NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Discussion of the league and of our favorite team.
Post Reply
User avatar
Split T
Posts: 29052
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Provo, Utah

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by Split T »

TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Ulis in the lottery? At 5'9" on a good day, no way IMO.
I think it depends on the situation. For instance, I think he makes some sense for utah. Burke sucks, Exum is an unknown and can easily slide to the 2. Utah has a great defense and can cover for ulis lack of size. What Utah needs is a pg that can run an offense and ulis is probably the best pure pg in the draft. I'd love him here as a backup, but I'd hesitate to take him at 13. I think there are some better prospects that will be available.

User avatar
carey
Posts: 12132
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by carey »

Danimal wrote:Some mock draft stuff from brightsideofthesun

Those guys sure do love Luwawu

http://www.brightsideofthesun.com/2016/ ... re-lottery
I'm willing to bet none of those guys have seen anything other than highlight videos.
Go Suns!

Og Snus!

User avatar
Danimal
Posts: 1754
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 6:04 am

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by Danimal »

I think there was one guy on there who had watched a bunch of European ball. But other than that its likely youtube analysis

User avatar
INFORMER
Posts: 8608
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:19 pm

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by INFORMER »

Flagrant Fowl wrote:Anyone interested in trying to trade for Blake Griffin? Seems like the Clippers would like to move him and a change of scenery might work in his favor at this point.

Suns trade: Brandon Knight, Archie Goodwin
Clippers trade: Blake Griffin

Some exchange of picks (not the Suns own first rounder) could be added. Maybe the Suns #13 & #28 for the Clips #25.
That definitely wouldn't be enough.

User avatar
Cap
Posts: 10181
Joined: Sun Mar 23, 2014 6:08 pm

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by Cap »

My rule: Don't trade for assholes unless it's going to make you a contender. Blake won't, and I don't want him.
“Are you crazy?! You think I’m going to go for seven years and try to get there? You enjoy the 2030 draft picks that we have holding? I want to try to see the game today.” — Ish 3/13/25

User avatar
INFORMER
Posts: 8608
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:19 pm

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by INFORMER »

OE32 wrote:If we take a big with our own pick, I'd be interested in Luwawu at 13, though I suspect the Jazz may take him. They could also opt for Beasley, Valentine or Korkmaz, given their offensive deficiencies. But if Luwawu's off the board, is Valentine the next guy on our list?

If we for some reason don't go back with our pick, I suspect each of Ellenson, Sabonis and Chriss will be gone by 13. That leaves Davis, Johnson and Labissiere. I prefer Johnson, myself.

Am I missing someone?
Luwawu is a very nice prospect.

User avatar
INFORMER
Posts: 8608
Joined: Thu Feb 27, 2014 2:19 pm

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by INFORMER »

OE32 wrote:
Split T wrote:Maybe Rabb? I'm not a big fan of the bigs outside of Chriss and Sabonis.
He's returning to Cal.
Thank goodness.

User avatar
Danimal
Posts: 1754
Joined: Sat Mar 01, 2014 6:04 am

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by Danimal »

Just noticed something crazy. Boston has 5 2nd round picks this year. They could draft and stash an entire lineup.

What to do in that situation. Obviously they will likely try and package a bunch. But say you kept them all l, how about doing something crazy like draft and stashing 5 centers in the hope a few pan out and appreciate in future value

User avatar
carey
Posts: 12132
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by carey »

Had not seen Rabb was going back to Cal. I liked him at #13.
Go Suns!

Og Snus!

Online
User avatar
JustWinBaby
Posts: 520
Joined: Sat Apr 23, 2016 2:33 pm
Location: Buckeye, Az

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by JustWinBaby »

I have not seen much on Denzel Valentine. I really do not know all that much about him but he did play 4 years in a very good program for Tom Izzo and Tom loved him. While we need just about everything I really think legit ball movement is by far the biggest issue. Booker appears to be a more than willing passer and Valentine averaged close to a triple double in his last year (19.2 pts, 7.5 assists. 7.8 rbds with a 30.0 PER). I have really not seen him play but his stats have me interested.

I would draft a power forward with the biggest upside at #4 and take Valentine at 13.
What was the reason to get rid of Monty again? Oh yeah, that guy we drafted rather than Doncic.

User avatar
OE32
Posts: 1605
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:43 am

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by OE32 »

JustWinBaby wrote:I have not seen much on Denzel Valentine. I really do not know all that much about him but he did play 4 years in a very good program for Tom Izzo and Tom loved him. While we need just about everything I really think legit ball movement is by far the biggest issue. Booker appears to be a more than willing passer and Valentine averaged close to a triple double in his last year (19.2 pts, 7.5 assists. 7.8 rbds with a 30.0 PER). I have really not seen him play but his stats have me interested.

I would draft a power forward with the biggest upside at #4 and take Valentine at 13.
My worry with Valentine is D - running a rotation of Warren, Booker and Valentine at the wings will leave us pretty defenseless. That's why I have Luwawu ahead of Valentine.

As far as our top pick is concerned, if we don't get Simmons/Ingram, the 4 with the biggest upside is clearly Bender, but we don't know if he's more unicorn or donkey at this point. After that, I'm not sure any of Chriss/Sabonis/Ellenson have tremendous "upside" - Sabonis I think will be a workhorse in the league that gets more wins than personal glory. Chriss looks like fool's gold to me. Ellenson could be very good offensively, but he doesn't appear to have a place as a defender - hunched over on defense, no lateral quickness whatsoever, no leaping ability. This is not an exciting draft for bigs.

User avatar
Superbone
Posts: 38154
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:44 am
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Mood:

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by Superbone »

OE32 wrote:This is not an exciting draft for bigs.
Just our luck. :(
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.

"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway

User avatar
OE32
Posts: 1605
Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:43 am

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by OE32 »

Superbone wrote:
OE32 wrote:This is not an exciting draft for bigs.
Just our luck. :(
Hence my desire to either trade up for Simmons or using our end-of-the-lotto pick to get a big, leaving the top pick dangling for whatever team is willing to make the best offer. I could see Murray, Hield or Dunn motivating plenty of teams to make a solid offer.

User avatar
carey
Posts: 12132
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by carey »

Just curious, but how many of you would do Knight + #3 (or 4 or 5) + Len for Boogie Cousins? I think it's an overpay but I'm pausing to think about it so that means it is probably fairly close to a decent price.
Go Suns!

Og Snus!

User avatar
TOO
Posts: 12750
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 2:21 pm

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by TOO »

Meh, dont want the attitude. Plus he thinks he's a 3pt shooter now.
Love, Hurts.

User avatar
Split T
Posts: 29052
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Provo, Utah

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by Split T »

I'd probably do it. It could blow up in our face, but I'd take that chance. Cousins has the most talent we've seen in a 5 since Shaq. He's big, strong, quick, skilled in the paint, can hit a jumper, passes well, and can even put the ball on the floor pretty well. When he wants to, he can be a good rim protector and defensive player and rebounder. He does turn the ball over way too much and spends too much time on the perimeter.

User avatar
Split T
Posts: 29052
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Provo, Utah

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by Split T »

OE32 wrote:
JustWinBaby wrote:I have not seen much on Denzel Valentine. I really do not know all that much about him but he did play 4 years in a very good program for Tom Izzo and Tom loved him. While we need just about everything I really think legit ball movement is by far the biggest issue. Booker appears to be a more than willing passer and Valentine averaged close to a triple double in his last year (19.2 pts, 7.5 assists. 7.8 rbds with a 30.0 PER). I have really not seen him play but his stats have me interested.

I would draft a power forward with the biggest upside at #4 and take Valentine at 13.
My worry with Valentine is D - running a rotation of Warren, Booker and Valentine at the wings will leave us pretty defenseless. That's why I have Luwawu ahead of Valentine.

As far as our top pick is concerned, if we don't get Simmons/Ingram, the 4 with the biggest upside is clearly Bender, but we don't know if he's more unicorn or donkey at this point. After that, I'm not sure any of Chriss/Sabonis/Ellenson have tremendous "upside" - Sabonis I think will be a workhorse in the league that gets more wins than personal glory. Chriss looks like fool's gold to me. Ellenson could be very good offensively, but he doesn't appear to have a place as a defender - hunched over on defense, no lateral quickness whatsoever, no leaping ability. This is not an exciting draft for bigs.
Have started looking in to luwawe and I'm liking what I see. I still have Valentine over him, but I'd be happy with luwawe. We do need a 3 and D guy to take Tucker's spot in the rotation. Luwawe looks like a guy who could guard 1-3 very well and be a threat offensively. Not a featured scorer, but not someone you can ignore.

I like Valentine because I think he'll be a great (above 40%) shooter from 3 and he's skilled enough to run the offense. I like bledsoe and think he does a lot for this team, but he struggles at being the facilitator for everyone. I think Valentine would take some pressure off as he's much more of a pg than knight.

I do worry about Valentine defensively, especially teamed with Booker and Warren as none of them forecast to be anything but average defensively. Honestly, I'm not sold on Warren in general and wouldn't be upset if we moved him for someone more defensively inclined.

User avatar
JCSunsfan
Posts: 2136
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 11:22 am

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by JCSunsfan »

INFORMER wrote:
Flagrant Fowl wrote:Anyone interested in trying to trade for Blake Griffin? Seems like the Clippers would like to move him and a change of scenery might work in his favor at this point.

Suns trade: Brandon Knight, Archie Goodwin
Clippers trade: Blake Griffin

Some exchange of picks (not the Suns own first rounder) could be added. Maybe the Suns #13 & #28 for the Clips #25.
That definitely wouldn't be enough.
Don't want Blake. He is a free agent in a year. I would not want him for this deal even.

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by Indy »

Cap wrote:My rule: Don't trade for assholes unless it's going to make you a contender. Blake won't, and I don't want him.
I fully support this rule.

User avatar
Mori Chu
Posts: 24905
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:05 am
Mood:

Re: RE: Re: NBA Draft Prospects Discussion

Post by Mori Chu »

carey wrote:Just curious, but how many of you would do Knight + #3 (or 4 or 5) + Len for Boogie Cousins? I think it's an overpay but I'm pausing to think about it so that means it is probably fairly close to a decent price.
I would absolutely do it. Boogie is probably a top 5 player in the league on a functional team. Those assets you listed are absolutely worth giving up for a player like that.

Sent from my Nexus 5X using Tapatalk

Post Reply