I'm not trying to be a dick about any of these things. I've seen a number of posts that call someone saying they will be better than 35 posts as being ridiculous and/or they mention that they are being realistic by predicting 30 wins.O_Gardino wrote: ↑Tue Sep 17, 2019 10:11 amAt the end of the season, if we win about 30 games, are you going to say that "the season was a complete disaster because a lot of things went very wrong," and call yourself an optimist?In2ition wrote: ↑Mon Sep 16, 2019 2:40 pmI'm curious why being pessimistic about the prospects of a team is being realistic? When did pessimism become synonymous with realism?
Maybe it always has been. It's weird that we can call the prognosticators realists if they say the '04-'05 Suns winning only 35 games tops and are outlandish dreamers smoking something if they come with an optimistic view of 50 wins.
I hate to be a dick about it, but I hate it even more when people start throwing around the optimist and pessimist labels to dismiss each other's point of view.
I still don't think that winning only 30 games is going to be good for this particular team. They should win much more than that, unless something catastrophic happens to them. That's why I would say that it would be a complete disaster and a lot of things went very wrong. I'm an optimist in that I think things will be much better than what the national or even consensus says they will. BTW, I like how you changed my name in the quote. That was cute.
