Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
-
- Posts: 3252
- Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 6:58 pm
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
Horry and Sam-I-Am (who had a curious likeness to the Lou Gossett alien character in "Enemy Mine") had been major parts of the two Hakeem-led NBA title teams. Then they get dealt to a Suns team that was in turmoil (although the Rockets were in a rapid state of decay, also). I understand their lack of enthusiasm, but they were fairly unprofessional about it. You're right about Mark Bryant, who was solid physically and on the court. The other trade piece was the much-travelled Chucky Brown, a historical footnote.
Well, so much for hopes and dreams ...
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
Didn't we end up having to package a first round pick with Bryant for cap room to sign [CENSORED]? That worked out pretty badly.
“Are you crazy?! You think I’m going to go for seven years and try to get there? You enjoy the 2030 draft picks that we have holding? I want to try to see the game today.” — Ish 3/13/25
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
I loved Mark Bryant. Very solid vet.SwingMan wrote:Mark Bryant was actually pretty solid, if not spectacular and we got El Ced back (with Rumeal Robinson), who worked out halfway decent with all the small-ball we were forced to play, for Horry - but yeah, the Barkley trade was, to be polite, rushed.Indy wrote:I think it was about a week, but agreed. It wasn't soon enough. I completely get trading Barkley (he didn't want to be here anyway, and wasn't into it). But you just don't do the trade they did without already having the 2nd step lined up.
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
Agreed. Only good thing we got out of the trade.INFORMER wrote:I loved Mark Bryant. Very solid vet.SwingMan wrote:Mark Bryant was actually pretty solid, if not spectacular and we got El Ced back (with Rumeal Robinson), who worked out halfway decent with all the small-ball we were forced to play, for Horry - but yeah, the Barkley trade was, to be polite, rushed.Indy wrote:I think it was about a week, but agreed. It wasn't soon enough. I completely get trading Barkley (he didn't want to be here anyway, and wasn't into it). But you just don't do the trade they did without already having the 2nd step lined up.
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
Are you kidding?Cap wrote:Didn't we end up having to package a first round pick with Bryant for cap room to sign [CENSORED]? That worked out pretty badly.
"We have had 7 foot centers. And we have had 300 pound centers. But we've never had a 7 foot, 300 pound center. Until now."
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
I agree with the sentiment that we're not an ideally constructed roster right now. We may have more talent than last year, but the '13-14 roster made more sense.
We're kind of begging for a consolidation trade for an established big. I wonder what a Plumlee, Green, Ennis package could bring in.
We're kind of begging for a consolidation trade for an established big. I wonder what a Plumlee, Green, Ennis package could bring in.
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
Throw in Bledsoe and get back Millsap with another front court player (not a stretch) and a decent two guard in the old Bell mold (best on D and can hit 3s).Shabazz wrote:I agree with the sentiment that we're not an ideally constructed roster right now. We may have more talent than last year, but the '13-14 roster made more sense.
We're kind of begging for a consolidation trade for an established big. I wonder what a Plumlee, Green, Ennis package could bring in.
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
We could have had Andre the Giant for a lot less money.Indy wrote:Are you kidding?Cap wrote:Didn't we end up having to package a first round pick with Bryant for cap room to sign [CENSORED]? That worked out pretty badly.
"We have had 7 foot centers. And we have had 300 pound centers. But we've never had a 7 foot, 300 pound center. Until now."
True, he had passed away by then, but he still would have stunk less than --- -------.
“Are you crazy?! You think I’m going to go for seven years and try to get there? You enjoy the 2030 draft picks that we have holding? I want to try to see the game today.” — Ish 3/13/25
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
Hey, those weren't my words.Cap wrote:We could have had Andre the Giant for a lot less money.Indy wrote:Are you kidding?Cap wrote:Didn't we end up having to package a first round pick with Bryant for cap room to sign [CENSORED]? That worked out pretty badly.
"We have had 7 foot centers. And we have had 300 pound centers. But we've never had a 7 foot, 300 pound center. Until now."
True, he had passed away by then, but he still would have stunk less than --- -------.
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
I don't get it. [CENSORED] wasn't close to 300 pounds was he? Shaq on the other hand...
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
Not quite. But that's how Jerry sold him to us.
- Ring_Wanted
- Posts: 5297
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:47 am
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
I think Atlanta is not going to be interested in a PG the way Teague is playing. Budenholzer loves shooting but they also need a true center to finally play Horford at PF, and they could use a backup PG, but probably moreso a veteran one because for a youngster they already have Schroder.Indy wrote:Throw in Bledsoe and get back Millsap with another front court player (not a stretch) and a decent two guard in the old Bell mold (best on D and can hit 3s).Shabazz wrote:I agree with the sentiment that we're not an ideally constructed roster right now. We may have more talent than last year, but the '13-14 roster made more sense.
We're kind of begging for a consolidation trade for an established big. I wonder what a Plumlee, Green, Ennis package could bring in.
What about Mozgov? We have discussed him before and Denver is again playing poorly, only that this time they have a rookie center who needs minutes while they could benefit from a pass first PG off the bench. Ideally they'd move McGee instead, but good luck with that.
Mozgov for Ennis, Tolliver and Minni's two 2ndR? Maybe too little when big men are so in demand, but adding a 1stR probably becomes too steep for the Suns.
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
i dont even see it that way anymore. everytime he shoots the ball, it's "yes, yes, YES!!!".He is damn good (at times) at shooting us to wins, many times with "No! No! No! YES!" shots. (Start rant within a rant--As much as he drives me crazy at times, I think he is really good for our team.)
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
truth be told, i prefer the dragic-green backcourt.ShelC wrote:I think we'll either get better as guys adjust to and understand their roles (especially in the backcourt) or guys won't adjust or understand their role and there will be some bickering behind the scenes (IT3 and Bledsoe come to mind).
if the suns did not sign bledsoe, the starting backcourt would be dragic-green, with isaiah as a microwave type gunner off the bench.
- SwingMan
- Posts: 1151
- Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 3:08 pm
- Location: Hell's Outhouse - a.k.a. Buckeye, Az.
- Contact:
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
[youtube][/youtube]
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
I was roundly laughed at for suggesting we sign Mozgov as a FA a summer ago. But no, no Ennis for Mozgov trades, please.Ring_Wanted wrote:I think Atlanta is not going to be interested in a PG the way Teague is playing. Budenholzer loves shooting but they also need a true center to finally play Horford at PF, and they could use a backup PG, but probably moreso a veteran one because for a youngster they already have Schroder.Indy wrote:Throw in Bledsoe and get back Millsap with another front court player (not a stretch) and a decent two guard in the old Bell mold (best on D and can hit 3s).Shabazz wrote:I agree with the sentiment that we're not an ideally constructed roster right now. We may have more talent than last year, but the '13-14 roster made more sense.
We're kind of begging for a consolidation trade for an established big. I wonder what a Plumlee, Green, Ennis package could bring in.
What about Mozgov? We have discussed him before and Denver is again playing poorly, only that this time they have a rookie center who needs minutes while they could benefit from a pass first PG off the bench. Ideally they'd move McGee instead, but good luck with that.
Mozgov for Ennis, Tolliver and Minni's two 2ndR? Maybe too little when big men are so in demand, but adding a 1stR probably becomes too steep for the Suns.
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
He's missed 50 shots already this year. He's shooting 40% from the floor and 33% from three. There are a ton of bad shots that he takes.SDC wrote:i dont even see it that way anymore. everytime he shoots the ball, it's "yes, yes, YES!!!".He is damn good (at times) at shooting us to wins, many times with "No! No! No! YES!" shots. (Start rant within a rant--As much as he drives me crazy at times, I think he is really good for our team.)
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
Yeah Mozgov is a nice C, i really like him and all but i don't know if he's that defensive presence we need under the basket. We should trade for a guy like Taj Gibson or some other good defensive PF like Horford or Millsap. The guy who i like is Stokes but i don't know if our FO is looking to take another guy to develop.Ring_Wanted wrote:I think Atlanta is not going to be interested in a PG the way Teague is playing. Budenholzer loves shooting but they also need a true center to finally play Horford at PF, and they could use a backup PG, but probably moreso a veteran one because for a youngster they already have Schroder.Indy wrote:Throw in Bledsoe and get back Millsap with another front court player (not a stretch) and a decent two guard in the old Bell mold (best on D and can hit 3s).Shabazz wrote:I agree with the sentiment that we're not an ideally constructed roster right now. We may have more talent than last year, but the '13-14 roster made more sense.
We're kind of begging for a consolidation trade for an established big. I wonder what a Plumlee, Green, Ennis package could bring in.
What about Mozgov? We have discussed him before and Denver is again playing poorly, only that this time they have a rookie center who needs minutes while they could benefit from a pass first PG off the bench. Ideally they'd move McGee instead, but good luck with that.
Mozgov for Ennis, Tolliver and Minni's two 2ndR? Maybe too little when big men are so in demand, but adding a 1stR probably becomes too steep for the Suns.
"The falling leaf does hate the wind"
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
his numbers were better last year when given significant minutes. not panicking right at all, especially after the last game.Indy wrote:He's missed 50 shots already this year. He's shooting 40% from the floor and 33% from three. There are a ton of bad shots that he takes.SDC wrote:i dont even see it that way anymore. everytime he shoots the ball, it's "yes, yes, YES!!!".He is damn good (at times) at shooting us to wins, many times with "No! No! No! YES!" shots. (Start rant within a rant--As much as he drives me crazy at times, I think he is really good for our team.)
everybody's shooting percentages are down, except for thomas maybe.
Re: Game Day: Warriors (5-0) @ Suns (3-3), Sun 11/09/14
maybe the suns should have tried to acquire pau gasol?Atreides wrote:Yeah Mozgov is a nice C, i really like him and all but i don't know if he's that defensive presence we need under the basket. We should trade for a guy like Taj Gibson or some other good defensive PF like Horford or Millsap. The guy who i like is Stokes but i don't know if our FO is looking to take another guy to develop.Ring_Wanted wrote:I think Atlanta is not going to be interested in a PG the way Teague is playing. Budenholzer loves shooting but they also need a true center to finally play Horford at PF, and they could use a backup PG, but probably moreso a veteran one because for a youngster they already have Schroder.Indy wrote:Throw in Bledsoe and get back Millsap with another front court player (not a stretch) and a decent two guard in the old Bell mold (best on D and can hit 3s).Shabazz wrote:I agree with the sentiment that we're not an ideally constructed roster right now. We may have more talent than last year, but the '13-14 roster made more sense.
We're kind of begging for a consolidation trade for an established big. I wonder what a Plumlee, Green, Ennis package could bring in.
What about Mozgov? We have discussed him before and Denver is again playing poorly, only that this time they have a rookie center who needs minutes while they could benefit from a pass first PG off the bench. Ideally they'd move McGee instead, but good luck with that.
Mozgov for Ennis, Tolliver and Minni's two 2ndR? Maybe too little when big men are so in demand, but adding a 1stR probably becomes too steep for the Suns.