That is a really good point. I think you want someone at the 4/5 that you can trust, even for spot minutes and practice (like Baynes last year).
Free Agency Thread
Re: Free Agency Thread
Online
- specialsauce
- Posts: 8738
- Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm
Re: Free Agency Thread
Jones has built a filthy good shooting roster on the cheap. Lots of redundant but NBA level talent. Other than Jones, I like the moves
Re: Free Agency Thread
I just like that he goes after guys with viable NBA skills and not like the other guy who thought drafted based on tools and how could they could be if they ever figured anything out. This team is potentially the most complete team we've had in 10 years.
Re: Free Agency Thread
Well, roster spots are filling up so if Taj is unwilling to join a team in the mentor role, he may be out of a job.ShelC wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 3:09 pmTaj would be a real nice pickup. It's tricky because you need someone who can produce but not be unhappy about a bench role. Are we committing minutes to Smith early on? Would we want Taj taking backup 4/5 minutes away from Smith? Taj also can't shoot 3s so there's the question of fit.
I don’t mind giving him some minutes even if he can’t shoot. You can survive with 4 shooters. Sometimes even 3.
I think he’d be great if he’s willing to accept the Udonis role plus spot minutes throughout the year.
Re: Free Agency Thread
But is it the year 2000 again? Is Shaq dominating the league? I feel like the school of thought that says you have a big man to go out and foul is very antiquated.
You're right that this isn't a move made for role that is going to see time. I just wish we were calculating and purposeful with our roster spots. I think you can get something out of all 13-15 roster spots, especially when you are building towards contention. I don't believe in throwing spots away when you haven't even had a winning season.
Re: Free Agency Thread
I'm not even sure Ayton would care. I wouldn't be happy. If Jones constantly dunks on Ayton in practice, I think I would just cry.Superbone wrote: ↑Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:59 pmI hope he embarrasses Ayton in practice by dunking on him repeatedly. Or at least attempting to.The Bobster wrote: ↑Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:48 pmJones has 193 FG in his career, 128 of them are dunks, which would explain his 67% career FG%
"Hey Ayton - watch what this guy does when he gets the ball near the basket."
Re: Free Agency Thread
Re: Free Agency Thread
Is Caboclo no longer two years from being two years away from making an impact?
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Re: Free Agency Thread
I'm fine with that contract. I would have loved to have Boucher. Has 3-point range, blocks shots, rebounds, athletic. Could have given us a lot that we don't currently have at the 4.Flagrant Fowl wrote: ↑Sun Nov 22, 2020 7:00 pm
I'd have preferred Boucher to Jones, but certainly not at that price.
Re: Free Agency Thread
That would be a problem and the beginning of the end.INFORMER wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 6:19 pmI'm not even sure Ayton would care. I wouldn't be happy. If Jones constantly dunks on Ayton in practice, I think I would just cry.Superbone wrote: ↑Sun Nov 22, 2020 2:59 pmI hope he embarrasses Ayton in practice by dunking on him repeatedly. Or at least attempting to.The Bobster wrote: ↑Sun Nov 22, 2020 12:48 pmJones has 193 FG in his career, 128 of them are dunks, which would explain his 67% career FG%
"Hey Ayton - watch what this guy does when he gets the ball near the basket."
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Re: Free Agency Thread
Yeah, we're locked in with this team for awhile. No wiggle room. We have the 2021 1st rounder, which will probably be in the 18-24 range, but with Jones drafting strategy of high floor/head-bashing low-ceiling, that may not move the needle.
Re: Free Agency Thread
I didn't want him back after the Bubble concluded because I didn't feel we could trust his 12 game performance to warrant making a long-term commitment.specialsauce wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 9:30 amConsidering what others were getting, I think it’s a reasonable deal.
But after the other moves made this offseason, I think you have to bring him back.
I don't love it, but it is what it is.
Re: Free Agency Thread
Jimmy Jones doesn't really value rebounding or athleticism.
I would have liked his defense, passing, rebounding, and emerging 3-point shot.
Re: Free Agency Thread
Because he hasn't. It was a miss. I was in favor of drafting him too. But he just didn't develop. Not saying he'll never find a place in the league, but there wasn't a point in keeping him around.
Re: Free Agency Thread
All this.
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Re: Free Agency Thread
Inf, we often see eye-to-eye, but liking the Portis and Gordon deals while hating on the Crowder move has me a bit puzzled.
Re: Free Agency Thread
Gordon?Shabazz wrote: ↑Mon Nov 23, 2020 6:52 pmInf, we often see eye-to-eye, but liking the Portis and Gordon deals while hating on the Crowder move has me a bit puzzled.
Portis signed a 2-year deal where he makes $4 million a year. That's pennies. Milwaukee knows what they're doing.