Right guy, right role, right system, right players around him, and role players win rings.
Also, the numbers say that as "mediocre" as Frye was, the team was much, much better with him on the court. More so even than Grant Hill or Stoudemire.
Right guy, right role, right system, right players around him, and role players win rings.
Also, the numbers say that as "mediocre" as Frye was, the team was much, much better with him on the court. More so even than Grant Hill or Stoudemire.
Similar with Kurt Thomas.
See: Bowen, Bruce.
Dude, what happened to the real Wormwood? This is WAY too positive! I feel like I'm in an alternate universe.
Look, I could be wrong. I think there's a real chance we end up kicking ourselves for not taking Halliburton. But, his game has enough holes that maybe not.
Smith just seems low risk, given he has 2 elite skills, and one very good one, that translate well from college to the pros. Oh, and that one "very good" one is the key to the modern game. He's not going to be an all star. But his floor feels like, "Above average back-up PF /C".
I feel like Halliburton's holes mean he has more of a chance of bombing than Smith.
Maybe a better way to say it is Haliburton is a higher bust risk than Smith and JJ wants to avoid that.
Or JJ just has an idea of what he wants the team to look like and Smith was always his guy.
Either way, based on the CJ / Jalen Smith draft pattern - and now having watched some tape of Smith myself - I'm not arguing this pick (yet, anyway) however much I wanted Haliburton before the draft.
Maybe a better way to say it is Haliburton is a higher bust risk than Smith and JJ wants to avoid that.
I don't see that as true either.
It seems like Jones let positional need influence his decisions. If 2 prospects are in the same tier, that's generally the right play. I don't think Hali and Smith are.
Maybe a better way to say it is Haliburton is a higher bust risk than Smith and JJ wants to avoid that.
I don't see that as true either.
It seems like Jones let positional need influence his decisions. If 2 prospects are in the same tier, that's generally the right play. I don't think Hali and Smith are.
This is exactly how I see it, and I was one of the biggest supporters of drafting Smith; just didn't think I'd do it #10 and, of course, was not counting on Hali being available. So to me the pick is a C. With Hali gone it would have been a B or even an A.
Heard some talk that Haliburton told teams not to draft him. Wanted the Kings(which seems weird) but might explain his drop and maybe why we had no interest