right. and Barkley can tell him this is the best winter city in the country. and when you're the King you can have any future you want in any city without having been on its team.TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Pretty sure he alreaydy owns a house in LA. Lets be honest here though, none of that stuff is really doable during the NBA season, and he can spend his off-season there anyway, I don't think its a selling point anymore.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:I don't know if Lebron even cares about joining an instant contender. There's a lot of reasons it might be nice for him to go to LA. Great entertainment, nightlife, things to do. Great weather. Lots of opportunities for business, acting, music, entertainment, all his various entrepreneurial desires. They'll have lots of fun. Probably won't win a title right away, but they're on the way up and will get better every year. Better owner, GM, staff, overall org. There's lots of reasons it might be nice to be in LA.
what the King needs, is another challenge to top off his career. putting a banner in a city without one, instead of adding to their collection (yeah, that's the angle)
now, having said that. i do find it an offensive trend for stars to pick a city to set up a dynasty in. it makes the game all about them instead of the fans/communities. parity and balance is supposed to be built in so fans in any city can have a shot. that's the fun of the sport. otherwise, just let the stars pick the city to use for their superteam and hand out their rings without sweating out a whole season