LA Rams
Re: LA Rams
I think the logo is fine. Certainly some worse ones out there.3rdside wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 4:56 amThis is hilarious - and that logo is stupid. If you ever doubt you could be put into a position of decision making authority ..
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/ ... -dickerson
- Flagrant Fowl
- Posts: 14533
- Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:04 am
- Location: Haeundae, Busan, South Korea
Re: LA Rams
Ah yes, simpler times when team logos were enough to get someone upset.
Reminds me of 6th months ago when MLS fans were losing their shit over the new Chicago Fire logo, which I think is a totally fine logo.
Reminds me of 6th months ago when MLS fans were losing their shit over the new Chicago Fire logo, which I think is a totally fine logo.
Send me a PM if you're interested in joining the phx-suns.net fantasy basketball league.
Re: LA Rams
You can't have a big 'C' in the middle of it. Come on! Is it the Chargers or the Rams logo?Indy wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 11:43 amI think the logo is fine. Certainly some worse ones out there.3rdside wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 4:56 amThis is hilarious - and that logo is stupid. If you ever doubt you could be put into a position of decision making authority ..
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/ ... -dickerson
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Re: LA Rams
Boring af for me, and that it looks like the Chargers logo, their next door neighbours, seems really stupid.Superbone wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 11:59 pmYou can't have a big 'C' in the middle of it. Come on! Is it the Chargers or the Rams logo?Indy wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 11:43 amI think the logo is fine. Certainly some worse ones out there.3rdside wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 4:56 amThis is hilarious - and that logo is stupid. If you ever doubt you could be put into a position of decision making authority ..
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/ ... -dickerson
Chicago Fire logo - can't see the fuss there?
And while on football, David Beckham's Inter Miami may be the biggest team naming f up of all time - it pays to do your research!:
https://www.turnpikelaw.com/inter-miami ... he-future/
Re: LA Rams
So ... the old Chicago Fire logo wasn't that bad so if you're a Chicago fan and you're comparing the two then I could see an issue, and apparently there are local gangs called the Kings - where the fire in the logo also represents a crown - but that might be reaching a bit.
But I'm not a Chicago fan and first impressions of the new logo were good.
No doubt there's better ones out there - the inter miami logo for example which is awesome - but it's nothing like the Rams' underwhelming effort.
But I'm not a Chicago fan and first impressions of the new logo were good.
No doubt there's better ones out there - the inter miami logo for example which is awesome - but it's nothing like the Rams' underwhelming effort.
Re: LA Rams
I didn't see the "penis" in the Rams logo that Dickerson (ironicaly) was talking about until it was pointed out. Now of course, I can't unsee it. The "LA" logo does look like the old Chargers logo too. Overall, pretty blah.
But I'm sure the marketing people/agency that worked on this convinced themselves and everyone else in the room that it was the greatest thing ever and all their research showed that the test groups loved the logo
But I'm sure the marketing people/agency that worked on this convinced themselves and everyone else in the room that it was the greatest thing ever and all their research showed that the test groups loved the logo

Re: LA Rams
On second thoughts - penises excluded - I think you're right ... but without the image of the Ram is when it looks boring. Could choose any font in the world and you go with that one.Indy wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 11:43 amI think the logo is fine. Certainly some worse ones out there.3rdside wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 4:56 amThis is hilarious - and that logo is stupid. If you ever doubt you could be put into a position of decision making authority ..
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/ ... -dickerson
- specialsauce
- Posts: 8674
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: LA Rams
I like the logo too. Think it’s fineIndy wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 11:43 amI think the logo is fine. Certainly some worse ones out there.3rdside wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 4:56 amThis is hilarious - and that logo is stupid. If you ever doubt you could be put into a position of decision making authority ..
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/ ... -dickerson
The Chargers reference I understand
Re: LA Rams
agree that with the ram is better, but on a helmet I think the less you have the better. Oh, and yes the font they chose is boring.3rdside wrote: ↑Fri Apr 03, 2020 4:43 amOn second thoughts - penises excluded - I think you're right ... but without the image of the Ram is when it looks boring. Could choose any font in the world and you go with that one.Indy wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 11:43 amI think the logo is fine. Certainly some worse ones out there.3rdside wrote: ↑Thu Apr 02, 2020 4:56 amThis is hilarious - and that logo is stupid. If you ever doubt you could be put into a position of decision making authority ..
https://www.theguardian.com/sport/2020/ ... -dickerson
Re: LA Rams
It looks like a Ram on the helmet. They are the Rams. Meh..
In four years, you don’t have to vote again. We’ll have it fixed so good, you’re not gonna have to vote.