Game Day: Blazers (28-36) @ Suns (22-44), Sun 3/12/17

Discussion of the league and of our favorite team.
User avatar
carey
Posts: 12141
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: Game Day: Blazers (28-36) @ Suns (22-44), Sun 3/12/17

Post by carey »

ShelC wrote:At best he's a sparkplug backup off the bench. He won't be a full time starter.
I tend to agree. I guess it's not outside the realm of possibility that he is the next IT but his offense would have to grow by leaps & bounds. He's officially listed as taller than IT but I don't think that's true at all. Ulis is small.
Go Suns!

Og Snus!

User avatar
djy2j
Posts: 3499
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 7:10 am

Re: Game Day: Blazers (28-36) @ Suns (22-44), Sun 3/12/17

Post by djy2j »

carey wrote:
ShelC wrote:At best he's a sparkplug backup off the bench. He won't be a full time starter.
I tend to agree. I guess it's not outside the realm of possibility that he is the next IT but his offense would have to grow by leaps & bounds. He's officially listed as taller than IT but I don't think that's true at all. Ulis is small.
Ulis averaged 17ppg his sophomore season on college to IT's 15. Ulis shot 43% to Thomas's 41% with 3pt% being just as similar. Ulis already has decent range and a nice floater. I guess I just feel like Ulis is much closer than I thought to mirroring IT's development timeline. I understand the weight thing is a huge issue but in terms of offense Ulis is technically ahead of where IT was.
The artist formerly known as Y2JJEDIPIMP on .net

"Just like Neal Armstrong I went to space and now I'm back..."

User avatar
ShelC
Posts: 14189
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 6:00 am

Re: Game Day: Blazers (28-36) @ Suns (22-44), Sun 3/12/17

Post by ShelC »

I never go by measurements, more the eye test. To me, Ulis is 5-8 and slight (150). IT is 5-10 and solid (180). It may not seem like much, but there's a big difference. Ulis is a pass first PG which is probably why his offense has stagnated over the years. IT is a natural scorer.

User avatar
Split T
Posts: 29372
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Provo, Utah

Re: Game Day: Blazers (28-36) @ Suns (22-44), Sun 3/12/17

Post by Split T »

IT measured 5'8.75 at the combine without shoes with a 6'1.75 wingspan. He weighed 186 lbs.
Ulis was also 5'8.75 at the combine without shoes with a 6'2 wingspan. He was measured at 5'8 flat the year before without shoes. He weighed 149 lbs

Did Ulis actually grow 3/4 of an inch during his sophomore year of college, or is his measurement slightly off. Regardless, he's about the same height as IT, but 35 lbs lighter than IT was coming into the NBA.

I'm not going to say that Ulis size will keep him from being an NBA starter, it might, but I don't think it has to. I think his game is less predicated on size than IT's. Ulis is never going to be the scorer that IT is, he just needs to be able to keep the defense honest. Is he really going to struggle defensively anymore than guys like IT, Tony Parker, or Steve Nash? I don't think so. He's got better defensive instincts and ability than any of them ever had already.

User avatar
O_Gardino
Posts: 6862
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 12:47 pm
Location: Shreveport, LA

Re: Game Day: Blazers (28-36) @ Suns (22-44), Sun 3/12/17

Post by O_Gardino »

Forgot to mention, we get outrebounded pretty well the last two games. Seems like normal for the Suns, but this season we have been rebounding very well. We miss Chandler / Len on the boards. Williams can't do it all himself, and Chriss / Warren / Booker are bad rebounders.
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan

LazarusLong
Posts: 3252
Joined: Wed Mar 05, 2014 6:58 pm

Re: Game Day: Blazers (28-36) @ Suns (22-44), Sun 3/12/17

Post by LazarusLong »

"Williams can't do it all himself, and Chriss / Warren / Booker are bad rebounders."

FYI, TJ has been averaging 8.4 boards during March (7 games). Doesn't make him Dennis Rodman, but he has picked it up.
Well, so much for hopes and dreams ...

User avatar
ShelC
Posts: 14189
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 6:00 am

Re: Game Day: Blazers (28-36) @ Suns (22-44), Sun 3/12/17

Post by ShelC »

Size matters.

User avatar
JCSunsfan
Posts: 2136
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 11:22 am

Re: Game Day: Blazers (28-36) @ Suns (22-44), Sun 3/12/17

Post by JCSunsfan »

LazarusLong wrote:"Williams can't do it all himself, and Chriss / Warren / Booker are bad rebounders."

FYI, TJ has been averaging 8.4 boards during March (7 games). Doesn't make him Dennis Rodman, but he has picked it up.
Thats a good number for a SF.

User avatar
O_Gardino
Posts: 6862
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 12:47 pm
Location: Shreveport, LA

Re: Game Day: Blazers (28-36) @ Suns (22-44), Sun 3/12/17

Post by O_Gardino »

Good point, Laz.
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan

User avatar
Mori Chu
Posts: 25132
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:05 am
Mood:

Re: Game Day: Blazers (28-36) @ Suns (22-44), Sun 3/12/17

Post by Mori Chu »

ShelC wrote:At best he's a sparkplug backup off the bench. He won't be a full time starter.
I am not certain that his ceiling is to be a bench guard. But I'd be delighted to have him in kind of a "Socks" Perry role for a few years while he learns the pro game.

User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 13159
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: Game Day: Blazers (28-36) @ Suns (22-44), Sun 3/12/17

Post by In2ition »

Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:
ShelC wrote:At best he's a sparkplug backup off the bench. He won't be a full time starter.
I am not certain that his ceiling is to be a bench guard. But I'd be delighted to have him in kind of a "Socks" Perry role for a few years while he learns the pro game.
I don't see him as a starter, and agree with a career backup.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: Game Day: Blazers (28-36) @ Suns (22-44), Sun 3/12/17

Post by Indy »

In2ition wrote:
Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:
ShelC wrote:At best he's a sparkplug backup off the bench. He won't be a full time starter.
I am not certain that his ceiling is to be a bench guard. But I'd be delighted to have him in kind of a "Socks" Perry role for a few years while he learns the pro game.
I don't see him as a starter, and agree with a career backup.
I realize we are an awful team this year, but he keeps delivering for us. I can see him as a good starter in this league, but not elite. Basically where we are with Bledsoe, but completely different type.

Post Reply