the momentum in the wrong direction. What is it with him and barely getting it over the half court in time? Ott should have stuck with what got us there.
In games like this I think the need for other ballhandlers and initiators is especially prominent. Having Green would help a lot, or playing Gillespie more and running the offense through him rather than wearing out Booker playing "Point Book."
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
Good point about initiators/bringing the ball up court. We have been doing it with others but why all of a sudden was it Book every time. I think we need to stick with the "others."Mori Chu wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 1:01 pmTo my eyes Dyson Daniels did a good job making things hard for Booker. Book still put up decent numbers, but it seemed like he had to really work to get it across the half-court line, and we often took too long to get into our offense. IMO that's the recipe for beating this Suns team: have a nasty swingman defender with long arms who can stifle Booker, and then just stay home on our 3-point shooters and dare a bunch of guys like Brooks to try to beat us 1-on-1.Superbone wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 11:00 amYep. Eddie Johnson said when Book came in with 10 minutes to play in the 4th that he was in to finish the Hawks off. Quite the opposite. He had a couple sloppy turnovers and totally changed the momentum in the wrong direction. What is it with him and barely getting it over the half court in time? Ott should have stuck with what got us there.
In games like this I think the need for other ballhandlers and initiators is especially prominent. Having Green would help a lot, or playing Gillespie more and running the offense through him rather than wearing out Booker playing "Point Book."
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
My feed froze right after this happened…did the refs just stop the play? There was no intentional foul?wpmiller42 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 9:26 amThat technical ended up having a huge impact on the game. The Hawks should have just intentionally fouled to stop the game.
I don’t have a problem with the refs stopping the play for an injury if they do it right away, but they let the suns come all the way down the court and start running a possession before anything happened…I don’t know exactly what you should do there and I’m curious what the rule book says. Rissacher was on the baseline and out of the play so I don’t really think there was a risk of further injury, but it was a dangerous enough fall that I think stopping the play immediately would have been the right move…just kinda tricky and unfortunate the refs let the play play out for so long…that alone should’ve given some leeway to the suns players, but then I’m not exactly sure what Brooks did to get a tech as my feed froze.
- wpmiller42
- Posts: 1085
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 10:22 pm
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
After the crazy fall, the Suns quickly inbounded and had a 5 on 4 break. I wouldn't have had a problem with the officials immediately stopping play after the fall, but they let the teams play on until Snyder ran onto the court. Book and Brooks contested that, and Brooks got T'd up over it.Split T wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 3:24 pmMy feed froze right after this happened…did the refs just stop the play? There was no intentional foul?wpmiller42 wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 9:26 amThat technical ended up having a huge impact on the game. The Hawks should have just intentionally fouled to stop the game.
I don’t have a problem with the refs stopping the play for an injury if they do it right away, but they let the suns come all the way down the court and start running a possession before anything happened…I don’t know exactly what you should do there and I’m curious what the rule book says. Rissacher was on the baseline and out of the play so I don’t really think there was a risk of further injury, but it was a dangerous enough fall that I think stopping the play immediately would have been the right move…just kinda tricky and unfortunate the refs let the play play out for so long…that alone should’ve given some leeway to the suns players, but then I’m not exactly sure what Brooks did to get a tech as my feed froze.
In my opinion, the Hawks should have fouled to stop play, especially since they were down like 20 anyways at that point. No excuses for us, we should have won, but I did think we lost focus and it seemed to refocus them after the play.
- specialsauce
- Posts: 9000
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
And 125 would've won it.
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
Giving up 47 in a quarter seems like the issue to me. *shrugs*
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
Both things can be true. We gave up 47 points in the 4th and also our offense failed to score on at least 8 or 9 straight possessions…we lost because both the offense and defense disappeared at the end.
- Charlie Smithy!
- Posts: 1754
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:01 pm
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
You...shruggedTOO wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 8:29 pmGiving up 47 in a quarter seems like the issue to me. *shrugs*
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
Atlas shrugged.Charlie Smithy! wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 10:02 pmYou...shruggedTOO wrote: ↑Mon Nov 17, 2025 8:29 pmGiving up 47 in a quarter seems like the issue to me. *shrugs*![]()
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
Bears mentioning that we are missing two starters. Grayson Allen and Jalen Green are both capable scorers who would have brought a lot to that game the other night. I bet we win it if either one of them plays. Atlanta was missing Trae Young, but there's some heavy Ewing Theory energy going on over there right now, so I'm not sure they are actually any worse without him.
Re: Game Day: Hawks (8-5) @ Suns (8-5), Sun 11/16/25
That's fine but it's next man up. No excuses. It will be rare times when we are fully healthy.Mori Chu wrote: ↑Tue Nov 18, 2025 1:07 amBears mentioning that we are missing two starters. Grayson Allen and Jalen Green are both capable scorers who would have brought a lot to that game the other night. I bet we win it if either one of them plays. Atlanta was missing Trae Young, but there's some heavy Ewing Theory energy going on over there right now, so I'm not sure they are actually any worse without him.
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.