DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Discussion of the league and of our favorite team.
User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by Indy »

Superbone wrote:
Hermen wrote:I would add that he was also coming from a career year and was in his contract year, so it's not hard to see why he was pissed. In the end I think that mess worked out well for both sides.
As for rookies I don't think it's a problem they express their wishes. It's up to the teams to be a desirable workplace.
Except the part that's not deirable is the number of guards and point guards. Doesn't mean that can't change before or after the draft.
I think you are assuming what is undesirable for him.

User avatar
Superbone
Posts: 39598
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:44 am
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Mood:

Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by Superbone »

Indy wrote:
Superbone wrote:
Hermen wrote:I would add that he was also coming from a career year and was in his contract year, so it's not hard to see why he was pissed. In the end I think that mess worked out well for both sides.
As for rookies I don't think it's a problem they express their wishes. It's up to the teams to be a desirable workplace.
Except the part that's not desirable is the number of guards and point guards. Doesn't mean that can't change before or after the draft.
I think you are assuming what is undesirable for him.
Nope. I'm repeating the reasons that came from his camp from what I've read and heard.
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by Indy »

Superbone wrote:
Indy wrote:
Superbone wrote:
Hermen wrote:I would add that he was also coming from a career year and was in his contract year, so it's not hard to see why he was pissed. In the end I think that mess worked out well for both sides.
As for rookies I don't think it's a problem they express their wishes. It's up to the teams to be a desirable workplace.
Except the part that's not desirable is the number of guards and point guards. Doesn't mean that can't change before or after the draft.
I think you are assuming what is undesirable for him.
Nope. I'm repeating the reasons that came from his camp from what I've read and heard.
Got it. Been busy today and only saw the blurb stating he didn't want to be here.

EDC
Posts: 3242
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:56 pm

Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by EDC »

The part I don't like about the Dunn situation is the fact that he is only going to let certain teams give him a physical. He skipped the physical at the combine.

I don't think you can force a player to give a physical before the draft but I do believe that if he does one for a team all teams should have access to that information.

User avatar
Hermen
Posts: 894
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 3:35 pm

Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by Hermen »

Superbone wrote:
Hermen wrote:I would add that he was also coming from a career year and was in his contract year, so it's not hard to see why he was pissed. In the end I think that mess worked out well for both sides.
As for rookies I don't think it's a problem they express their wishes. It's up to the teams to be a desirable workplace.
Except the part that's not desirable is the number of guards and point guards. Doesn't mean that can't change before or after the draft.
I don't think that is an invalid reason to not want to go to a team. Also if he said this is the reason then there should be no worries for the Suns to draft him if they intend to lower the number of guards in the offseason.

This on the other hand I really dislike: https://twitter.com/RyanKelapire/status/733062424429879296 Edit: That would mean I agree with EDC :)

User avatar
carey
Posts: 12214
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by carey »

EDC wrote:The part I don't like about the Dunn situation is the fact that he is only going to let certain teams give him a physical. He skipped the physical at the combine.

I don't think you can force a player to give a physical before the draft but I do believe that if he does one for a team all teams should have access to that information.
Why? That violates HIPAA. I think players should be in control of who sees what. However, deciding not to show all your prospective employers your history does come off a bit funny. Like he is trying to game the system. I generally don't mind when players try to "take back the power" or control their own destiny, it just stinks when your team is the one they don't want to be on.

Not that I want Dunn anyway. I think he is an average NBA PG prospect.
Go Suns!

Og Snus!

User avatar
Mori Chu
Posts: 25473
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:05 am
Mood:

Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by Mori Chu »

NBA should confiscate his rookie salary if he wants to do that kind of stuff.

User avatar
carey
Posts: 12214
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by carey »

Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:NBA should confiscate his rookie salary if he wants to do that kind of stuff.
Lol!
Go Suns!

Og Snus!

User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 13187
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by In2ition »

Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:NBA should confiscate his rookie salary if he wants to do that kind of stuff.
Well, he is sacrificing at least a cool million if we was to be picked by Boston or Phx over someone lower. I guess the money isn't quite that important to him.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."

User avatar
Shabazz
Posts: 7645
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:16 pm

Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by Shabazz »

No reason to be offended that he doesn't want to come here. It's for basketball reasons, not organizational ones. He'd ride the pine here.

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by Indy »

carey wrote:
EDC wrote:The part I don't like about the Dunn situation is the fact that he is only going to let certain teams give him a physical. He skipped the physical at the combine.

I don't think you can force a player to give a physical before the draft but I do believe that if he does one for a team all teams should have access to that information.
Why? That violates HIPAA. I think players should be in control of who sees what. However, deciding not to show all your prospective employers your history does come off a bit funny. Like he is trying to game the system. I generally don't mind when players try to "take back the power" or control their own destiny, it just stinks when your team is the one they don't want to be on.

Not that I want Dunn anyway. I think he is an average NBA PG prospect.
I think when you choose to work for a government sanctioned monopoly like the NBA, you lose a lot of liberties. I think HIPAA should be one of those, if your entire career is based on your body (I know it is not everything, but you get my drift). I think when you sign your paperwork to enter the draft, it should include statements that require you to be made available for interviews/physicals for every team (or a joint interview/common physical).

User avatar
carey
Posts: 12214
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by carey »

Indy wrote: I think when you choose to work for a government sanctioned monopoly like the NBA, you lose a lot of liberties. I think HIPAA should be one of those, if your entire career is based on your body (I know it is not everything, but you get my drift). I think when you sign your paperwork to enter the draft, it should include statements that require you to be made available for interviews/physicals for every team (or a joint interview/common physical).
That is a fair & reasoned take. I just disagree but I disagree with many of the "rules" in the Collective Bargaining Agreement so not much of a surprise there. I've often wondered what the NBA would look like without one. Stars going wherever they want for as much as they want. Would the natural order of things balance out the super teams? Would the Lakers and Knicks buy championships every year? What if there were no draft? It's interesting to think about.
Go Suns!

Og Snus!

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by Indy »

carey wrote:
Indy wrote: I think when you choose to work for a government sanctioned monopoly like the NBA, you lose a lot of liberties. I think HIPAA should be one of those, if your entire career is based on your body (I know it is not everything, but you get my drift). I think when you sign your paperwork to enter the draft, it should include statements that require you to be made available for interviews/physicals for every team (or a joint interview/common physical).
That is a fair & reasoned take. I just disagree but I disagree with many of the "rules" in the Collective Bargaining Agreement so not much of a surprise there. I've often wondered what the NBA would look like without one. Stars going wherever they want for as much as they want. Would the natural order of things balance out the super teams? Would the Lakers and Knicks buy championships every year? What if there were no draft? It's interesting to think about.
It is interesting. I would think they would need to "disband" the NBA, and make every team be their own company. We would probably end up with 8-10 teams after a few years, though.

User avatar
JCSunsfan
Posts: 2136
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 11:22 am

Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by JCSunsfan »

Indy wrote:
carey wrote:
EDC wrote:The part I don't like about the Dunn situation is the fact that he is only going to let certain teams give him a physical. He skipped the physical at the combine.

I don't think you can force a player to give a physical before the draft but I do believe that if he does one for a team all teams should have access to that information.
Why? That violates HIPAA. I think players should be in control of who sees what. However, deciding not to show all your prospective employers your history does come off a bit funny. Like he is trying to game the system. I generally don't mind when players try to "take back the power" or control their own destiny, it just stinks when your team is the one they don't want to be on.

Not that I want Dunn anyway. I think he is an average NBA PG prospect.
I think when you choose to work for a government sanctioned monopoly like the NBA, you lose a lot of liberties. I think HIPAA should be one of those, if your entire career is based on your body (I know it is not everything, but you get my drift). I think when you sign your paperwork to enter the draft, it should include statements that require you to be made available for interviews/physicals for every team (or a joint interview/common physical).
Totally agree. Probably will happen in the next CBA.

User avatar
JCSunsfan
Posts: 2136
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 11:22 am

Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by JCSunsfan »

Indy wrote:
carey wrote:
Indy wrote: I think when you choose to work for a government sanctioned monopoly like the NBA, you lose a lot of liberties. I think HIPAA should be one of those, if your entire career is based on your body (I know it is not everything, but you get my drift). I think when you sign your paperwork to enter the draft, it should include statements that require you to be made available for interviews/physicals for every team (or a joint interview/common physical).
That is a fair & reasoned take. I just disagree but I disagree with many of the "rules" in the Collective Bargaining Agreement so not much of a surprise there. I've often wondered what the NBA would look like without one. Stars going wherever they want for as much as they want. Would the natural order of things balance out the super teams? Would the Lakers and Knicks buy championships every year? What if there were no draft? It's interesting to think about.
It is interesting. I would think they would need to "disband" the NBA, and make every team be their own company. We would probably end up with 8-10 teams after a few years, though.
And little fan interest. I would have no interest in watching that type of league.

User avatar
Superbone
Posts: 39598
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:44 am
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Mood:

Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by Superbone »

Yup, and ruin decades and decades of history and common stats. No thanks!
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.

User avatar
Mori Chu
Posts: 25473
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:05 am
Mood:

Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by Mori Chu »

Indy wrote:I think when you choose to work for a government sanctioned monopoly like the NBA, you lose a lot of liberties. I think HIPAA should be one of those, if your entire career is based on your body (I know it is not everything, but you get my drift). I think when you sign your paperwork to enter the draft, it should include statements that require you to be made available for interviews/physicals for every team (or a joint interview/common physical).
YES.

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by Indy »

Superbone wrote:Yup, and ruin decades and decades of history and common stats. No thanks!
Aren't stats meaningless anyway? Baseball keeps clinging to their "history" and "stats" and all it has done is kill the game.

User avatar
Aztec Sunsfan
Posts: 1883
Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 9:56 pm

Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by Aztec Sunsfan »

It goes both ways, the players have guaranteed salaries and rookie scales, that certainly hurt the stars, but protects most of the middle class, much better than the other leagues.

User avatar
Charlie Smithy!
Posts: 1746
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:01 pm

Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016

Post by Charlie Smithy! »

Indy wrote:
Superbone wrote:Yup, and ruin decades and decades of history and common stats. No thanks!
Aren't stats meaningless anyway? Baseball keeps clinging to their "history" and "stats" and all it has done is kill the game.
<threadhijack>Okay, Indy, you gotta explain your perspective on this one to me - as I'm a baseball lifer who has always been knee-deep in the history and stats. :mrgreen: </threadhijack

Post Reply