2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Discussion of the league and of our favorite team.
User avatar
carey
Posts: 12135
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by carey »

TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Example, look at Bradley Beal now, he was shooting low 40s his first few years too. People get better with maturity and work, I dont see a reason Booker wont.
Me either, but we can't just write it in as a done deal either. I choose to remain optimistic.
Go Suns!

Og Snus!

User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 13158
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by In2ition »

TheOriginalOriginal wrote:
carey wrote:
In2ition wrote:Well, I don't think we need to worry about Booker becoming Tyreke Evans, IMO. I definitely think he will keep improving, hopefully his ballhandling if I'm going to critique him at this stage.
Right. His ball handling is fairly advanced for a SG with his size in my opinion. He is a willing passer that is better than I expected. He's shooting percentages aren't as good as I think he's capable of, but I expect them to rise when he makes the leap and we surround him with more talent.
Example, look at Bradley Beal now, he was shooting low 40s his first few years too. People get better with maturity and work, I dont see a reason Booker wont.
I agree
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."

User avatar
Mori Chu
Posts: 25123
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:05 am
Mood:

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by Mori Chu »

There is no 2-guard in this draft who comes close to Booker IMO. Don't see why we would want to form a glut at that position.

User avatar
Split T
Posts: 29327
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Provo, Utah

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by Split T »

I think Monk could be a pretty special offensive player in this league. He's small though and i'm not sure if you could play him with Booker for long stretches.

User avatar
Superbone
Posts: 38519
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 11:44 am
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Mood:

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by Superbone »

Split T wrote:I think Monk could be a pretty special offensive player in this league. He's small though and i'm not sure if you could play him with Booker for long stretches.
Loved his TV show though.
Synchronicity and all that jazz, man.

"Cool is getting us blown out!"
-Shaheen Holloway

User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 13158
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by In2ition »

Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:There is no 2-guard in this draft who comes close to Booker IMO. Don't see why we would want to form a glut at that position.
Maybe not. Some people think Jackson could play some 2 guard. I think there are several that could play a good backup role. They say you can never have enough shooters.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."

Online
User avatar
O_Gardino
Posts: 6844
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 12:47 pm
Location: Shreveport, LA

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by O_Gardino »

Superbone wrote:
Split T wrote:I think Monk could be a pretty special offensive player in this league. He's small though and i'm not sure if you could play him with Booker for long stretches.
Loved his TV show though.
That show was a blessing. And a curse.
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan

User avatar
Split T
Posts: 29327
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Provo, Utah

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by Split T »

[youtube][/youtube]

If we miss out on the top 3(Fultz, Jackson, Ball IMO) I'm starting to think we should just take Ntilikina. He's a pg, but I think he'll be able to defend 1-3. I think you could even play a Ulis-Booker-Ntilikina lineup. He's great in the PNR and his shot has advanced quite well and I think he'd play well off the ball too. He's not explosive in the Bledsoe-Wall-Westbrook way, but he's a good enough athlete. Don't know a ton about him as it's hard to find footage and he's super young, but i'm intrigued.

User avatar
Flagrant Fowl
Posts: 14569
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:04 am
Location: Haeundae, Busan, South Korea

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by Flagrant Fowl »

Lonzo Ball is a great college player, but the ESPN circle jerk for him is getting on my nerves. I just saw a highlight on my phone where he makes a simple kickout pass and the headline was "Ball throws an absolute dime to Alford for three". Give me a break already. The play being a highlight in the first place is debateable.
Send me a PM if you're interested in joining the phx-suns.net fantasy basketball league.

User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 13158
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by In2ition »

Flagrant Fowl wrote:Lonzo Ball is a great college player, but the ESPN circle jerk for him is getting on my nerves. I just saw a highlight on my phone where he makes a simple kickout pass and the headline was "Ball throws an absolute dime to Alford for three". Give me a break already. The play being a highlight in the first place is debateable.
That seems silly. Simple plays shouldn't be highlighted and glorified.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by Indy »

In2ition wrote:
Flagrant Fowl wrote:Lonzo Ball is a great college player, but the ESPN circle jerk for him is getting on my nerves. I just saw a highlight on my phone where he makes a simple kickout pass and the headline was "Ball throws an absolute dime to Alford for three". Give me a break already. The play being a highlight in the first place is debateable.
That seems silly. Simple plays shouldn't be highlighted and glorified.
Maybe you just don't get it. It was an absolute dime.

User avatar
Flagrant Fowl
Posts: 14569
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:04 am
Location: Haeundae, Busan, South Korea

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by Flagrant Fowl »

Just to be clear, my gripe isn't with Ball himself. It's ESPN. But they've been doing this for years so I basically just did the sports equivalent of a sane person making a WTF comment after one of Trump's tweets.
Send me a PM if you're interested in joining the phx-suns.net fantasy basketball league.

User avatar
carey
Posts: 12135
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by carey »

So what do we all think of Ball's performance last night? He played 35 of 40 minutes and tallied just 8 points & 6 rebounds. Are we blaming it on the thumb?

Trier and Markkanen look like legitimate NBA players. I don't know that Trier will be able to shoot and defend like that at the next level but that's his ticket in. There will be a lot of teams after Markkanen. If we find ourselves out of the top 5 it might be wise to ransom him to a team for multiple picks or players.
Go Suns!

Og Snus!

User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 13158
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by In2ition »

Markkanen was great last night, honestly looked good enough that I would take him if the Suns fall in the lottery. UCLA didn't look right, and I'm sure Lonzo's thumb was effecting it. Oh well, they get some more rest going into the tournament.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."

User avatar
specialsauce
Posts: 8732
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by specialsauce »

carey wrote:So what do we all think of Ball's performance last night? He played 35 of 40 minutes and tallied just 8 points & 6 rebounds. Are we blaming it on the thumb?

Trier and Markkanen look like legitimate NBA players. I don't know that Trier will be able to shoot and defend like that at the next level but that's his ticket in. There will be a lot of teams after Markkanen. If we find ourselves out of the top 5 it might be wise to ransom him to a team for multiple picks or players.
I was not impressed with Ball at all. He didn't do anything before he got "injured" either. I don't like his dad either. PASS. Markkanen looked like the real deal last night

User avatar
Flagrant Fowl
Posts: 14569
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:04 am
Location: Haeundae, Busan, South Korea

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by Flagrant Fowl »

Surely Marky Mark must do better than the 1-5, 4 point and 3 rebound effort he put up against Oregon's front court last time if the Cats want to win the conference tournament.

Edit: http://www.espn.com/espn/now?nowId=1-18886773

Well, fuck. This one is now in the bag for the Cats.
Send me a PM if you're interested in joining the phx-suns.net fantasy basketball league.

User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 13158
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by In2ition »

specialsauce wrote:
carey wrote:So what do we all think of Ball's performance last night? He played 35 of 40 minutes and tallied just 8 points & 6 rebounds. Are we blaming it on the thumb?

Trier and Markkanen look like legitimate NBA players. I don't know that Trier will be able to shoot and defend like that at the next level but that's his ticket in. There will be a lot of teams after Markkanen. If we find ourselves out of the top 5 it might be wise to ransom him to a team for multiple picks or players.
I was not impressed with Ball at all. He didn't do anything before he got "injured" either. I don't like his dad either. PASS. Markkanen looked like the real deal last night
Don't let one game taint your opinion, he's been the best player in college basketball all year. And as far as the dad, I love his confidence in his kids and the bravado. They haven't and probably won't shrink under pressure. I don't think it hurt the Williams sisters or Tiger Woods.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."

User avatar
Mori Chu
Posts: 25123
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:05 am
Mood:

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by Mori Chu »

I don't know if I have a bias against U of A players because we see them more, but I'm not very sold on Markkanen. He seems to me like a guy whose skills won't translate well to the NBA. I know the sweet shooting big man is a hot commodity right now, but I watch him play and I see him getting shut down and not being able to produce in the same way with an NBA 3-point line and NBA defenses on him every night.

But I am famously always wrong about college hoops, so my opinions are not worth much.

User avatar
Split T
Posts: 29327
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Provo, Utah

Post by Split T »

I don't think he's Dirk, but hard to believe markkanen isn't at least Ryan Anderson in the NBA. I think the NBA will actually help him, he'll have better teammates that draw the defense away and he'll get a lot of great looks from 3.

He may look overmatched when the d locks in on him, but I don't think we'll see that much in the NBA. Not likely he'll ever be the number 1 option on offense in the NBA.

User avatar
specialsauce
Posts: 8732
Joined: Fri Mar 07, 2014 8:45 pm

Re: 2017 NBA Draft Prospect Discussion

Post by specialsauce »

In2ition wrote:
specialsauce wrote:
carey wrote:So what do we all think of Ball's performance last night? He played 35 of 40 minutes and tallied just 8 points & 6 rebounds. Are we blaming it on the thumb?

Trier and Markkanen look like legitimate NBA players. I don't know that Trier will be able to shoot and defend like that at the next level but that's his ticket in. There will be a lot of teams after Markkanen. If we find ourselves out of the top 5 it might be wise to ransom him to a team for multiple picks or players.
I was not impressed with Ball at all. He didn't do anything before he got "injured" either. I don't like his dad either. PASS. Markkanen looked like the real deal last night
Don't let one game taint your opinion, he's been the best player in college basketball all year. And as far as the dad, I love his confidence in his kids and the bravado. They haven't and probably won't shrink under pressure. I don't think it hurt the Williams sisters or Tiger Woods.
I think his dad is beyond bravado. And I think even if by some miracle we get him, he bolts to the Lakers at some point and I'd rather not deal with that. I don't like the way his shot looks. Maybe I'm extra annoyed because Bill Walton was slobbering all over him the whole game and ESPN was CONSTANTLY mentioning how "injured" he was

Post Reply