NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Discussion of the league and of our favorite team.
User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 13159
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by In2ition »

Marty [Mori Chu] wrote:That game was a lot of fun to watch. But I can't shake the feeling that this is bad for the league. Warriors just have a bit too much concentration of talent. If they didn't have Durant, the matchup would be a lot more even and interesting.
It's a lot of talent for sure, and yet not a single #1 pick on their team. You got to have a devious and brilliant mind, able to play the long game, and have a bit of luck along the way to overcome a team like this. It's going to be a few years, as they really are all pretty young still. You've got to come up with an alternative way of playing against them, to shut down their outside attack, be able to switch everything, keep them out of the paint and make them pay inside and out. And, you're going to have to execute and play extremely well together for a number of years

As a thought experiment, keeping the Cavs and Warriors out of it, of the players that are left, how would you build a team that could beat the Warriors regularly?

Give me a team where each position can play both ways and has a tall pass first pg that can fill the box sheet, a shooting guard that can create his own shot and score in almost any way, a lockdown 2 way monster at the sf, a long rangy athletic pf that can go inside and out, and a defensive stud with 3pt range and ability to switch onto all 5 positions.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."

User avatar
ShelC
Posts: 14189
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 6:00 am

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by ShelC »

Off the top of my head, it'd be some combo of Wall, Westbrook, Harden, Damian Lillard, Devin Booker, Paul George, Kahwi, Giannis, Anthony Davis, KAT, Gobert.

Figure Westbrook, Harden, Kahwi, Giannis, AD/KAT.

User avatar
carey
Posts: 12141
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by carey »

I'd try & build a defensive juggernaut.

Conley as best pick & roll defender at PG.
Butler ball hawk defender at SG
Kawhi best all around defender at SF.
AD best 2-way PF outside Draymond.
Gobert b/c obvious.
Go Suns!

Og Snus!

User avatar
TOO
Posts: 13120
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 2:21 pm

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by TOO »

Indy wrote:
TheOriginalOriginal wrote:Went about as expected, I really hoped the Cavs would show a little better, but the Warriors are so loaded everywhere, its gross. Bleh..
Don't forget about last year.
Oh I havent, but unless the Cavs can find a way to stop the Warriors from having their way in the paint, this one is over in 4.
Love, Hurts.

User avatar
Split T
Posts: 29372
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Provo, Utah

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by Split T »

Wall-Middleton-Kawhi-Giannis-AD

Could easily take Paul over Wall and Butler over Middleton, but I wanted a shooter at the 2 and I just don't like Paul.

User avatar
Mori Chu
Posts: 25132
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:05 am
Mood:

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by Mori Chu »

These "beat GS" lineups all need more shooting. GS will 3-pointer you off the floor. 3-and-D is how you win in 2017-18's NBA.

User avatar
Mori Chu
Posts: 25132
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 10:05 am
Mood:

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by Mori Chu »

Interesting article from FiveThirtyEight about the dominance of the Warriors in Game 1.

https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/th ... ba-finals/

User avatar
Split T
Posts: 29372
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Provo, Utah

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by Split T »

Is this series over? I think they'd almost zero chance Cleveland can win 4 games against golden state. I'm not sure they even win one.

User avatar
carey
Posts: 12141
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:06 pm
Contact:

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by carey »

Split T wrote:Is this series over? I think they'd almost zero chance Cleveland can win 4 games against golden state. I'm not sure they even win one.
I think they win one if not both in Cleveland, then we'll see.
Go Suns!

Og Snus!

User avatar
Flagrant Fowl
Posts: 14610
Joined: Tue Apr 01, 2014 8:04 am
Location: Haeundae, Busan, South Korea

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by Flagrant Fowl »

I don't see how Cleveland wins 4 of the next 6 games without GSW suffering some sort of major injury or suspension.

I'm expecting to see some unbalanced officiating in game 3 and/or 4.
Send me a PM if you're interested in joining the phx-suns.net fantasy basketball league.

User avatar
Hermen
Posts: 894
Joined: Tue Jun 24, 2014 3:35 pm

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by Hermen »

It's not small ball if Durant is on the floor.

User avatar
O_Gardino
Posts: 6862
Joined: Fri May 20, 2016 12:47 pm
Location: Shreveport, LA

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by O_Gardino »

I think when this season is done, the narrative of the Durant going to GSW will shift a bit. It will be that Durant went to a 73 win team and was clearly the best player on that team. It's hard to see how winning and being clearly the best player on a great team will be worse for his legacy than struggling to win while sharing the Best Player role on an average team. People are starting to forget that they are mad at him for moving, and by the end of his career it won't hurt his legacy at all.
The league needs heroes, villains... and clowns. -- Aztec Sunsfan

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by Indy »

O_Gardino wrote:I think when this season is done, the narrative of the Durant going to GSW will shift a bit. It will be that Durant went to a 73 win team and was clearly the best player on that team. It's hard to see how winning and being clearly the best player on a great team will be worse for his legacy than struggling to win while sharing the Best Player role on an average team. People are starting to forget that they are mad at him for moving, and by the end of his career it won't hurt his legacy at all.
The way he is playing, you could make an argument he is the 2nd best player in the league.

User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 13159
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by In2ition »

Indy wrote:
O_Gardino wrote:I think when this season is done, the narrative of the Durant going to GSW will shift a bit. It will be that Durant went to a 73 win team and was clearly the best player on that team. It's hard to see how winning and being clearly the best player on a great team will be worse for his legacy than struggling to win while sharing the Best Player role on an average team. People are starting to forget that they are mad at him for moving, and by the end of his career it won't hurt his legacy at all.
The way he is playing, you could make an argument he is the 2nd best player in the league.
I don't think you would have to work very hard to make that argument.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by Indy »

In2ition wrote:
Indy wrote:
O_Gardino wrote:I think when this season is done, the narrative of the Durant going to GSW will shift a bit. It will be that Durant went to a 73 win team and was clearly the best player on that team. It's hard to see how winning and being clearly the best player on a great team will be worse for his legacy than struggling to win while sharing the Best Player role on an average team. People are starting to forget that they are mad at him for moving, and by the end of his career it won't hurt his legacy at all.
The way he is playing, you could make an argument he is the 2nd best player in the league.
I don't think you would have to work very hard to make that argument.
Probably not, but he wasn't regularly talked about in the MVP talk this year.

User avatar
ShelC
Posts: 14189
Joined: Fri Feb 28, 2014 6:00 am

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by ShelC »

The MVP thing is interesting because guys on those super teams are basically giving up that award. I'm sure there are incentives and marketing opportunities, plus general legacy stuff that comes with being an MVP, but you can't put Curry, Dray, Klay and Durant on a team and then have one as the MVP.

User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 13159
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by In2ition »

Indy wrote:
In2ition wrote:
Indy wrote:
O_Gardino wrote:I think when this season is done, the narrative of the Durant going to GSW will shift a bit. It will be that Durant went to a 73 win team and was clearly the best player on that team. It's hard to see how winning and being clearly the best player on a great team will be worse for his legacy than struggling to win while sharing the Best Player role on an average team. People are starting to forget that they are mad at him for moving, and by the end of his career it won't hurt his legacy at all.
The way he is playing, you could make an argument he is the 2nd best player in the league.
I don't think you would have to work very hard to make that argument.
Probably not, but he wasn't regularly talked about in the MVP talk this year.
It was understandable that he wasn't. You had a couple guys that were putting up historic numbers, elevating their teams. Another that was carrying a traditionally strong team on both ends of the floor, and the best player in the league didn't even make it into the top 3 of candidates for MVP. Durant went to a 73 win team, with the 2 time MVP and multiple other all-stars, and they won 6 fewer games this year.
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."

User avatar
Indy
Posts: 19339
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2014 9:21 pm
Contact:

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by Indy »

I get both of those things. But this year, people were not talking about Durant being one of the top 2-3 players in the league. All of the talk when he went over was that he was "one of the best FA in a long time" or that he is a future HOF player. It is just interesting how much his presence has taken over the team. I don't think people were thinking when the season started, that he was their best player.

User avatar
Split T
Posts: 29372
Joined: Wed Jul 16, 2014 9:51 am
Location: Provo, Utah

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by Split T »

Durant has an incredibly efficient year. Had he not got hurt, I think he would have been in the MVP discussion. Probably the 5th guy, so not a serious contender but he'd have gotten some votes.

As for his legacy, the same thing happened to LeBron. Everyone said joining up with Wade would hurt his legacy, now no one cares. 5 years from now, when Durant has 4 titles, everyone will just be impressed that he was the best player on a dynasty.

User avatar
In2ition
Posts: 13159
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2014 1:35 pm

Re: NBA Finals 2017: Warriors vs Cavs

Post by In2ition »

You're right. How soon we forget...
"There are 3 rules I live by: never get less than 12 hours sleep, never play cards with a guy with the same first name as a city & never get involved with a woman with a tattoo of a dagger on her body. Everything else is cream cheese."

Post Reply