Superbone wrote:https://twitter.com/paulcoro/status/742815937242357760
This is why I don't like the "draft and stash" strategy with late first round picks. It works much better with second rounders.
Superbone wrote:https://twitter.com/paulcoro/status/742815937242357760
Probably because they are still under the illusion of winning now.virtual9mm wrote:I don't know why the Suns would not simply bring four rookies to camp. I'd ditch some of the veteran role players to make room, keeping them only to the extent that they'd provide veteran leadership.
Exactly. Sarver wants so badly to make the playoffs so he doesn't seem like such a failure. He will sacrifice doing it the right way just so he can say to colleagues, "Hey, we made the playoffs!" It's like having a Range Rover parked outside your apartment.Ring_Wanted wrote:Probably because they are still under the illusion of winning now.virtual9mm wrote:I don't know why the Suns would not simply bring four rookies to camp. I'd ditch some of the veteran role players to make room, keeping them only to the extent that they'd provide veteran leadership.
If they pass on Bender because he's not a "win now" choice...Ring_Wanted wrote:Probably because they are still under the illusion of winning now.virtual9mm wrote:I don't know why the Suns would not simply bring four rookies to camp. I'd ditch some of the veteran role players to make room, keeping them only to the extent that they'd provide veteran leadership.
Bender is not. Porzingod. Or the Freak. If you trust Murray or Hield maybe you are better off passing on Bender.Cap wrote:If they pass on Bender because he's not a "win now" choice...Ring_Wanted wrote:Probably because they are still under the illusion of winning now.virtual9mm wrote:I don't know why the Suns would not simply bring four rookies to camp. I'd ditch some of the veteran role players to make room, keeping them only to the extent that they'd provide veteran leadership.
About 32M. But you have to subtract rookie contracts and any cap holds. But it really doesn't matter. We shouldn't be spending much if we do it right.Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:How much cap space does that give us this offseason?
Aren't we at 62 for next year right now?Cap wrote:About $24M.
Probably not a good idea to spend it all in our current situation. Don't throw it at Kevin Love or Harrison Barnes just because we have it.
I haven't done the math yet, but it will be more than that even with our cap holds for the 1st round picks. Tucker is only partially guaranteed, and Jenkins and Alan Williams can be outright waived. All we have right now are the 3 big dogs (Eric, Brandon and Tyson), Tucker making $5M and Len, Booker, Warren and Archie still on their rookie deals. Basketball Insiders shows us with a guaranteed total of $52M but that doesn't include the rookie cap holds. With a $94M salary cap we should have much more than $24M.Cap wrote:About $24M.
Probably not a good idea to spend it all in our current situation. Don't throw it at Kevin Love or Harrison Barnes just because we have it.
Yep. Good catch. I thought I saw $70M, but that was for 2015-16 and I mistook it for 2016-17.Indy wrote:Aren't we at 62 for next year right now?Cap wrote:About $24M.
Probably not a good idea to spend it all in our current situation. Don't throw it at Kevin Love or Harrison Barnes just because we have it.