I think you are assuming what is undesirable for him.Superbone wrote:Except the part that's not deirable is the number of guards and point guards. Doesn't mean that can't change before or after the draft.Hermen wrote:I would add that he was also coming from a career year and was in his contract year, so it's not hard to see why he was pissed. In the end I think that mess worked out well for both sides.
As for rookies I don't think it's a problem they express their wishes. It's up to the teams to be a desirable workplace.
DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Nope. I'm repeating the reasons that came from his camp from what I've read and heard.Indy wrote:I think you are assuming what is undesirable for him.Superbone wrote:Except the part that's not desirable is the number of guards and point guards. Doesn't mean that can't change before or after the draft.Hermen wrote:I would add that he was also coming from a career year and was in his contract year, so it's not hard to see why he was pissed. In the end I think that mess worked out well for both sides.
As for rookies I don't think it's a problem they express their wishes. It's up to the teams to be a desirable workplace.
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Got it. Been busy today and only saw the blurb stating he didn't want to be here.Superbone wrote:Nope. I'm repeating the reasons that came from his camp from what I've read and heard.Indy wrote:I think you are assuming what is undesirable for him.Superbone wrote:Except the part that's not desirable is the number of guards and point guards. Doesn't mean that can't change before or after the draft.Hermen wrote:I would add that he was also coming from a career year and was in his contract year, so it's not hard to see why he was pissed. In the end I think that mess worked out well for both sides.
As for rookies I don't think it's a problem they express their wishes. It's up to the teams to be a desirable workplace.
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
The part I don't like about the Dunn situation is the fact that he is only going to let certain teams give him a physical. He skipped the physical at the combine.
I don't think you can force a player to give a physical before the draft but I do believe that if he does one for a team all teams should have access to that information.
I don't think you can force a player to give a physical before the draft but I do believe that if he does one for a team all teams should have access to that information.
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
I don't think that is an invalid reason to not want to go to a team. Also if he said this is the reason then there should be no worries for the Suns to draft him if they intend to lower the number of guards in the offseason.Superbone wrote:Except the part that's not desirable is the number of guards and point guards. Doesn't mean that can't change before or after the draft.Hermen wrote:I would add that he was also coming from a career year and was in his contract year, so it's not hard to see why he was pissed. In the end I think that mess worked out well for both sides.
As for rookies I don't think it's a problem they express their wishes. It's up to the teams to be a desirable workplace.
This on the other hand I really dislike: https://twitter.com/RyanKelapire/status/733062424429879296 Edit: That would mean I agree with EDC

Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Why? That violates HIPAA. I think players should be in control of who sees what. However, deciding not to show all your prospective employers your history does come off a bit funny. Like he is trying to game the system. I generally don't mind when players try to "take back the power" or control their own destiny, it just stinks when your team is the one they don't want to be on.EDC wrote:The part I don't like about the Dunn situation is the fact that he is only going to let certain teams give him a physical. He skipped the physical at the combine.
I don't think you can force a player to give a physical before the draft but I do believe that if he does one for a team all teams should have access to that information.
Not that I want Dunn anyway. I think he is an average NBA PG prospect.
Go Suns!
Og Snus!
Og Snus!
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
NBA should confiscate his rookie salary if he wants to do that kind of stuff.
Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Lol!Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:NBA should confiscate his rookie salary if he wants to do that kind of stuff.
Go Suns!
Og Snus!
Og Snus!
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Well, he is sacrificing at least a cool million if we was to be picked by Boston or Phx over someone lower. I guess the money isn't quite that important to him.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:NBA should confiscate his rookie salary if he wants to do that kind of stuff.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
No reason to be offended that he doesn't want to come here. It's for basketball reasons, not organizational ones. He'd ride the pine here.
Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
I think when you choose to work for a government sanctioned monopoly like the NBA, you lose a lot of liberties. I think HIPAA should be one of those, if your entire career is based on your body (I know it is not everything, but you get my drift). I think when you sign your paperwork to enter the draft, it should include statements that require you to be made available for interviews/physicals for every team (or a joint interview/common physical).carey wrote:Why? That violates HIPAA. I think players should be in control of who sees what. However, deciding not to show all your prospective employers your history does come off a bit funny. Like he is trying to game the system. I generally don't mind when players try to "take back the power" or control their own destiny, it just stinks when your team is the one they don't want to be on.EDC wrote:The part I don't like about the Dunn situation is the fact that he is only going to let certain teams give him a physical. He skipped the physical at the combine.
I don't think you can force a player to give a physical before the draft but I do believe that if he does one for a team all teams should have access to that information.
Not that I want Dunn anyway. I think he is an average NBA PG prospect.
Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
That is a fair & reasoned take. I just disagree but I disagree with many of the "rules" in the Collective Bargaining Agreement so not much of a surprise there. I've often wondered what the NBA would look like without one. Stars going wherever they want for as much as they want. Would the natural order of things balance out the super teams? Would the Lakers and Knicks buy championships every year? What if there were no draft? It's interesting to think about.Indy wrote: I think when you choose to work for a government sanctioned monopoly like the NBA, you lose a lot of liberties. I think HIPAA should be one of those, if your entire career is based on your body (I know it is not everything, but you get my drift). I think when you sign your paperwork to enter the draft, it should include statements that require you to be made available for interviews/physicals for every team (or a joint interview/common physical).
Go Suns!
Og Snus!
Og Snus!
Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
It is interesting. I would think they would need to "disband" the NBA, and make every team be their own company. We would probably end up with 8-10 teams after a few years, though.carey wrote:That is a fair & reasoned take. I just disagree but I disagree with many of the "rules" in the Collective Bargaining Agreement so not much of a surprise there. I've often wondered what the NBA would look like without one. Stars going wherever they want for as much as they want. Would the natural order of things balance out the super teams? Would the Lakers and Knicks buy championships every year? What if there were no draft? It's interesting to think about.Indy wrote: I think when you choose to work for a government sanctioned monopoly like the NBA, you lose a lot of liberties. I think HIPAA should be one of those, if your entire career is based on your body (I know it is not everything, but you get my drift). I think when you sign your paperwork to enter the draft, it should include statements that require you to be made available for interviews/physicals for every team (or a joint interview/common physical).
Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Totally agree. Probably will happen in the next CBA.Indy wrote:I think when you choose to work for a government sanctioned monopoly like the NBA, you lose a lot of liberties. I think HIPAA should be one of those, if your entire career is based on your body (I know it is not everything, but you get my drift). I think when you sign your paperwork to enter the draft, it should include statements that require you to be made available for interviews/physicals for every team (or a joint interview/common physical).carey wrote:Why? That violates HIPAA. I think players should be in control of who sees what. However, deciding not to show all your prospective employers your history does come off a bit funny. Like he is trying to game the system. I generally don't mind when players try to "take back the power" or control their own destiny, it just stinks when your team is the one they don't want to be on.EDC wrote:The part I don't like about the Dunn situation is the fact that he is only going to let certain teams give him a physical. He skipped the physical at the combine.
I don't think you can force a player to give a physical before the draft but I do believe that if he does one for a team all teams should have access to that information.
Not that I want Dunn anyway. I think he is an average NBA PG prospect.
Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
And little fan interest. I would have no interest in watching that type of league.Indy wrote:It is interesting. I would think they would need to "disband" the NBA, and make every team be their own company. We would probably end up with 8-10 teams after a few years, though.carey wrote:That is a fair & reasoned take. I just disagree but I disagree with many of the "rules" in the Collective Bargaining Agreement so not much of a surprise there. I've often wondered what the NBA would look like without one. Stars going wherever they want for as much as they want. Would the natural order of things balance out the super teams? Would the Lakers and Knicks buy championships every year? What if there were no draft? It's interesting to think about.Indy wrote: I think when you choose to work for a government sanctioned monopoly like the NBA, you lose a lot of liberties. I think HIPAA should be one of those, if your entire career is based on your body (I know it is not everything, but you get my drift). I think when you sign your paperwork to enter the draft, it should include statements that require you to be made available for interviews/physicals for every team (or a joint interview/common physical).
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Yup, and ruin decades and decades of history and common stats. No thanks!
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
Re: RE: Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
YES.Indy wrote:I think when you choose to work for a government sanctioned monopoly like the NBA, you lose a lot of liberties. I think HIPAA should be one of those, if your entire career is based on your body (I know it is not everything, but you get my drift). I think when you sign your paperwork to enter the draft, it should include statements that require you to be made available for interviews/physicals for every team (or a joint interview/common physical).
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
Aren't stats meaningless anyway? Baseball keeps clinging to their "history" and "stats" and all it has done is kill the game.Superbone wrote:Yup, and ruin decades and decades of history and common stats. No thanks!
- Aztec Sunsfan
- Posts: 1883
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 9:56 pm
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
It goes both ways, the players have guaranteed salaries and rookie scales, that certainly hurt the stars, but protects most of the middle class, much better than the other leagues.
- Charlie Smithy!
- Posts: 1746
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:01 pm
Re: DRAFT LOTTO 2016
<threadhijack>Okay, Indy, you gotta explain your perspective on this one to me - as I'm a baseball lifer who has always been knee-deep in the history and stats.Indy wrote:Aren't stats meaningless anyway? Baseball keeps clinging to their "history" and "stats" and all it has done is kill the game.Superbone wrote:Yup, and ruin decades and decades of history and common stats. No thanks!
