According to McDonough, it's never happened before.Cap wrote:It's about a 1.87% chance, or about 1-in-53.Superbone wrote:Gotta be the first time nothing changed.Cap wrote:Not even any rearrangements in the Top 3. I wonder, what are the odds of the lottery holding exactly true to form?
DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
Online
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Bender's name has been out there a while and I feel like he's a bit more known than Porzingis was at this time last year. What's funny is that he's regarded as raw and a project, which is exactly what they were saying about Porzingis when he was drafted - the old "He won't contribute for 2-3 years" stuff. My fear is that he'll get taken high because of the Porzingis "hype" and won't be as good or will be legit be a 2-3 year project.
I have my own thoughts and philosophy for the team but I would entertain trading the 4th pick and/or the 13th picks.
I have my own thoughts and philosophy for the team but I would entertain trading the 4th pick and/or the 13th picks.
- Sunsfan4life
- Posts: 3029
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 11:16 pm
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Best case scenario is The Lakers don't want Ingram and Simmons, after the inevitable bitching and moaning Rich Paul will do to get hi to LA, will be taken by the Sixers. Then the Lakers, wanting to compete as quick as possible under the ridiculous ultimatum Jeanie Buss gave jim about him having to make the playoffs or get fired, agree to a swap of picks with Phoenix in exchange for Knight or Bledsoe. It's far fetched but....you never know.
If we stick at 4 I would have to look more into Bender. I'll fully admit he is the prospect I know the least about, But I'm not enamored with anyone else. I think Dunn or Hield may be my next chioces but I understand the heisitation for a guy like Dunn. He is very comparable to Bledsoe. I actually think he'd fit well in Philly (Okafor to the Celtics for #3? Don't sleep on it). So He's a good player, but he is a hybrid guard. I refuse to take or not take a player on how our roster is "constructed" because I think Knight or Bledsoe will be moved out by next off-season at the latest. Or atleast should be...
Damn...I really really wanted a top 2 pick. The difference between 3-12 is negligible IMO.
If we stick at 4 I would have to look more into Bender. I'll fully admit he is the prospect I know the least about, But I'm not enamored with anyone else. I think Dunn or Hield may be my next chioces but I understand the heisitation for a guy like Dunn. He is very comparable to Bledsoe. I actually think he'd fit well in Philly (Okafor to the Celtics for #3? Don't sleep on it). So He's a good player, but he is a hybrid guard. I refuse to take or not take a player on how our roster is "constructed" because I think Knight or Bledsoe will be moved out by next off-season at the latest. Or atleast should be...
Damn...I really really wanted a top 2 pick. The difference between 3-12 is negligible IMO.
“Kobe had said (after the play) I wasn’t hugged enough as a child,” Bell recalled. “My mom kind of found him after the instance and we had beat them and offered him a hug in the bowels of the Phoenix arena. She really feels a part of that story.”
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
The only difference between 4 and even, say, 13 is that you get to choose first. Talent wise I think it's a pretty deep tier 2 that is actually a tier 3 in most drafts.
Go Suns!
Og Snus!
Og Snus!
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Are they even a reputable sports news source anymore for the Suns?
This is pure spin... and made me want to never read anything from Cluff again.
https://twitter.com/azcsports/status/732956477690896385
This is pure spin... and made me want to never read anything from Cluff again.
https://twitter.com/azcsports/status/732956477690896385
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
I've never heard of Cluff before but that can be considered a fluff piece or more literally, a Cluff piece.
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Listening to Doug and Wolf right now, If G is bpa at 4, do you take him? McD, YES. Blah.
- Sunsfan4life
- Posts: 3029
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 11:16 pm
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
I actually like that. You take BPA when you're a team that isn't close to contending. The only exception...Maybe....is if you have a back to the basket guy young stud and the BPA is the same. Anyways, The lottery has a ton of question marks. The Simmions v Sixers drama will be pretty interesting to see lay out. Simmions has zero leverage though, I'm sure Rich Paul won't care. The Celtics absolutely may trade that 3rd pick. I'm seeing Jamaal Murray or Bender to them in almost every mock.
The Wolves are in an interesting position. Can a Rubio/Dunn Backcourt work? Where would that leave Lavine? Does Thibs even like Rubio? So many question marks. Alot of the teams up at the top of the lottery have completely lopsided rosters. Starting with Forward/Center heavy Philly and including us.
The Wolves are in an interesting position. Can a Rubio/Dunn Backcourt work? Where would that leave Lavine? Does Thibs even like Rubio? So many question marks. Alot of the teams up at the top of the lottery have completely lopsided rosters. Starting with Forward/Center heavy Philly and including us.
“Kobe had said (after the play) I wasn’t hugged enough as a child,” Bell recalled. “My mom kind of found him after the instance and we had beat them and offered him a hug in the bowels of the Phoenix arena. She really feels a part of that story.”
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
I think Thibs will love Rubio. He plays hard defensively and doesnt force it offensively. He's the exact opposite of what Rose was.
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
I like the highlights I have seen of Bender. Not sure if he will click well with our backcourt of Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum, but I don't think much about those guys when I think about our team's future anyway.
I do like taking BPA, but we have such a weirdly crowded backcourt that I honestly think we would just ruin any PG we would draft this year. I don't want a PG and probably not even an SG. What would we do with both Booker and hypothetical-SG-rookie on our team? The guy won't get any minutes, he won't develop, and we'll have to trade him or let him go in 3 years. He might become great, but not for our team. What's the point of taking a guy like that? Draft a darn forward.
I do like taking BPA, but we have such a weirdly crowded backcourt that I honestly think we would just ruin any PG we would draft this year. I don't want a PG and probably not even an SG. What would we do with both Booker and hypothetical-SG-rookie on our team? The guy won't get any minutes, he won't develop, and we'll have to trade him or let him go in 3 years. He might become great, but not for our team. What's the point of taking a guy like that? Draft a darn forward.
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
The upside of Murray and Buddy would be giving the backcourt more shooting and more BBIQ. Something it needs to go with Booker and the dummies. If we can off-load one of the dummies, I'd have no problem drafting a G. They both also have an alpha personality, and we could use another one of those IMO.
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Mutombo interviewed about his ominous early tweet that the Sixers had won the lottery:
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/75720a06 ... er-mistake
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/75720a06 ... er-mistake
Online
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
He was probably tweeting from Africa, which is 5 hours ahead. So of course he knew the results ahead of time.
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
*slow clap*ShelC wrote:He was probably tweeting from Africa, which is 5 hours ahead. So of course he knew the results ahead of time.
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Don't forget about Bogdanovic.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:I like the highlights I have seen of Bender. Not sure if he will click well with our backcourt of Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum, but I don't think much about those guys when I think about our team's future anyway.
I do like taking BPA, but we have such a weirdly crowded backcourt that I honestly think we would just ruin any PG we would draft this year. I don't want a PG and probably not even an SG. What would we do with both Booker and hypothetical-SG-rookie on our team? The guy won't get any minutes, he won't develop, and we'll have to trade him or let him go in 3 years. He might become great, but not for our team. What's the point of taking a guy like that? Draft a darn forward.
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
I have a feeling that Bogdanovic may not come over this year.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Agreed. I think it was carey that pointed out he would have to play for basically the league minimum, but could negotiate his own contract if he waits another year.In2ition wrote:I have a feeling that Bogdanovic may not come over this year.
- Sunsfan4life
- Posts: 3029
- Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 11:16 pm
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
I was banking on him for staying another season over in Europe.
“Kobe had said (after the play) I wasn’t hugged enough as a child,” Bell recalled. “My mom kind of found him after the instance and we had beat them and offered him a hug in the bowels of the Phoenix arena. She really feels a part of that story.”
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Wrong thread, but should I get this?


Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Been talking to Kings fans elsewhere... #13 + Knight + Tucker for Gay + #8? Take the guard at 4; grab Ellenson at 8.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Listening to Doug and Wolf right now, If G is bpa at 4, do you take him? McD, YES. Blah.